↑ Up

Princess---230619.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : PUZ031+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 13:22:51 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 9.20s 1.96s
% Output   : Proof 11.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : PUZ031+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 22:18:05 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.59  ________       _____
% 0.18/0.59  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.18/0.59  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.18/0.59  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.18/0.59  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.18/0.59  
% 0.18/0.59  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.18/0.59  (2023-06-19)
% 0.18/0.59  
% 0.18/0.59  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.18/0.59  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.18/0.59                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.18/0.59  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.18/0.59  
% 0.18/0.59  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.18/0.59  
% 0.18/0.59  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.18/0.60  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.68/0.61  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.68/0.61  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.68/0.61  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.68/0.61  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.68/0.61  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.68/0.61  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 0.68/0.61  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 2.16/1.00  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.16/1.00  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.67/1.04  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.67/1.04  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.67/1.04  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.67/1.04  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.67/1.04  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 4.34/1.24  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.34/1.24  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 4.90/1.33  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 4.90/1.33  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.90/1.36  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.47/1.57  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 6.47/1.58  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.54/1.74  Prover 1: gave up
% 7.54/1.74  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 7.54/1.74  Prover 3: gave up
% 7.54/1.76  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 8.37/1.79  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 8.37/1.80  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 8.65/1.85  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.20/1.92  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 9.20/1.93  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.20/1.95  Prover 2: proved (1346ms)
% 9.20/1.95  
% 9.20/1.96  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.20/1.96  
% 9.20/1.97  Prover 0: stopped
% 9.20/1.97  Prover 5: stopped
% 9.20/1.97  Prover 6: stopped
% 9.20/1.97  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 9.20/1.97  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 9.20/1.97  Prover 16: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=completeFrugal -randomSeed=-2043353683
% 9.72/1.97  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 9.72/2.01  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 9.72/2.01  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 9.72/2.01  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 9.72/2.02  Prover 16: Preprocessing ...
% 9.72/2.06  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.44/2.07  Prover 16: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.44/2.08  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.95/2.19  Prover 13: Found proof (size 51)
% 10.95/2.19  Prover 13: proved (217ms)
% 10.95/2.19  Prover 4: stopped
% 10.95/2.19  Prover 7: stopped
% 10.95/2.19  Prover 16: stopped
% 10.95/2.19  Prover 10: stopped
% 10.95/2.19  Prover 8: stopped
% 10.95/2.19  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.95/2.20  Prover 11: stopped
% 10.95/2.20  
% 10.95/2.20  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.95/2.20  
% 11.54/2.21  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 11.54/2.22  Assumptions after simplification:
% 11.54/2.22  ---------------------------------
% 11.54/2.22  
% 11.54/2.22    (pel47)
% 11.54/2.22     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |
% 11.54/2.22       ~ eats(v1, v2) |  ~ eats(v0, v1) |  ~ grain(v2) |  ~ animal(v1) |  ~
% 11.54/2.22      animal(v0))
% 11.54/2.22  
% 11.54/2.22    (pel47_10)
% 11.54/2.22     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ fox(v0) |  ~ wolf(v1)
% 11.54/2.22      | much_smaller(v0, v1))
% 11.54/2.22  
% 11.54/2.22    (pel47_11)
% 11.54/2.22     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ eats(v0, v1) |  ~
% 11.54/2.23      grain(v1) |  ~ wolf(v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 11.54/2.23      $i(v0) |  ~ eats(v0, v1) |  ~ fox(v1) |  ~ wolf(v0))
% 11.54/2.23  
% 11.54/2.23    (pel47_13)
% 11.54/2.23     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ eats(v0, v1) |  ~
% 11.54/2.23      snail(v1) |  ~ bird(v0))
% 11.54/2.23  
% 11.54/2.23    (pel47_14)
% 11.54/2.23     ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) |  ~ snail(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] : ($i(v1) & eats(v0, v1)
% 11.54/2.23        & plant(v1))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) |  ~ caterpillar(v0) |  ? [v1:
% 11.54/2.23        $i] : ($i(v1) & eats(v0, v1) & plant(v1)))
% 11.54/2.23  
% 11.54/2.23    (pel47_1_1)
% 11.54/2.23     ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) |  ~ wolf(v0) | animal(v0))
% 11.54/2.23  
% 11.54/2.23    (pel47_1_2)
% 11.54/2.23     ? [v0: $i] : ($i(v0) & wolf(v0))
% 11.54/2.23  
% 11.54/2.23    (pel47_2_1)
% 11.54/2.23     ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) |  ~ fox(v0) | animal(v0))
% 11.54/2.23  
% 11.54/2.23    (pel47_2_2)
% 11.54/2.23     ? [v0: $i] : ($i(v0) & fox(v0))
% 11.54/2.23  
% 11.54/2.23    (pel47_3_1)
% 11.54/2.23     ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) |  ~ bird(v0) | animal(v0))
% 11.54/2.23  
% 11.54/2.23    (pel47_3_2)
% 11.54/2.23     ? [v0: $i] : ($i(v0) & bird(v0))
% 11.54/2.23  
% 11.54/2.23    (pel47_4_2)
% 11.54/2.23     ? [v0: $i] : ($i(v0) & caterpillar(v0))
% 11.54/2.23  
% 11.54/2.23    (pel47_5_1)
% 11.54/2.23     ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) |  ~ snail(v0) | animal(v0))
% 11.54/2.23  
% 11.54/2.23    (pel47_5_2)
% 11.54/2.23     ? [v0: $i] : ($i(v0) & snail(v0))
% 11.54/2.23  
% 11.54/2.23    (pel47_6_1)
% 11.54/2.23     ? [v0: $i] : ($i(v0) & grain(v0))
% 11.54/2.23  
% 11.54/2.23    (pel47_6_2)
% 11.54/2.23     ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) |  ~ grain(v0) | plant(v0))
% 11.54/2.23  
% 11.54/2.23    (pel47_7)
% 11.54/2.23     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2)
% 11.54/2.23      |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ much_smaller(v1, v0) |  ~ eats(v1, v2) |  ~
% 11.54/2.23      plant(v3) |  ~ plant(v2) |  ~ animal(v1) |  ~ animal(v0) | eats(v0, v3) |
% 11.54/2.23      eats(v0, v1))
% 11.54/2.23  
% 11.54/2.23    (pel47_8)
% 11.54/2.23     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ snail(v0) |  ~
% 11.54/2.24      bird(v1) | much_smaller(v0, v1)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | 
% 11.54/2.24      ~ $i(v0) |  ~ caterpillar(v0) |  ~ bird(v1) | much_smaller(v0, v1))
% 11.54/2.24  
% 11.54/2.24    (pel47_9)
% 11.54/2.24     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ bird(v0) |  ~ fox(v1)
% 11.54/2.24      | much_smaller(v0, v1))
% 11.54/2.24  
% 11.54/2.24  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 11.54/2.24  --------------------------------------------
% 11.54/2.24  pel47_12, pel47_4_1
% 11.54/2.24  
% 11.54/2.24  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 11.54/2.24  ---------------------------------
% 11.54/2.24  
% 11.54/2.24  Begin of proof
% 11.54/2.24  | 
% 11.54/2.24  | ALPHA: (pel47_14) implies:
% 11.54/2.24  |   (1)   ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) |  ~ caterpillar(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] : ($i(v1) &
% 11.54/2.24  |            eats(v0, v1) & plant(v1)))
% 11.54/2.24  |   (2)   ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) |  ~ snail(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] : ($i(v1) &
% 11.54/2.24  |            eats(v0, v1) & plant(v1)))
% 11.54/2.24  | 
% 11.54/2.24  | ALPHA: (pel47_11) implies:
% 11.54/2.24  |   (3)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ eats(v0, v1) | 
% 11.54/2.24  |          ~ fox(v1) |  ~ wolf(v0))
% 11.54/2.24  |   (4)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ eats(v0, v1) | 
% 11.54/2.24  |          ~ grain(v1) |  ~ wolf(v0))
% 11.54/2.24  | 
% 11.54/2.24  | ALPHA: (pel47_8) implies:
% 11.54/2.24  |   (5)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ snail(v0) |  ~
% 11.54/2.24  |          bird(v1) | much_smaller(v0, v1))
% 11.54/2.24  | 
% 11.54/2.24  | DELTA: instantiating (pel47_2_2) with fresh symbol all_17_0 gives:
% 11.54/2.24  |   (6)  $i(all_17_0) & fox(all_17_0)
% 11.54/2.24  | 
% 11.54/2.24  | ALPHA: (6) implies:
% 11.54/2.24  |   (7)  fox(all_17_0)
% 11.54/2.24  |   (8)  $i(all_17_0)
% 11.54/2.24  | 
% 11.54/2.24  | DELTA: instantiating (pel47_3_2) with fresh symbol all_19_0 gives:
% 11.54/2.24  |   (9)  $i(all_19_0) & bird(all_19_0)
% 11.54/2.24  | 
% 11.54/2.24  | ALPHA: (9) implies:
% 11.54/2.24  |   (10)  bird(all_19_0)
% 11.54/2.24  |   (11)  $i(all_19_0)
% 11.54/2.24  | 
% 11.54/2.24  | DELTA: instantiating (pel47_1_2) with fresh symbol all_21_0 gives:
% 11.54/2.24  |   (12)  $i(all_21_0) & wolf(all_21_0)
% 11.54/2.24  | 
% 11.54/2.24  | ALPHA: (12) implies:
% 11.54/2.24  |   (13)  wolf(all_21_0)
% 11.54/2.24  |   (14)  $i(all_21_0)
% 11.54/2.24  | 
% 11.54/2.24  | DELTA: instantiating (pel47_4_2) with fresh symbol all_23_0 gives:
% 11.54/2.24  |   (15)  $i(all_23_0) & caterpillar(all_23_0)
% 11.54/2.24  | 
% 11.54/2.24  | ALPHA: (15) implies:
% 11.54/2.24  |   (16)  caterpillar(all_23_0)
% 11.54/2.25  |   (17)  $i(all_23_0)
% 11.54/2.25  | 
% 11.54/2.25  | DELTA: instantiating (pel47_6_1) with fresh symbol all_25_0 gives:
% 11.54/2.25  |   (18)  $i(all_25_0) & grain(all_25_0)
% 11.54/2.25  | 
% 11.54/2.25  | ALPHA: (18) implies:
% 11.54/2.25  |   (19)  grain(all_25_0)
% 11.54/2.25  |   (20)  $i(all_25_0)
% 11.54/2.25  | 
% 11.54/2.25  | DELTA: instantiating (pel47_5_2) with fresh symbol all_27_0 gives:
% 11.54/2.25  |   (21)  $i(all_27_0) & snail(all_27_0)
% 11.54/2.25  | 
% 11.54/2.25  | ALPHA: (21) implies:
% 11.54/2.25  |   (22)  snail(all_27_0)
% 11.54/2.25  |   (23)  $i(all_27_0)
% 11.54/2.25  | 
% 11.54/2.25  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (pel47_1_1) with all_21_0, simplifying with (13),
% 11.54/2.25  |              (14) gives:
% 11.54/2.25  |   (24)  animal(all_21_0)
% 11.54/2.25  | 
% 11.54/2.25  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (pel47_10) with all_17_0, all_21_0, simplifying
% 11.54/2.25  |              with (7), (8), (13), (14) gives:
% 11.54/2.25  |   (25)  much_smaller(all_17_0, all_21_0)
% 11.54/2.25  | 
% 11.54/2.25  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (pel47_2_1) with all_17_0, simplifying with (7),
% 11.54/2.25  |              (8) gives:
% 11.54/2.25  |   (26)  animal(all_17_0)
% 11.54/2.25  | 
% 11.54/2.25  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (pel47_9) with all_19_0, all_17_0, simplifying with
% 11.54/2.25  |              (7), (8), (10), (11) gives:
% 11.54/2.25  |   (27)  much_smaller(all_19_0, all_17_0)
% 11.54/2.25  | 
% 11.54/2.25  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (pel47_3_1) with all_19_0, simplifying with (10),
% 11.54/2.25  |              (11) gives:
% 11.54/2.25  |   (28)  animal(all_19_0)
% 11.54/2.25  | 
% 11.54/2.25  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_23_0, simplifying with (16), (17)
% 11.54/2.25  |              gives:
% 11.54/2.25  |   (29)   ? [v0: $i] : ($i(v0) & eats(all_23_0, v0) & plant(v0))
% 11.54/2.25  | 
% 11.54/2.25  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_27_0, all_19_0, simplifying with (10),
% 11.54/2.25  |              (11), (22), (23) gives:
% 11.54/2.25  |   (30)  much_smaller(all_27_0, all_19_0)
% 11.54/2.25  | 
% 11.54/2.25  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (pel47_5_1) with all_27_0, simplifying with (22),
% 11.54/2.25  |              (23) gives:
% 11.54/2.25  |   (31)  animal(all_27_0)
% 11.54/2.25  | 
% 11.54/2.25  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_27_0, simplifying with (22), (23)
% 11.54/2.25  |              gives:
% 11.54/2.25  |   (32)   ? [v0: $i] : ($i(v0) & eats(all_27_0, v0) & plant(v0))
% 11.54/2.25  | 
% 11.54/2.25  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (pel47_6_2) with all_25_0, simplifying with (19),
% 11.54/2.25  |              (20) gives:
% 11.54/2.25  |   (33)  plant(all_25_0)
% 11.54/2.25  | 
% 11.54/2.25  | DELTA: instantiating (32) with fresh symbol all_35_0 gives:
% 11.54/2.25  |   (34)  $i(all_35_0) & eats(all_27_0, all_35_0) & plant(all_35_0)
% 11.54/2.25  | 
% 11.54/2.25  | ALPHA: (34) implies:
% 11.54/2.25  |   (35)  plant(all_35_0)
% 11.54/2.25  |   (36)  eats(all_27_0, all_35_0)
% 11.54/2.25  |   (37)  $i(all_35_0)
% 11.54/2.25  | 
% 11.54/2.25  | DELTA: instantiating (29) with fresh symbol all_37_0 gives:
% 11.54/2.25  |   (38)  $i(all_37_0) & eats(all_23_0, all_37_0) & plant(all_37_0)
% 11.54/2.25  | 
% 11.54/2.25  | ALPHA: (38) implies:
% 11.54/2.25  |   (39)  plant(all_37_0)
% 11.54/2.25  |   (40)  $i(all_37_0)
% 11.54/2.25  | 
% 11.54/2.25  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (pel47_7) with all_19_0, all_27_0, all_35_0,
% 11.54/2.25  |              all_37_0, simplifying with (11), (23), (28), (30), (31), (35),
% 11.54/2.25  |              (36), (37), (39), (40) gives:
% 11.54/2.25  |   (41)  eats(all_19_0, all_37_0) | eats(all_19_0, all_27_0)
% 11.54/2.25  | 
% 11.54/2.26  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (pel47_7) with all_19_0, all_27_0, all_35_0,
% 11.54/2.26  |              all_25_0, simplifying with (11), (20), (23), (28), (30), (31),
% 11.54/2.26  |              (33), (35), (36), (37) gives:
% 11.54/2.26  |   (42)  eats(all_19_0, all_27_0) | eats(all_19_0, all_25_0)
% 11.54/2.26  | 
% 11.54/2.26  | BETA: splitting (42) gives:
% 11.54/2.26  | 
% 11.54/2.26  | Case 1:
% 11.54/2.26  | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | |   (43)  eats(all_19_0, all_27_0)
% 11.54/2.26  | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (pel47_13) with all_19_0, all_27_0, simplifying
% 11.54/2.26  | |              with (10), (11), (22), (23), (43) gives:
% 11.54/2.26  | |   (44)  $false
% 11.54/2.26  | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | CLOSE: (44) is inconsistent.
% 11.54/2.26  | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | Case 2:
% 11.54/2.26  | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | |   (45)  eats(all_19_0, all_25_0)
% 11.54/2.26  | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | BETA: splitting (41) gives:
% 11.54/2.26  | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | Case 1:
% 11.54/2.26  | | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | |   (46)  eats(all_19_0, all_37_0)
% 11.54/2.26  | | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (pel47_7) with all_17_0, all_19_0, all_37_0,
% 11.54/2.26  | | |              all_37_0, simplifying with (8), (11), (26), (27), (28), (39),
% 11.54/2.26  | | |              (40), (46) gives:
% 11.54/2.26  | | |   (47)  eats(all_17_0, all_37_0) | eats(all_17_0, all_19_0)
% 11.54/2.26  | | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | | BETA: splitting (47) gives:
% 11.54/2.26  | | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | | Case 1:
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | | |   (48)  eats(all_17_0, all_37_0)
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (pel47_7) with all_21_0, all_17_0, all_37_0,
% 11.54/2.26  | | | |              all_25_0, simplifying with (8), (14), (20), (24), (25),
% 11.54/2.26  | | | |              (26), (33), (39), (40), (48) gives:
% 11.54/2.26  | | | |   (49)  eats(all_21_0, all_25_0) | eats(all_21_0, all_17_0)
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | BETA: splitting (49) gives:
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | Case 1:
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | |   (50)  eats(all_21_0, all_25_0)
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_21_0, all_25_0, simplifying
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | |              with (13), (14), (19), (20), (50) gives:
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | |   (51)  $false
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | | CLOSE: (51) is inconsistent.
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | Case 2:
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | |   (52)  eats(all_21_0, all_17_0)
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_21_0, all_17_0, simplifying
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | |              with (7), (8), (13), (14), (52) gives:
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | |   (53)  $false
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | | CLOSE: (53) is inconsistent.
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | End of split
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | | Case 2:
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | | |   (54)  eats(all_17_0, all_19_0)
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (pel47) with all_17_0, all_19_0, all_25_0,
% 11.54/2.26  | | | |              simplifying with (8), (11), (19), (20), (26), (28), (45),
% 11.54/2.26  | | | |              (54) gives:
% 11.54/2.26  | | | |   (55)  $false
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | CLOSE: (55) is inconsistent.
% 11.54/2.26  | | | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | | End of split
% 11.54/2.26  | | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | Case 2:
% 11.54/2.26  | | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | |   (56)  eats(all_19_0, all_27_0)
% 11.54/2.26  | | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (pel47_13) with all_19_0, all_27_0, simplifying
% 11.54/2.26  | | |              with (10), (11), (22), (23), (56) gives:
% 11.54/2.26  | | |   (57)  $false
% 11.54/2.26  | | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | | CLOSE: (57) is inconsistent.
% 11.54/2.26  | | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | | End of split
% 11.54/2.26  | | 
% 11.54/2.26  | End of split
% 11.54/2.26  | 
% 11.54/2.26  End of proof
% 11.54/2.26  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 11.54/2.27  
% 11.54/2.27  1678ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------