↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : PUZ019-1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v5.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:02:39 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.28s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.28s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :   27
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   88 (  42 unt;  13 nHn;  86 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  185 (   0 equ; 116 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;  12 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   89 (  48 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(pete_is_not_educated,hypothesis,
    ~ educated(pete),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pete_is_not_educated) ).

cnf(police_is_educated,axiom,
    ( educated(X1)
    | ~ has_job(X1,police) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',police_is_educated) ).

cnf(males_are_not_female,axiom,
    ( ~ male(X1)
    | ~ female(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',males_are_not_female) ).

cnf(chef_is_female,axiom,
    ( female(X1)
    | ~ has_job(X1,chef) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',chef_is_female) ).

cnf(chef_is_not_also_police,axiom,
    ( ~ has_job(X1,chef)
    | ~ has_job(X1,police) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',chef_is_not_also_police) ).

cnf(every_job_is_used,hypothesis,
    ( has_job(roberta,X1)
    | has_job(thelma,X1)
    | has_job(pete,X1)
    | has_job(steve,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',every_job_is_used) ).

cnf(roberta_is_not_police,hypothesis,
    ~ has_job(roberta,police),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',roberta_is_not_police) ).

cnf(pete_is_male,hypothesis,
    male(pete),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pete_is_male) ).

cnf(steve_is_male,hypothesis,
    male(steve),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',steve_is_male) ).

cnf(thelma_is_female,hypothesis,
    female(thelma),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thelma_is_female) ).

cnf(roberta_is_female,hypothesis,
    female(roberta),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',roberta_is_female) ).

cnf(roberta_is_not_chef,hypothesis,
    ~ has_job(roberta,chef),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',roberta_is_not_chef) ).

cnf(nurse_is_male,axiom,
    ( male(X1)
    | ~ has_job(X1,nurse) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',nurse_is_male) ).

cnf(nurse_is_educated,axiom,
    ( educated(X1)
    | ~ has_job(X1,nurse) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',nurse_is_educated) ).

cnf(each_has_maximum_of_two_jobs,hypothesis,
    ( equal_jobs(X2,X3)
    | equal_jobs(X2,X4)
    | equal_jobs(X3,X4)
    | ~ has_job(X1,X2)
    | ~ has_job(X1,X3)
    | ~ has_job(X1,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',each_has_maximum_of_two_jobs) ).

cnf(actor_is_male,axiom,
    ( male(X1)
    | ~ has_job(X1,actor) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',actor_is_male) ).

cnf(nurse_not_police,axiom,
    ~ equal_jobs(nurse,police),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',nurse_not_police) ).

cnf(symmetry_of_equal_jobs,axiom,
    ( equal_jobs(X2,X1)
    | ~ equal_jobs(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetry_of_equal_jobs) ).

cnf(nurse_not_actor,axiom,
    ~ equal_jobs(nurse,actor),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',nurse_not_actor) ).

cnf(husband_is_male,axiom,
    ( male(X2)
    | ~ husband(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',husband_is_male) ).

cnf(husband_of_chef_is_operator1,hypothesis,
    ( husband(X1,X2)
    | ~ has_job(X1,chef)
    | ~ has_job(X2,operator) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',husband_of_chef_is_operator1) ).

cnf(find_who_has_each_job,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ has_job(X1,chef)
    | ~ has_job(X2,guard)
    | ~ has_job(X3,nurse)
    | ~ has_job(X4,operator)
    | ~ has_job(X5,police)
    | ~ has_job(X6,teacher)
    | ~ has_job(X7,actor)
    | ~ has_job(X8,boxer) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',find_who_has_each_job) ).

cnf(roberta_is_not_boxer,hypothesis,
    ~ has_job(roberta,boxer),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',roberta_is_not_boxer) ).

cnf(police_not_actor,axiom,
    ~ equal_jobs(police,actor),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',police_not_actor) ).

cnf(teacher_is_educated,axiom,
    ( educated(X1)
    | ~ has_job(X1,teacher) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',teacher_is_educated) ).

cnf(operator_not_police,axiom,
    ~ equal_jobs(operator,police),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',operator_not_police) ).

cnf(nurse_not_operator,axiom,
    ~ equal_jobs(nurse,operator),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',nurse_not_operator) ).

cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
    ~ educated(pete),
    pete_is_not_educated ).

cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
    ( educated(X1)
    | ~ has_job(X1,police) ),
    police_is_educated ).

cnf(c_0_29,axiom,
    ( ~ male(X1)
    | ~ female(X1) ),
    males_are_not_female ).

cnf(c_0_30,axiom,
    ( female(X1)
    | ~ has_job(X1,chef) ),
    chef_is_female ).

cnf(c_0_31,axiom,
    ( ~ has_job(X1,chef)
    | ~ has_job(X1,police) ),
    chef_is_not_also_police ).

cnf(c_0_32,hypothesis,
    ( has_job(roberta,X1)
    | has_job(thelma,X1)
    | has_job(pete,X1)
    | has_job(steve,X1) ),
    every_job_is_used ).

cnf(c_0_33,hypothesis,
    ~ has_job(roberta,police),
    roberta_is_not_police ).

cnf(c_0_34,hypothesis,
    ~ has_job(pete,police),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ male(X1)
    | ~ has_job(X1,chef) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,hypothesis,
    male(pete),
    pete_is_male ).

cnf(c_0_37,hypothesis,
    male(steve),
    steve_is_male ).

cnf(c_0_38,hypothesis,
    female(thelma),
    thelma_is_female ).

cnf(c_0_39,hypothesis,
    female(roberta),
    roberta_is_female ).

cnf(c_0_40,hypothesis,
    ( has_job(steve,police)
    | ~ has_job(thelma,chef) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33]),c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,hypothesis,
    ~ has_job(roberta,chef),
    roberta_is_not_chef ).

cnf(c_0_42,hypothesis,
    ~ has_job(pete,chef),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,hypothesis,
    ~ has_job(steve,chef),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,hypothesis,
    ~ male(thelma),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,axiom,
    ( male(X1)
    | ~ has_job(X1,nurse) ),
    nurse_is_male ).

cnf(c_0_46,hypothesis,
    ~ male(roberta),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,axiom,
    ( educated(X1)
    | ~ has_job(X1,nurse) ),
    nurse_is_educated ).

cnf(c_0_48,hypothesis,
    ( equal_jobs(X2,X3)
    | equal_jobs(X2,X4)
    | equal_jobs(X3,X4)
    | ~ has_job(X1,X2)
    | ~ has_job(X1,X3)
    | ~ has_job(X1,X4) ),
    each_has_maximum_of_two_jobs ).

cnf(c_0_49,hypothesis,
    has_job(steve,police),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_32]),c_0_41]),c_0_42]),c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,hypothesis,
    ~ has_job(thelma,nurse),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,hypothesis,
    ~ has_job(roberta,nurse),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,hypothesis,
    ~ has_job(pete,nurse),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,axiom,
    ( male(X1)
    | ~ has_job(X1,actor) ),
    actor_is_male ).

cnf(c_0_54,hypothesis,
    ( equal_jobs(X1,police)
    | equal_jobs(X2,police)
    | equal_jobs(X1,X2)
    | ~ has_job(steve,X2)
    | ~ has_job(steve,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,hypothesis,
    has_job(steve,nurse),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_32]),c_0_51]),c_0_52]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,axiom,
    ~ equal_jobs(nurse,police),
    nurse_not_police ).

cnf(c_0_57,hypothesis,
    ~ has_job(thelma,actor),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,hypothesis,
    ~ has_job(roberta,actor),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,hypothesis,
    ( equal_jobs(X1,nurse)
    | equal_jobs(X1,police)
    | ~ has_job(steve,X1) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]),c_0_56]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,hypothesis,
    ( has_job(steve,actor)
    | has_job(pete,actor) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_32]),c_0_58]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,axiom,
    ( equal_jobs(X2,X1)
    | ~ equal_jobs(X1,X2) ),
    symmetry_of_equal_jobs ).

cnf(c_0_62,hypothesis,
    ( has_job(pete,actor)
    | equal_jobs(actor,police)
    | equal_jobs(actor,nurse) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_60]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,axiom,
    ~ equal_jobs(nurse,actor),
    nurse_not_actor ).

cnf(c_0_64,axiom,
    ( male(X2)
    | ~ husband(X1,X2) ),
    husband_is_male ).

cnf(c_0_65,hypothesis,
    ( husband(X1,X2)
    | ~ has_job(X1,chef)
    | ~ has_job(X2,operator) ),
    husband_of_chef_is_operator1 ).

cnf(c_0_66,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ has_job(X1,chef)
    | ~ has_job(X2,guard)
    | ~ has_job(X3,nurse)
    | ~ has_job(X4,operator)
    | ~ has_job(X5,police)
    | ~ has_job(X6,teacher)
    | ~ has_job(X7,actor)
    | ~ has_job(X8,boxer) ),
    find_who_has_each_job ).

cnf(c_0_67,hypothesis,
    ~ has_job(roberta,boxer),
    roberta_is_not_boxer ).

cnf(c_0_68,hypothesis,
    ( has_job(pete,actor)
    | equal_jobs(actor,police) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_62]),c_0_63]) ).

cnf(c_0_69,axiom,
    ~ equal_jobs(police,actor),
    police_not_actor ).

cnf(c_0_70,hypothesis,
    ( male(X1)
    | ~ has_job(X1,operator)
    | ~ has_job(X2,chef) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65]) ).

cnf(c_0_71,hypothesis,
    ( ~ has_job(X1,actor)
    | ~ has_job(X2,teacher)
    | ~ has_job(X3,police)
    | ~ has_job(X4,operator)
    | ~ has_job(X5,nurse)
    | ~ has_job(X6,guard)
    | ~ has_job(X7,chef) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_66,c_0_32]),c_0_67]),c_0_66]),c_0_66]) ).

cnf(c_0_72,hypothesis,
    has_job(pete,actor),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_68]),c_0_69]) ).

cnf(c_0_73,axiom,
    ( educated(X1)
    | ~ has_job(X1,teacher) ),
    teacher_is_educated ).

cnf(c_0_74,hypothesis,
    ( has_job(steve,operator)
    | has_job(pete,operator)
    | has_job(roberta,operator)
    | ~ has_job(X1,chef) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_70,c_0_32]),c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_75,hypothesis,
    ( ~ has_job(X1,teacher)
    | ~ has_job(X2,police)
    | ~ has_job(X3,operator)
    | ~ has_job(X4,nurse)
    | ~ has_job(X5,guard)
    | ~ has_job(X6,chef) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_71,c_0_72]) ).

cnf(c_0_76,hypothesis,
    ~ has_job(pete,teacher),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_73]) ).

cnf(c_0_77,hypothesis,
    ( has_job(roberta,operator)
    | has_job(pete,operator)
    | has_job(steve,operator) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_32]),c_0_41]),c_0_42]),c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_78,axiom,
    ~ equal_jobs(operator,police),
    operator_not_police ).

cnf(c_0_79,hypothesis,
    ( ~ has_job(X1,police)
    | ~ has_job(X2,operator)
    | ~ has_job(X3,nurse)
    | ~ has_job(X4,guard)
    | ~ has_job(X5,chef) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_75,c_0_32]),c_0_76]),c_0_75]),c_0_75]) ).

cnf(c_0_80,hypothesis,
    ( has_job(pete,operator)
    | has_job(roberta,operator)
    | equal_jobs(operator,nurse) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_77]),c_0_78]) ).

cnf(c_0_81,axiom,
    ~ equal_jobs(nurse,operator),
    nurse_not_operator ).

cnf(c_0_82,hypothesis,
    ( ~ has_job(X1,operator)
    | ~ has_job(X2,nurse)
    | ~ has_job(X3,guard)
    | ~ has_job(X4,chef) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_79,c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_83,hypothesis,
    ( has_job(roberta,operator)
    | has_job(pete,operator) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_80]),c_0_81]) ).

cnf(c_0_84,hypothesis,
    ( ~ has_job(X1,nurse)
    | ~ has_job(X2,guard)
    | ~ has_job(X3,chef) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_82,c_0_83]),c_0_82]) ).

cnf(c_0_85,hypothesis,
    ( ~ has_job(X1,guard)
    | ~ has_job(X2,chef) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_84,c_0_55]) ).

cnf(c_0_86,hypothesis,
    ~ has_job(X1,chef),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_85,c_0_32]),c_0_85]),c_0_85]),c_0_85]) ).

cnf(c_0_87,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_86,c_0_32]),c_0_41]),c_0_42]),c_0_43]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : PUZ019-1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v5.1.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 01:32:39 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.28/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.28/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.28/1.72  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.28/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.28/1.72  % Total time : 1.370s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------