↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : PUZ031-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 13:42:08 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 58.58s 58.87s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 58.98s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : PUZ031-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue Jun 18 10:14:23 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.54  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 58.50/58.84  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.50/58.84  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 58.50/58.84  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 58.50/58.84  % Transform   :cnf
% 58.50/58.84  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 58.50/58.84  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 58.50/58.84  
% 58.50/58.84  % Result      :Theorem 58.010000s
% 58.50/58.84  % Output      :CNFRefutation 58.010000s
% 58.50/58.84  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.50/58.86  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.50/58.86  % File     : PUZ031-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 58.50/58.86  % Domain   : Puzzles
% 58.50/58.86  % Problem  : Schubert's Steamroller
% 58.50/58.86  % Version  : Especial.
% 58.50/58.86  % English  : Wolves, foxes, birds, caterpillars, and snails are animals, and
% 58.50/58.86  %            there are some of each of them. Also there are some grains, and
% 58.50/58.86  %            grains are plants. Every animal either likes to eat all plants
% 58.50/58.86  %            or all animals much smaller than itself that like to eat some
% 58.50/58.86  %            plants. Caterpillars and snails are much smaller than birds,
% 58.50/58.86  %            which are much smaller than foxes, which in turn are much
% 58.50/58.86  %            smaller than wolves. Wolves do not like to eat foxes or grains,
% 58.50/58.86  %            while birds like to eat caterpillars but not snails.
% 58.50/58.86  %            Caterpillars and snails like to eat some plants. Therefore
% 58.50/58.86  %            there is an animal that likes to eat a grain eating animal.
% 58.50/58.86  
% 58.50/58.86  % Refs     : [Sti86] Stickel (1986), Schubert's Steamroller Problem: Formul
% 58.50/58.86  %          : [Pel86] Pelletier (1986), Seventy-five Problems for Testing Au
% 58.50/58.86  %          : [WB87]  Wang & Bledsoe (1987), Hierarchical Deduction
% 58.50/58.86  %          : [MB88]  Manthey & Bry (1988), SATCHMO: A Theorem Prover Implem
% 58.50/58.86  % Source   : [Pel86]
% 58.50/58.86  % Names    : Pelletier 47 [Pel86]
% 58.50/58.86  %          : steamroller.ver1.in [ANL]
% 58.50/58.86  %          : steam.in [OTTER]
% 58.50/58.86  %          : SST [WB87]
% 58.50/58.86  
% 58.50/58.86  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 58.50/58.86  % Rating   : 0.00 v7.1.0, 0.17 v7.0.0, 0.12 v6.3.0, 0.14 v6.2.0, 0.00 v2.2.1, 0.25 v2.1.0, 0.00 v2.0.0
% 58.50/58.86  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   26 (   6 unt;   1 nHn;  26 RR)
% 58.50/58.86  %            Number of literals    :   63 (   0 equ;  40 neg)
% 58.50/58.86  %            Maximal clause size   :    8 (   2 avg)
% 58.50/58.86  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 58.50/58.86  %            Number of predicates  :   10 (  10 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 58.50/58.86  %            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-1 aty)
% 58.50/58.86  %            Number of variables   :   33 (   0 sgn)
% 58.50/58.86  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN
% 58.50/58.86  
% 58.50/58.86  % Comments : This problem is named after Len Schubert.
% 58.50/58.86  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.50/58.86  cnf(wolf_is_an_animal,axiom,
% 58.50/58.86      ( animal(X)
% 58.50/58.86      | ~ wolf(X) ) ).
% 58.50/58.86  
% 58.50/58.86  cnf(fox_is_an_animal,axiom,
% 58.50/58.86      ( animal(X)
% 58.50/58.86      | ~ fox(X) ) ).
% 58.50/58.86  
% 58.50/58.86  cnf(bird_is_an_animal,axiom,
% 58.50/58.86      ( animal(X)
% 58.50/58.86      | ~ bird(X) ) ).
% 58.50/58.86  
% 58.50/58.86  cnf(caterpillar_is_an_animal,axiom,
% 58.50/58.86      ( animal(X)
% 58.50/58.86      | ~ caterpillar(X) ) ).
% 58.50/58.86  
% 58.50/58.86  cnf(snail_is_an_animal,axiom,
% 58.50/58.86      ( animal(X)
% 58.50/58.86      | ~ snail(X) ) ).
% 58.50/58.86  
% 58.50/58.86  cnf(there_is_a_wolf,axiom,
% 58.50/58.86      wolf(a_wolf) ).
% 58.50/58.87  
% 58.50/58.87  cnf(there_is_a_fox,axiom,
% 58.50/58.87      fox(a_fox) ).
% 58.50/58.87  
% 58.50/58.87  cnf(there_is_a_bird,axiom,
% 58.50/58.87      bird(a_bird) ).
% 58.50/58.87  
% 58.50/58.87  cnf(there_is_a_caterpillar,axiom,
% 58.50/58.87      caterpillar(a_caterpillar) ).
% 58.50/58.87  
% 58.50/58.87  cnf(there_is_a_snail,axiom,
% 58.50/58.87      snail(a_snail) ).
% 58.50/58.87  
% 58.50/58.87  cnf(there_is_a_grain,axiom,
% 58.50/58.87      grain(a_grain) ).
% 58.50/58.87  
% 58.50/58.87  cnf(grain_is_a_plant,axiom,
% 58.50/58.87      ( plant(X)
% 58.50/58.87      | ~ grain(X) ) ).
% 58.50/58.87  
% 58.50/58.87  cnf(eating_habits,axiom,
% 58.50/58.87      ( eats(Animal,Plant)
% 58.50/58.87      | eats(Animal,Small_animal)
% 58.50/58.87      | ~ animal(Animal)
% 58.50/58.87      | ~ plant(Plant)
% 58.50/58.87      | ~ animal(Small_animal)
% 58.50/58.87      | ~ plant(Other_plant)
% 58.50/58.87      | ~ much_smaller(Small_animal,Animal)
% 58.50/58.87      | ~ eats(Small_animal,Other_plant) ) ).
% 58.50/58.87  
% 58.50/58.87  cnf(caterpillar_smaller_than_bird,axiom,
% 58.50/58.87      ( much_smaller(Catapillar,Bird)
% 58.50/58.87      | ~ caterpillar(Catapillar)
% 58.50/58.87      | ~ bird(Bird) ) ).
% 58.50/58.87  
% 58.50/58.87  cnf(snail_smaller_than_bird,axiom,
% 58.58/58.87      ( much_smaller(Snail,Bird)
% 58.58/58.87      | ~ snail(Snail)
% 58.58/58.87      | ~ bird(Bird) ) ).
% 58.58/58.87  
% 58.58/58.87  cnf(bird_smaller_than_fox,axiom,
% 58.58/58.87      ( much_smaller(Bird,Fox)
% 58.58/58.87      | ~ bird(Bird)
% 58.58/58.87      | ~ fox(Fox) ) ).
% 58.58/58.87  
% 58.58/58.87  cnf(fox_smaller_than_wolf,axiom,
% 58.58/58.87      ( much_smaller(Fox,Wolf)
% 58.58/58.87      | ~ fox(Fox)
% 58.58/58.87      | ~ wolf(Wolf) ) ).
% 58.58/58.87  
% 58.58/58.87  cnf(wolf_dont_eat_fox,axiom,
% 58.58/58.87      ( ~ wolf(Wolf)
% 58.58/58.87      | ~ fox(Fox)
% 58.58/58.87      | ~ eats(Wolf,Fox) ) ).
% 58.58/58.87  
% 58.58/58.87  cnf(wolf_dont_eat_grain,axiom,
% 58.58/58.87      ( ~ wolf(Wolf)
% 58.58/58.87      | ~ grain(Grain)
% 58.58/58.87      | ~ eats(Wolf,Grain) ) ).
% 58.58/58.87  
% 58.58/58.87  cnf(bird_eats_caterpillar,axiom,
% 58.58/58.87      ( eats(Bird,Catapillar)
% 58.58/58.87      | ~ bird(Bird)
% 58.58/58.87      | ~ caterpillar(Catapillar) ) ).
% 58.58/58.87  
% 58.58/58.87  cnf(bird_dont_eat_snail,axiom,
% 58.58/58.87      ( ~ bird(Bird)
% 58.58/58.87      | ~ snail(Snail)
% 58.58/58.87      | ~ eats(Bird,Snail) ) ).
% 58.58/58.87  
% 58.58/58.87  cnf(caterpillar_food_is_a_plant,axiom,
% 58.58/58.87      ( plant(caterpillar_food_of(Catapillar))
% 58.58/58.87      | ~ caterpillar(Catapillar) ) ).
% 58.58/58.87  
% 58.58/58.87  cnf(caterpillar_eats_caterpillar_food,axiom,
% 58.58/58.87      ( eats(Catapillar,caterpillar_food_of(Catapillar))
% 58.58/58.87      | ~ caterpillar(Catapillar) ) ).
% 58.58/58.87  
% 58.58/58.87  cnf(snail_food_is_a_plant,axiom,
% 58.58/58.87      ( plant(snail_food_of(Snail))
% 58.58/58.87      | ~ snail(Snail) ) ).
% 58.58/58.87  
% 58.58/58.87  cnf(snail_eats_snail_food,axiom,
% 58.58/58.87      ( eats(Snail,snail_food_of(Snail))
% 58.58/58.87      | ~ snail(Snail) ) ).
% 58.58/58.87  
% 58.58/58.87  cnf(prove_the_animal_exists,negated_conjecture,
% 58.58/58.87      ( ~ animal(Animal)
% 58.58/58.87      | ~ animal(Grain_eater)
% 58.58/58.87      | ~ grain(Grain)
% 58.58/58.87      | ~ eats(Animal,Grain_eater)
% 58.58/58.87      | ~ eats(Grain_eater,Grain) ) ).
% 58.58/58.87  
% 58.58/58.87  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.58/58.87  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.58/58.87  % Proof found
% 58.58/58.87  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 58.58/58.87  % SZS output start Proof
% 58.58/58.88  %ClaNum:26(EqnAxiom:0)
% 58.58/58.88  %VarNum:73(SingletonVarNum:33)
% 58.58/58.88  %MaxLitNum:8
% 58.58/58.88  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 58.58/58.88  %SharedTerms:12
% 58.58/58.88  %goalClause: 25
% 58.58/58.88  [1]P1(a1)
% 58.58/58.88  [2]P2(a2)
% 58.58/58.88  [3]P3(a3)
% 58.58/58.88  [4]P5(a4)
% 58.58/58.88  [5]P7(a5)
% 58.58/58.88  [6]P8(a6)
% 58.58/58.88  [7]~P1(x71)+P4(x71)
% 58.58/58.88  [8]~P2(x81)+P4(x81)
% 58.58/58.88  [9]~P3(x91)+P4(x91)
% 58.58/58.88  [10]~P5(x101)+P4(x101)
% 58.58/58.88  [11]~P7(x111)+P4(x111)
% 58.58/58.88  [12]~P8(x121)+P9(x121)
% 58.58/58.88  [13]~P5(x131)+P9(f7(x131))
% 58.58/58.88  [14]~P7(x141)+P9(f8(x141))
% 58.58/58.88  [15]~P5(x151)+P6(x151,f7(x151))
% 58.58/58.88  [16]~P7(x161)+P6(x161,f8(x161))
% 58.58/58.88  [17]~P3(x171)+~P5(x172)+P6(x171,x172)
% 58.58/58.88  [18]~P1(x182)+~P2(x181)+P10(x181,x182)
% 58.58/58.88  [19]~P2(x192)+~P3(x191)+P10(x191,x192)
% 58.58/58.88  [20]~P3(x202)+~P5(x201)+P10(x201,x202)
% 58.58/58.88  [21]~P3(x212)+~P7(x211)+P10(x211,x212)
% 58.58/58.88  [22]~P6(x221,x222)+~P1(x221)+~P2(x222)
% 58.58/58.88  [23]~P6(x231,x232)+~P1(x231)+~P8(x232)
% 58.58/58.88  [24]~P6(x241,x242)+~P3(x241)+~P7(x242)
% 58.58/58.88  [25]~P6(x251,x253)+~P6(x252,x251)+~P4(x251)+~P4(x252)+~P8(x253)
% 58.58/58.88  [26]~P4(x262)+~P4(x261)+~P9(x263)+~P6(x262,x264)+~P10(x262,x261)+P6(x261,x262)+P6(x261,x263)+~P9(x264)
% 58.58/58.88  %EqnAxiom
% 58.58/58.88  
% 58.58/58.88  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.74/59.06  cnf(27,plain,
% 58.74/59.06     (~P6(a1,a2)),
% 58.74/59.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,22])).
% 58.74/59.06  cnf(29,plain,
% 58.74/59.06     (~P6(a1,a6)),
% 58.74/59.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,6,22,23])).
% 58.74/59.06  cnf(31,plain,
% 58.74/59.06     (~P6(a3,a5)),
% 58.74/59.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,3,5,6,22,23,24])).
% 58.74/59.06  cnf(375727,plain,
% 58.74/59.07     (P4(a1)),
% 58.74/59.07     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,7])).
% 58.74/59.07  cnf(375729,plain,
% 58.74/59.07     (P4(a2)),
% 58.74/59.07     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,7,8])).
% 58.74/59.07  cnf(375731,plain,
% 58.74/59.07     (P4(a3)),
% 58.74/59.07     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,3,7,8,9])).
% 58.74/59.07  cnf(375733,plain,
% 58.74/59.07     (P4(a4)),
% 58.74/59.07     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,3,4,7,8,9,10])).
% 58.74/59.07  cnf(375735,plain,
% 58.74/59.07     (P4(a5)),
% 58.74/59.07     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,5,3,4,7,8,9,10,11])).
% 58.74/59.07  cnf(375737,plain,
% 58.74/59.07     (P9(a6)),
% 58.74/59.07     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,5,6,3,4,7,8,9,10,11,12])).
% 58.74/59.07  cnf(375739,plain,
% 58.74/59.07     (P9(f7(a4))),
% 58.74/59.07     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,5,6,3,4,7,8,9,10,11,12,13])).
% 58.74/59.07  cnf(375741,plain,
% 58.74/59.07     (P9(f8(a5))),
% 58.74/59.07     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,5,6,3,4,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14])).
% 58.74/59.07  cnf(375743,plain,
% 58.74/59.07     (P6(a4,f7(a4))),
% 58.74/59.07     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,5,6,3,4,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15])).
% 58.74/59.07  cnf(375745,plain,
% 58.74/59.07     (P6(a5,f8(a5))),
% 58.74/59.07     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,5,6,3,4,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16])).
% 58.74/59.07  cnf(375747,plain,
% 58.74/59.07     (P10(a2,a1)),
% 58.74/59.07     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,5,6,3,4,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,18])).
% 58.74/59.07  cnf(375749,plain,
% 58.74/59.07     (P10(a3,a2)),
% 58.74/59.07     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,5,6,3,4,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,18,19])).
% 58.74/59.07  cnf(375753,plain,
% 58.74/59.07     (P10(a5,a3)),
% 58.74/59.07     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,5,6,3,4,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,18,19,20,21])).
% 58.74/59.07  cnf(375755,plain,
% 58.74/59.07     (P6(a3,a4)),
% 58.74/59.07     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,5,6,3,4,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,18,19,20,21,17])).
% 58.74/59.07  cnf(375770,plain,
% 58.74/59.07     (~P6(a2,a6)),
% 58.74/59.07     inference(scs_inference,[],[375747,375729,375755,375727,375733,375737,375743,375731,27,29,25,26])).
% 58.74/59.07  cnf(375791,plain,
% 58.74/59.07     (P6(a3,f7(a4))),
% 58.74/59.07     inference(scs_inference,[],[375753,375739,375741,375745,375735,375731,31,26])).
% 58.74/59.07  cnf(375799,plain,
% 58.74/59.07     (~P6(a3,a6)),
% 58.74/59.07     inference(scs_inference,[],[375749,375791,375770,375739,375731,375729,375737,6,26,25])).
% 58.74/59.07  cnf(375801,plain,
% 58.74/59.07     ($false),
% 58.74/59.07     inference(scs_inference,[],[375799,375753,375741,375745,375735,375737,375731,31,26]),
% 58.74/59.07     ['proof']).
% 58.98/59.24  % SZS output end Proof
% 58.98/59.24  % Total time :58.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------