↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : PUZ027-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:32:44 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.67s 1.27s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   44 (  12 unt;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  109 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  117 (  62   ~;  55   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   4 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;  11 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   0 sgn   4   !;   0   ?;   2   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( a_truth(normal(X0))
      | a_truth(liar(X0))
      | a_truth(truthteller(X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/PUZ003-0.ax',person_is_one_type) ).

fof(f23,axiom,
    ( answer(a_and_b_truthteller)
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(b))
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(a)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_and_b_truthteller) ).

fof(f24,axiom,
    ( answer(a_truthteller_b_normal)
    | ~ a_truth(normal(b))
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(a)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_truthteller_b_normal) ).

fof(f25,axiom,
    ( answer(a_truthteller_b_liar)
    | ~ a_truth(liar(b))
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(a)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_truthteller_b_liar) ).

fof(f26,axiom,
    ( answer(a_normal_b_truthteller)
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(b))
    | ~ a_truth(normal(a)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_normal_b_truthteller) ).

fof(f27,axiom,
    ( answer(a_and_b_normal)
    | ~ a_truth(normal(b))
    | ~ a_truth(normal(a)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_and_b_normal) ).

fof(f28,axiom,
    ( answer(a_normal_b_liar)
    | ~ a_truth(liar(b))
    | ~ a_truth(normal(a)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_normal_b_liar) ).

fof(f29,axiom,
    ( answer(a_liar_b_truthteller)
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(b))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(a)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_liar_b_truthteller) ).

fof(f30,axiom,
    ( answer(a_liar_b_normal)
    | ~ a_truth(normal(b))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(a)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_liar_b_normal) ).

fof(f31,axiom,
    ( answer(a_and_b_liar)
    | ~ a_truth(liar(b))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(a)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_and_b_liar) ).

fof(f32,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] : ~ answer(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_there_is_an_answer) ).

tcf(c_81,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( a_truth(truthteller(X0))
      | a_truth(normal(X0))
      | a_truth(liar(X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_103,plain,
    ( answer(a_and_b_truthteller)
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(b))
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(a)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

tcf(c_104,plain,
    ( answer(a_truthteller_b_normal)
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(a))
    | ~ a_truth(normal(b)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

tcf(c_105,plain,
    ( answer(a_truthteller_b_liar)
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(a))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(b)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

tcf(c_106,plain,
    ( answer(a_normal_b_truthteller)
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(b))
    | ~ a_truth(normal(a)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

tcf(c_107,plain,
    ( answer(a_and_b_normal)
    | ~ a_truth(normal(b))
    | ~ a_truth(normal(a)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

tcf(c_108,plain,
    ( answer(a_normal_b_liar)
    | ~ a_truth(normal(a))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(b)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

tcf(c_109,plain,
    ( answer(a_liar_b_truthteller)
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(b))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(a)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

tcf(c_110,plain,
    ( answer(a_liar_b_normal)
    | ~ a_truth(normal(b))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(a)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

tcf(c_111,plain,
    ( answer(a_and_b_liar)
    | ~ a_truth(liar(b))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(a)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).

tcf(c_112,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : ~ answer(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

tcf(c_120,plain,
    ( a_truth(truthteller(a))
    | a_truth(normal(a))
    | a_truth(liar(a)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_81]) ).

tcf(c_205,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(normal(b))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(a)) ),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_112]) ).

tcf(c_206,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(normal(a))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(b)) ),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_108,c_112]) ).

tcf(c_207,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(truthteller(b))
    | ~ a_truth(normal(a)) ),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_106,c_112]) ).

tcf(c_208,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(normal(b))
    | ~ a_truth(normal(a)) ),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_107,c_112]) ).

tcf(c_209,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(truthteller(a))
    | ~ a_truth(normal(b)) ),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_104,c_112]) ).

tcf(c_210,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(truthteller(a))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(b)) ),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_105,c_112]) ).

tcf(c_211,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(truthteller(b))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(a)) ),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_109,c_112]) ).

tcf(c_212,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(liar(b))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(a)) ),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_111,c_112]) ).

tcf(c_213,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(truthteller(b))
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(a)) ),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_103,c_112]) ).

tcf(c_214,plain,
    ~ a_truth(truthteller(b)),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_207,c_120,c_213,c_211,c_207]) ).

tcf(c_216,plain,
    ~ a_truth(liar(b)),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_206,c_120,c_212,c_210,c_206]) ).

tcf(c_218,plain,
    ~ a_truth(normal(b)),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_205,c_120,c_209,c_208,c_205]) ).

tcf(c_508,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = normal(b),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_509,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = liar(b),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_510,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = truthteller(b),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_511,plain,
    ~ a_truth(iPr_def_10),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_218,c_508]) ).

tcf(c_512,plain,
    ~ a_truth(iPr_def_11),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_216,c_509]) ).

tcf(c_513,plain,
    ~ a_truth(iPr_def_12),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_214,c_510]) ).

tcf(c_1030,plain,
    ( a_truth(iPr_def_12)
    | a_truth(normal(b))
    | a_truth(liar(b)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_510,c_81]) ).

tcf(c_1031,plain,
    ( a_truth(iPr_def_12)
    | a_truth(iPr_def_11)
    | a_truth(iPr_def_10) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1030,c_508,c_509]) ).

tcf(c_1032,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1031,c_513,c_512,c_511]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : PUZ027-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 06:41:59 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.41  
% 0.10/0.41  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.41  
% 0.10/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.42  % Proving...
% 1.67/1.27  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.67/1.27  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.67/1.27  
% 1.67/1.27  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.67/1.27  
% 1.67/1.27  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.67/1.27  
% 1.67/1.27  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.67/1.27  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.67/1.27  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.67/1.27  
% 1.67/1.27  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.67/1.27  
% 1.67/1.27  
% 1.67/1.27  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.67/1.27  
% 1.67/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.67/1.27  
% 1.67/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 1.67/1.27  
% 1.67/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.67/1.27  % ------ Proving...
% 1.67/1.27  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.67/1.27  
% 1.67/1.27  % 
% 1.67/1.27  % clauses                               28
% 1.67/1.27  % conjectures                           0
% 1.67/1.27  % EPR                                   3
% 1.67/1.27  % Horn                                  19
% 1.67/1.27  % unary                                 9
% 1.67/1.27  % binary                                7
% 1.67/1.27  % lits                                  62
% 1.67/1.27  % lits eq                               3
% 1.67/1.27  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.67/1.27  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.67/1.27  % fd_cond                               0
% 1.67/1.27  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 1.67/1.27  % AC symbols                            0
% 1.67/1.27  
% 1.67/1.27  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.67/1.27  
% 1.67/1.27  % ------ no conjectures: strip conj schedule 
% 1.67/1.27  
% 1.67/1.27  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" stripped conjectures Time Limit: 10.
% 1.67/1.27  
% 1.67/1.27  
% 1.67/1.27  % ------ 
% 1.67/1.27  % Current options:
% 1.67/1.27  % ------ 
% 1.67/1.27  
% 1.67/1.27  
% 1.67/1.27  % 
% 1.67/1.27  
% 1.67/1.27  % ------ Proving...
% 1.67/1.27  % 
% 1.67/1.27  
% 1.67/1.27  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.67/1.27  
% 1.67/1.27  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.67/1.27  
% 1.67/1.27  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------