↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : PUZ018-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 13:42:04 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 58.66s 59.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 58.88s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : PUZ018-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue Jun 18 10:33:09 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 58.60/59.35  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.60/59.35  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 58.60/59.35  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 58.60/59.35  % Transform   :cnf
% 58.60/59.35  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 58.60/59.35  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 58.60/59.35  
% 58.60/59.35  % Result      :Theorem 58.060000s
% 58.60/59.35  % Output      :CNFRefutation 58.060000s
% 58.60/59.35  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.66/59.36  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.66/59.36  % File     : PUZ018-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% 58.66/59.36  % Domain   : Puzzles
% 58.66/59.36  % Problem  : The Interns
% 58.66/59.36  % Version  : Especial.
% 58.66/59.36  % English  : Three interns are residents of the same hospital. On only one
% 58.66/59.36  %            day of the week are all three interns on call. No intern
% 58.66/59.36  %            is on call on three consecutiveutive days. No two interns are
% 58.66/59.36  %            off on the same day more than once a week. The first intern
% 58.66/59.36  %            is off on Sunday, Tuesday, and Thursday. The second intern
% 58.66/59.36  %            is off on Thursday and Saturday. The third intern is off
% 58.66/59.36  %            on Sunday.  Which day of the week are all three interns
% 58.66/59.36  %            on call?
% 58.66/59.36  
% 58.66/59.36  % Refs     : [Rap95] Raptis (1995), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 58.66/59.36  % Source   : [ANL]
% 58.66/59.37  % Names    : interns.ver1.in [ANL]
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 58.66/59.37  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.12 v6.1.0, 0.00 v3.1.0, 0.11 v2.7.0, 0.17 v2.6.0, 0.11 v2.5.0, 0.25 v2.4.0, 0.00 v2.1.0, 0.00 v2.0.0
% 58.66/59.37  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   48 (  40 unt;   2 nHn;  45 RR)
% 58.66/59.37  %            Number of literals    :   72 (   0 equ;  45 neg)
% 58.66/59.37  %            Maximal clause size   :    7 (   1 avg)
% 58.66/59.37  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 58.66/59.37  %            Number of predicates  :    5 (   5 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 58.66/59.37  %            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;  10 con; 0-0 aty)
% 58.66/59.37  %            Number of variables   :   17 (   1 sgn)
% 58.66/59.37  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_EPR_NEQ_NHN
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  % Comments : Dimitris Raptis pointed out [Rap95] that this was trivially
% 58.66/59.37  %            unsatisfiable, by resolving prove_all_on_one_day
% 58.66/59.37  %            [--all_on(Day)] with all_on_one_day.
% 58.66/59.37  % Bugfixes : v1.2.0 - Theorem clause prove_all_on_one_day grounded.
% 58.66/59.37  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(all_on_a_on,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ( ~ all_on(X)
% 58.66/59.37      | on(a,X) ) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(all_on_b_on,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ( ~ all_on(X)
% 58.66/59.37      | on(b,X) ) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(all_on_c_on,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ( ~ all_on(X)
% 58.66/59.37      | on(c,X) ) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(all_on,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ( all_on(X)
% 58.66/59.37      | ~ on(a,X)
% 58.66/59.37      | ~ on(b,X)
% 58.66/59.37      | ~ on(c,X) ) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(all_on_well_defined,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ( ~ all_on(X)
% 58.66/59.37      | ~ all_on(Y)
% 58.66/59.37      | same_day(X,Y) ) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(monday_follows_sunday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      consecutive(sunday,monday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(tuesday_follows_monday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      consecutive(monday,tuesday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(wednesday_follows_tuesday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      consecutive(tuesday,wednesday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(thursday_follows_wednesday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      consecutive(wednesday,thursday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(friday_follows_thursday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      consecutive(thursday,friday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(staurday_follows_friday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      consecutive(friday,saturday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(sunday_follows_saturday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      consecutive(saturday,sunday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(reflexivity_for_same_person,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      same_person(X,X) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(a_not_b,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ same_person(a,b) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(a_not_c,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ same_person(a,c) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(b_not_c,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ same_person(b,c) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(reflexivity_for_same_day,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      same_day(X,X) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(sunday_not_monday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ same_day(sunday,monday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(sunday_not_tuesday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ same_day(sunday,tuesday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(sunday_not_wednesday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ same_day(sunday,wednesday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(sunday_not_thursday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ same_day(sunday,thursday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(sunday_not_friday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ same_day(sunday,friday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(sunday_not_saturday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ same_day(sunday,saturday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(monday_not_tuesday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ same_day(monday,tuesday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(monday_not_wednesday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ same_day(monday,wednesday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(monday_not_thursday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ same_day(monday,thursday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(monday_not_friday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ same_day(monday,friday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(monday_not_saturday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ same_day(monday,saturday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(tuesday_not_wednesday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ same_day(tuesday,wednesday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(tuesday_not_thursday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ same_day(tuesday,thursday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(tuesday_not_friday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ same_day(tuesday,friday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(tuesday_not_saturday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ same_day(tuesday,saturday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(wednesday_not_thursday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ same_day(wednesday,thursday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(wednesday_not_friday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ same_day(wednesday,friday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(wednesday_not_saturday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ same_day(wednesday,saturday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(thursday_not_friday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ same_day(thursday,friday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(thursday_not_saturday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ same_day(thursday,saturday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(friday_not_saturday,axiom,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ same_day(friday,saturday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(all_on_one_day,hypothesis,
% 58.66/59.37      ( all_on(sunday)
% 58.66/59.37      | all_on(monday)
% 58.66/59.37      | all_on(tuesday)
% 58.66/59.37      | all_on(wednesday)
% 58.66/59.37      | all_on(thursday)
% 58.66/59.37      | all_on(friday)
% 58.66/59.37      | all_on(saturday) ) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(not_on_for_3_days,hypothesis,
% 58.66/59.37      ( ~ consecutive(X,Y)
% 58.66/59.37      | ~ consecutive(Y,Z)
% 58.66/59.37      | ~ consecutive(Z,W)
% 58.66/59.37      | ~ on(U,X)
% 58.66/59.37      | ~ on(U,Y)
% 58.66/59.37      | ~ on(U,Z) ) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(no_two_off_twice_together,hypothesis,
% 58.66/59.37      ( on(X,Y)
% 58.66/59.37      | on(X,Z)
% 58.66/59.37      | on(W,Y)
% 58.66/59.37      | on(W,Z)
% 58.66/59.37      | same_person(X,W)
% 58.66/59.37      | same_day(Y,Z) ) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(a_off_sunday,hypothesis,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ on(a,sunday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(a_off_tuesday,hypothesis,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ on(a,tuesday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(a_off_thursday,hypothesis,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ on(a,thursday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(b_off_thursday,hypothesis,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ on(b,thursday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(b_off_saturday,hypothesis,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ on(b,saturday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(c_off_sunday,hypothesis,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ on(c,sunday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  cnf(prove_all_on_friday,negated_conjecture,
% 58.66/59.37      ~ all_on(friday) ).
% 58.66/59.37  
% 58.66/59.37  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.66/59.37  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.66/59.37  % Proof found
% 58.66/59.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 58.66/59.37  % SZS output start Proof
% 58.66/59.38  %ClaNum:48(EqnAxiom:0)
% 58.66/59.38  %VarNum:42(SingletonVarNum:17)
% 58.66/59.38  %MaxLitNum:7
% 58.66/59.38  %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 58.66/59.38  %SharedTerms:55
% 58.66/59.38  %goalClause: 10
% 58.66/59.38  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 58.66/59.38  [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 58.66/59.38  [2]P1(a2,a8)
% 58.66/59.38  [3]P1(a8,a10)
% 58.66/59.38  [4]P1(a10,a9)
% 58.66/59.38  [5]P1(a9,a3)
% 58.66/59.38  [6]P1(a3,a7)
% 58.66/59.38  [7]P1(a7,a1)
% 58.66/59.38  [10]~P2(a3)
% 58.66/59.38  [11]~P4(a4,a1)
% 58.66/59.38  [12]~P4(a4,a8)
% 58.66/59.38  [13]~P4(a4,a9)
% 58.66/59.38  [14]~P4(a5,a9)
% 58.66/59.38  [15]~P4(a5,a7)
% 58.66/59.38  [16]~P4(a6,a1)
% 58.66/59.38  [17]~P3(a1,a2)
% 58.66/59.38  [18]~P3(a1,a8)
% 58.66/59.38  [19]~P3(a1,a10)
% 58.66/59.38  [20]~P3(a1,a9)
% 58.66/59.38  [21]~P3(a1,a3)
% 58.66/59.38  [22]~P3(a1,a7)
% 58.66/59.38  [23]~P3(a2,a8)
% 58.66/59.38  [24]~P3(a2,a10)
% 58.66/59.38  [25]~P3(a2,a9)
% 58.66/59.38  [26]~P3(a2,a3)
% 58.66/59.38  [27]~P3(a2,a7)
% 58.66/59.38  [28]~P3(a8,a10)
% 58.66/59.38  [29]~P3(a8,a9)
% 58.66/59.38  [30]~P3(a8,a3)
% 58.66/59.38  [31]~P3(a8,a7)
% 58.66/59.38  [32]~P3(a10,a9)
% 58.66/59.38  [33]~P3(a10,a3)
% 58.66/59.38  [34]~P3(a10,a7)
% 58.66/59.38  [35]~P3(a9,a3)
% 58.66/59.38  [36]~P3(a9,a7)
% 58.66/59.38  [37]~P3(a3,a7)
% 58.66/59.38  [38]~P5(a4,a5)
% 58.66/59.38  [39]~P5(a4,a6)
% 58.66/59.38  [40]~P5(a5,a6)
% 58.66/59.38  [8]P3(x81,x81)
% 58.66/59.38  [9]P5(x91,x91)
% 58.66/59.38  [41]~P2(x411)+P4(a4,x411)
% 58.66/59.38  [42]~P2(x421)+P4(a5,x421)
% 58.66/59.38  [43]~P2(x431)+P4(a6,x431)
% 58.66/59.38  [45]~P2(x452)+~P2(x451)+P3(x451,x452)
% 58.66/59.38  [46]P2(x461)+~P4(a4,x461)+~P4(a5,x461)+~P4(a6,x461)
% 58.66/59.38  [47]P4(x474,x473)+P3(x473,x472)+P5(x474,x471)+P4(x471,x472)+P4(x471,x473)+P4(x474,x472)
% 58.66/59.38  [48]~P1(x483,x482)+~P1(x484,x483)+~P4(x481,x482)+~P4(x481,x483)+~P4(x481,x484)+~P1(x482,x485)
% 58.66/59.38  [44]P2(a1)+P2(a2)+P2(a8)+P2(a10)+P2(a9)+P2(a3)+P2(a7)
% 58.66/59.38  %EqnAxiom
% 58.66/59.38  
% 58.66/59.38  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.77/59.46  cnf(49,plain,
% 58.77/59.46     (~P2(a1)),
% 58.77/59.46     inference(scs_inference,[],[11,41])).
% 58.77/59.46  cnf(51,plain,
% 58.77/59.46     (~P2(a9)),
% 58.77/59.46     inference(scs_inference,[],[11,14,41,42])).
% 58.77/59.46  cnf(58,plain,
% 58.77/59.46     (P2(a2)+P2(a8)+P2(a10)+P2(a7)),
% 58.77/59.46     inference(scs_inference,[],[49,51,10,44])).
% 58.77/59.46  cnf(59,plain,
% 58.77/59.46     (~P2(a7)),
% 58.77/59.46     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,42])).
% 58.77/59.46  cnf(61,plain,
% 58.77/59.46     (~P2(a8)),
% 58.77/59.46     inference(scs_inference,[],[12,15,42,41])).
% 58.77/59.46  cnf(70,plain,
% 58.77/59.46     (P2(a2)+P2(a10)),
% 58.77/59.46     inference(scs_inference,[],[61,59,58])).
% 58.77/59.46  cnf(429,plain,
% 58.77/59.46     (P4(a5,a2)+P2(a10)),
% 58.77/59.46     inference(scs_inference,[],[70,42])).
% 58.77/59.46  cnf(491,plain,
% 58.77/59.46     (P4(a6,a10)+P2(a2)),
% 58.77/59.46     inference(scs_inference,[],[70,43])).
% 58.77/59.46  cnf(893,plain,
% 58.77/59.46     (P4(a4,a2)+P4(a6,a10)),
% 58.77/59.46     inference(scs_inference,[],[41,491])).
% 58.77/59.46  cnf(1109,plain,
% 58.77/59.46     (P4(a5,a2)+P4(a6,a10)),
% 58.77/59.46     inference(scs_inference,[],[42,491])).
% 58.77/59.46  cnf(1201,plain,
% 58.77/59.46     (~P4(a6,a8)+~P2(a10)+~P4(a6,a9)),
% 58.77/59.46     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,3,5,43,48])).
% 58.77/59.46  cnf(58018,plain,
% 58.77/59.46     (P4(a6,a8)),
% 58.77/59.46     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,39,16,12,11,47])).
% 58.77/59.46  cnf(58022,plain,
% 58.77/59.46     (~P4(a6,a9)+~P2(a10)),
% 58.77/59.46     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,39,3,16,12,11,47,48,1201])).
% 58.77/59.46  cnf(58028,plain,
% 58.77/59.46     (~P4(a6,a2)+P4(a5,a2)),
% 58.77/59.46     inference(scs_inference,[],[58018,3,4,2,48,491,893,1109])).
% 58.77/59.46  cnf(58039,plain,
% 58.77/59.46     (~P4(a6,a10)+~P4(a6,a9)),
% 58.77/59.46     inference(scs_inference,[],[38,5,58018,3,4,14,13,47,48])).
% 58.77/59.46  cnf(58050,plain,
% 58.77/59.46     (P4(a6,a7)+~P2(a10)),
% 58.77/59.46     inference(scs_inference,[],[40,36,15,14,47,58022])).
% 58.77/59.46  cnf(58066,plain,
% 58.77/59.46     (P4(a5,a1)),
% 58.77/59.46     inference(scs_inference,[],[20,38,13,14,11,47])).
% 58.77/59.46  cnf(58093,plain,
% 58.77/59.46     (P4(a5,a8)),
% 58.77/59.46     inference(scs_inference,[],[29,38,12,13,14,47])).
% 58.77/59.46  cnf(58110,plain,
% 58.77/59.46     (~P4(a5,a2)),
% 58.77/59.46     inference(scs_inference,[],[58093,1,58066,3,2,48])).
% 58.77/59.46  cnf(58112,plain,
% 58.77/59.46     (P2(a10)),
% 58.77/59.46     inference(scs_inference,[],[58093,1,58066,3,2,48,429])).
% 58.77/59.46  cnf(58124,plain,
% 58.77/59.46     (~P4(a6,a9)),
% 58.77/59.46     inference(scs_inference,[],[35,58093,1,58066,38,3,13,14,2,48,429,41,43,42,45,47,58050,58039])).
% 58.77/59.46  cnf(58125,plain,
% 58.77/59.46     (~P4(a6,a2)),
% 58.77/59.46     inference(scs_inference,[],[35,58093,1,58066,38,3,13,14,2,48,429,41,43,42,45,47,58050,58039,58028])).
% 58.77/59.46  cnf(58131,plain,
% 58.77/59.46     ($false),
% 58.77/59.46     inference(scs_inference,[],[58125,58124,58110,58112,25,40,14,45,47]),
% 58.77/59.46     ['proof']).
% 58.88/59.54  % SZS output end Proof
% 58.88/59.54  % Total time :58.060000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------