↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : PUZ027-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:02:19 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.26s 0.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   47 (  14 unt;   4 nHn;  43 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  100 (   0 equ;  69 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   9 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(liars_lie,axiom,
    ( ~ a_truth(X2)
    | ~ a_truth(says(X1,X2))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/PUZ003-0.ax',liars_lie) ).

cnf(a_and_b_normal,hypothesis,
    ( ~ a_truth(normal(b))
    | ~ a_truth(normal(a))
    | answer(a_and_b_normal) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_and_b_normal) ).

cnf(prove_there_is_an_answer,negated_conjecture,
    ~ answer(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_there_is_an_answer) ).

cnf(b_says_a_not_lower_than_b,hypothesis,
    a_truth(says(b,not_lower(a,b))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_says_a_not_lower_than_b) ).

cnf(no_one_lower_than_liars,axiom,
    ( ~ a_truth(liar(X2))
    | ~ a_truth(lower(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',no_one_lower_than_liars) ).

cnf(a_normal_b_truthteller,hypothesis,
    ( ~ a_truth(truthteller(b))
    | ~ a_truth(normal(a))
    | answer(a_normal_b_truthteller) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_normal_b_truthteller) ).

cnf(not_lower_or_lower,axiom,
    ( a_truth(lower(X1,X2))
    | a_truth(not_lower(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_lower_or_lower) ).

cnf(truthtellers_tell_truth,axiom,
    ( ~ a_truth(says(X1,X2))
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(X1))
    | a_truth(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/PUZ003-0.ax',truthtellers_tell_truth) ).

cnf(truthtellers_lower_than_no_one,axiom,
    ( ~ a_truth(truthteller(X1))
    | ~ a_truth(lower(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',truthtellers_lower_than_no_one) ).

cnf(a_liar_b_normal,hypothesis,
    ( ~ a_truth(normal(b))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(a))
    | answer(a_liar_b_normal) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_liar_b_normal) ).

cnf(person_is_one_type,axiom,
    ( a_truth(normal(X1))
    | a_truth(liar(X1))
    | a_truth(truthteller(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/PUZ003-0.ax',person_is_one_type) ).

cnf(a_says_a_lower_than_b,hypothesis,
    a_truth(says(a,lower(a,b))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_says_a_lower_than_b) ).

cnf(a_liar_b_truthteller,hypothesis,
    ( ~ a_truth(truthteller(b))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(a))
    | answer(a_liar_b_truthteller) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_liar_b_truthteller) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(X2)
    | ~ a_truth(says(X1,X2))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(X1)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[liars_lie]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    ( ~ a_truth(normal(b))
    | ~ a_truth(normal(a))
    | answer(a_and_b_normal) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[a_and_b_normal]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ answer(X1),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_there_is_an_answer]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(X2)
    | ~ a_truth(says(X1,X2))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(X1)) ),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    a_truth(says(b,not_lower(a,b))),
    b_says_a_not_lower_than_b ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(liar(X2))
    | ~ a_truth(lower(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[no_one_lower_than_liars]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
    ( ~ a_truth(truthteller(b))
    | ~ a_truth(normal(a))
    | answer(a_normal_b_truthteller) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[a_normal_b_truthteller]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
    ( ~ a_truth(normal(b))
    | ~ a_truth(normal(a))
    | answer(a_and_b_normal) ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ answer(X1),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
    ( ~ a_truth(liar(b))
    | ~ a_truth(not_lower(a,b)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
    ( a_truth(lower(X1,X2))
    | a_truth(not_lower(X1,X2)) ),
    not_lower_or_lower ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(liar(X2))
    | ~ a_truth(lower(X1,X2)) ),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
    ( ~ a_truth(truthteller(b))
    | ~ a_truth(normal(a))
    | answer(a_normal_b_truthteller) ),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(says(X1,X2))
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(X1))
    | a_truth(X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[truthtellers_tell_truth]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(truthteller(X1))
    | ~ a_truth(lower(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[truthtellers_lower_than_no_one]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,hypothesis,
    ( ~ a_truth(normal(b))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(a))
    | answer(a_liar_b_normal) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[a_liar_b_normal]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,hypothesis,
    ( ~ a_truth(normal(b))
    | ~ a_truth(normal(a)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,axiom,
    ( a_truth(normal(X1))
    | a_truth(liar(X1))
    | a_truth(truthteller(X1)) ),
    person_is_one_type ).

cnf(c_0_31,hypothesis,
    ~ a_truth(liar(b)),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,hypothesis,
    ( ~ a_truth(normal(a))
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(b)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(says(X1,X2))
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(X1))
    | a_truth(X2) ),
    c_0_26 ).

cnf(c_0_34,hypothesis,
    a_truth(says(a,lower(a,b))),
    a_says_a_lower_than_b ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(truthteller(X1))
    | ~ a_truth(lower(X1,X2)) ),
    c_0_27 ).

cnf(c_0_36,hypothesis,
    ( ~ a_truth(truthteller(b))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(a))
    | answer(a_liar_b_truthteller) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[a_liar_b_truthteller]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,hypothesis,
    ( ~ a_truth(normal(b))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(a))
    | answer(a_liar_b_normal) ),
    c_0_28 ).

cnf(c_0_38,hypothesis,
    ~ a_truth(normal(a)),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,hypothesis,
    ~ a_truth(truthteller(a)),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,hypothesis,
    ( ~ a_truth(truthteller(b))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(a))
    | answer(a_liar_b_truthteller) ),
    c_0_36 ).

cnf(c_0_41,hypothesis,
    ( ~ a_truth(normal(b))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(a)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,hypothesis,
    a_truth(liar(a)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_30]),c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,hypothesis,
    ( ~ a_truth(liar(a))
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(b)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,hypothesis,
    ~ a_truth(normal(b)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42])]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,hypothesis,
    ~ a_truth(truthteller(b)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_42])]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_30]),c_0_31]),c_0_45]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : PUZ027-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.43  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.43  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 03:45:07 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.44  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.50  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/0.53  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.26/0.53  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.53  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.53  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.53  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53  % new_bool_3 with pid 4071126 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.53  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.26/0.53  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.53  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.53  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.53  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.26/0.53  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.26/0.53  % Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.53  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.53  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53  % SubtermCWHack with pid 4071129 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.53  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.26/0.53  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.53  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.53  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.53  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.26/0.53  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.26/0.53  % Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.53  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.53  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.26/0.53  
% 0.26/0.53  % Proof found!
% 0.26/0.53  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.26/0.53  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/0.53  % Parsed axioms                        : 32
% 0.26/0.53  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.26/0.53  % Initial clauses                      : 32
% 0.26/0.53  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.26/0.53  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 32
% 0.26/0.53  % Processed clauses                    : 38
% 0.26/0.53  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.26/0.53  % ...subsumed                          : 2
% 0.26/0.53  % ...remaining for further processing  : 35
% 0.26/0.53  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.26/0.53  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.26/0.53  % Backward-subsumed                    : 10
% 0.26/0.53  % Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 0.26/0.53  % Generated clauses                    : 21
% 0.26/0.53  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 21
% 0.26/0.53  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.26/0.53  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3
% 0.26/0.53  % Paramodulations                      : 21
% 0.26/0.53  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.26/0.53  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.26/0.53  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.26/0.53  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.26/0.53  % Total rewrite steps                  : 3
% 0.26/0.53  % ...of those cached                   : 2
% 0.26/0.53  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.26/0.53  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.26/0.53  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/0.53  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.26/0.53  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/0.53  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.26/0.53  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53  % Current number of processed clauses  : 22
% 0.26/0.53  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 0.26/0.53  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.53  %    Negative unit clauses             : 7
% 0.26/0.53  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 11
% 0.26/0.53  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 14
% 0.26/0.53  % ...number of literals in the above   : 44
% 0.26/0.53  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.26/0.53  % Current number of archived clauses   : 13
% 0.26/0.53  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 42
% 0.26/0.53  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 37
% 0.26/0.53  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
% 0.26/0.53  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20
% 0.26/0.53  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.26/0.53  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.26/0.53  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.26/0.53  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.26/0.53  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.26/0.53  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1412
% 0.26/0.53  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 73
% 0.26/0.53  
% 0.26/0.53  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.53  % User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.26/0.53  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.26/0.53  % Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.26/0.53  % Maximum resident set size: 3608 pages
% 0.26/0.53  
% 0.26/0.53  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.53  % User time                : 0.009 s
% 0.26/0.53  % System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.26/0.53  % Total time               : 0.017 s
% 0.26/0.53  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.26/0.53  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------