↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : PUZ021-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:01:35 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   19
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   55 (   7 unt;  19 nHn;  31 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  119 (   0 equ;  56 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  111 (  25 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(conjunction1,axiom,
    ( ~ a_truth(and(X1,X2),X3)
    | a_truth(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conjunction1) ).

cnf(knaves_lie2,axiom,
    ( ~ a_truth(knave(X1),X2)
    | a_truth(X3,X2)
    | says(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',knaves_lie2) ).

cnf(prove_statement_exists2,negated_conjecture,
    ( a_truth(and(knave(me),rich(me)),X1)
    | says(me,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_statement_exists2) ).

cnf(not_knight_and_knave,axiom,
    ( ~ a_truth(knave(X1),X2)
    | ~ a_truth(knight(X1),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_knight_and_knave) ).

cnf(knaves_lie1,axiom,
    ( ~ a_truth(X3,X2)
    | ~ says(X1,X3)
    | ~ a_truth(knave(X1),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',knaves_lie1) ).

cnf(knights_tell_truth1,axiom,
    ( ~ says(X1,X3)
    | ~ a_truth(knight(X1),X2)
    | a_truth(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',knights_tell_truth1) ).

cnf(knight_or_knave,axiom,
    ( a_truth(knave(X1),X2)
    | a_truth(knight(X1),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',knight_or_knave) ).

cnf(conjunction2,axiom,
    ( ~ a_truth(and(X1,X2),X3)
    | a_truth(X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conjunction2) ).

cnf(prove_statement_exists1,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ a_truth(and(knave(me),rich(me)),X1)
    | ~ says(me,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_statement_exists1) ).

cnf(conjunction3,axiom,
    ( ~ a_truth(X2,X3)
    | ~ a_truth(X1,X3)
    | a_truth(and(X1,X2),X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conjunction3) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(and(X1,X2),X3)
    | a_truth(X1,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[conjunction1]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(knave(X1),X2)
    | a_truth(X3,X2)
    | says(X1,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[knaves_lie2]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(and(X1,X2),X3)
    | a_truth(X1,X3) ),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( a_truth(and(knave(me),rich(me)),X1)
    | says(me,X1) ),
    prove_statement_exists2 ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(knave(X1),X2)
    | a_truth(X3,X2)
    | says(X1,X3) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( a_truth(knave(me),X1)
    | says(me,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(knave(X1),X2)
    | ~ a_truth(knight(X1),X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_knight_and_knave]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( a_truth(X2,X1)
    | says(me,X2)
    | says(me,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(X3,X2)
    | ~ says(X1,X3)
    | ~ a_truth(knave(X1),X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[knaves_lie1]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(knave(X1),X2)
    | ~ a_truth(knight(X1),X2) ),
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( a_truth(X1,X1)
    | says(me,X1) ),
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(X3,X2)
    | ~ says(X1,X3)
    | ~ a_truth(knave(X1),X2) ),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ a_truth(knave(X1),knight(X1))
    | says(me,knight(X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ says(X1,X3)
    | ~ a_truth(knight(X1),X2)
    | a_truth(X3,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[knights_tell_truth1]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ a_truth(X2,X1)
    | ~ says(me,X2)
    | says(me,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    says(me,knight(me)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ says(X1,X3)
    | ~ a_truth(knight(X1),X2)
    | a_truth(X3,X2) ),
    c_0_23 ).

cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
    ( a_truth(knave(X1),X2)
    | a_truth(knight(X1),X2) ),
    knight_or_knave ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ a_truth(knight(me),X1)
    | says(me,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( a_truth(X1,and(X1,X2))
    | says(me,and(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(and(X1,X2),X3)
    | a_truth(X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[conjunction2]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ says(X1,X3)
    | a_truth(X3,X2)
    | a_truth(knave(X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    says(me,and(knight(me),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(and(X1,X2),X3)
    | a_truth(X2,X3) ),
    c_0_30 ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( a_truth(knave(me),X2)
    | a_truth(and(knight(me),X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( a_truth(X2,X1)
    | a_truth(knave(me),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    a_truth(knave(me),X1),
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ a_truth(and(knave(me),rich(me)),X1)
    | ~ says(me,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_statement_exists1]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(X2,X3)
    | ~ a_truth(X1,X3)
    | a_truth(and(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[conjunction3]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ a_truth(X1,X2)
    | ~ says(me,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( a_truth(X1,X2)
    | says(me,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ a_truth(X2,X1)
    | a_truth(X2,X2)
    | says(me,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ( a_truth(rich(me),X1)
    | says(me,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ a_truth(and(knave(me),rich(me)),X1)
    | ~ says(me,X1) ),
    c_0_37 ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(X2,X3)
    | ~ a_truth(X1,X3)
    | a_truth(and(X1,X2),X3) ),
    c_0_38 ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ a_truth(X1,X3)
    | a_truth(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    ( a_truth(rich(me),rich(me))
    | says(me,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ a_truth(rich(me),X1)
    | ~ says(me,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]),c_0_36])]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    ( a_truth(rich(me),X2)
    | says(me,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ a_truth(and(knight(me),X2),X1)
    | says(me,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ says(me,X2)
    | says(me,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    says(me,and(and(knight(me),X1),X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    says(me,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    ~ a_truth(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_52])]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_53]),c_0_53]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : PUZ021-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 03:45:21 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.43  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % new_bool_3 with pid 1616150 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.12/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.12/0.43  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.12/0.43  % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.43  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1616159 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.12/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.12/0.43  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.12/0.43  % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.43  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.43  
% 0.12/0.43  % Proof found!
% 0.12/0.43  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.12/0.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.43  % Parsed axioms                        : 13
% 0.12/0.43  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2
% 0.12/0.43  % Initial clauses                      : 11
% 0.12/0.43  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 11
% 0.12/0.43  % Processed clauses                    : 70
% 0.12/0.43  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % ...subsumed                          : 13
% 0.12/0.43  % ...remaining for further processing  : 57
% 0.12/0.43  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Backward-subsumed                    : 29
% 0.12/0.43  % Backward-rewritten                   : 23
% 0.12/0.43  % Generated clauses                    : 389
% 0.12/0.43  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 320
% 0.12/0.43  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Paramodulations                      : 373
% 0.12/0.43  % Factorizations                       : 14
% 0.12/0.43  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Total rewrite steps                  : 80
% 0.12/0.43  % ...of those cached                   : 48
% 0.12/0.43  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  % Current number of processed clauses  : 3
% 0.12/0.43  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.12/0.43  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.43  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.12/0.43  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
% 0.12/0.43  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 228
% 0.12/0.43  % ...number of literals in the above   : 675
% 0.12/0.43  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Current number of archived clauses   : 54
% 0.12/0.43  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 133
% 0.12/0.43  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 118
% 0.12/0.43  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 20
% 0.12/0.43  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 27
% 0.12/0.43  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 18
% 0.12/0.43  % BW rewrite match successes           : 16
% 0.12/0.43  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 4186
% 0.12/0.43  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 32
% 0.12/0.43  
% 0.12/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.43  % User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.12/0.43  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.12/0.43  % Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.12/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.12/0.43  
% 0.12/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.43  % User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.12/0.43  % System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.12/0.43  % Total time               : 0.018 s
% 0.12/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.12/0.43  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------