↑ Up

E---3.5.1.SAT-Sat.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : PUZ031_10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:01:37 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.12s 0.44s
% Output   : Saturation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_11ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_23ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tcf(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X1: animal,X2: plant,X3: animal,X4: plant] :
      ( ~ eats(X3,plant_to_edible(X4))
      | ~ much_smaller(X3,X1)
      | eats(X1,animal_to_edible(X3))
      | eats(X1,plant_to_edible(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X5: snail] : eats(snail_to_animal(X5),plant_to_edible(esk2_1(X5))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X5: snail,X2: plant,X1: animal] :
      ( ~ much_smaller(snail_to_animal(X5),X1)
      | eats(X1,plant_to_edible(X2))
      | eats(X1,animal_to_edible(snail_to_animal(X5))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X5: snail,X6: bird] : much_smaller(snail_to_animal(X5),bird_to_animal(X6)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X6: bird,X5: snail] : ~ eats(bird_to_animal(X6),animal_to_edible(snail_to_animal(X5))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X6: bird,X2: plant] : eats(bird_to_animal(X6),plant_to_edible(X2)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X6: bird,X2: plant,X1: animal] :
      ( ~ much_smaller(bird_to_animal(X6),X1)
      | eats(X1,plant_to_edible(X2))
      | eats(X1,animal_to_edible(bird_to_animal(X6))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_21]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X6: bird,X10: fox] : much_smaller(bird_to_animal(X6),fox_to_animal(X10)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_33,plain,
    ! [X10: fox,X12: wolf] : much_smaller(fox_to_animal(X10),wolf_to_animal(X12)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_34,plain,
    ! [X12: wolf,X10: fox] : ~ eats(wolf_to_animal(X12),animal_to_edible(fox_to_animal(X10))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_35,plain,
    ! [X7: caterpillar] : eats(caterpillar_to_animal(X7),plant_to_edible(esk1_1(X7))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_36,plain,
    ! [X12: wolf,X16: grain] : ~ eats(wolf_to_animal(X12),plant_to_edible(grain_to_plant(X16))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_40,plain,
    ! [X7: caterpillar,X2: plant,X1: animal] :
      ( ~ much_smaller(caterpillar_to_animal(X7),X1)
      | eats(X1,plant_to_edible(X2))
      | eats(X1,animal_to_edible(caterpillar_to_animal(X7))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_35]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_41,plain,
    ! [X10: fox,X6: bird] : eats(fox_to_animal(X10),animal_to_edible(bird_to_animal(X6))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_42,plain,
    ! [X6: bird,X7: caterpillar] : eats(bird_to_animal(X6),animal_to_edible(caterpillar_to_animal(X7))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_38]),
    [final] ).

tcf(c_0_43,plain,
    ! [X7: caterpillar,X6: bird] : much_smaller(caterpillar_to_animal(X7),bird_to_animal(X6)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]),
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : PUZ031_10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 03:45:35 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.44  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 4072322 completed with status 1
% 0.12/0.44  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.44  % Search class: FGUNM-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.44  % partial match(1): FGUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44  % Starting SAT001_CA_MinMin_p005000_rr with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44  % SubtermCWHack with pid 4072331 completed with status 1
% 0.12/0.44  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.12/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.44  % Search class: FGUNM-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.44  % partial match(1): FGUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.44  
% 0.12/0.44  % No proof found!
% 0.12/0.44  % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.12/0.44  % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.44  % Parsed axioms                        : 30
% 0.12/0.44  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Initial clauses                      : 30
% 0.12/0.44  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 19
% 0.12/0.44  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 11
% 0.12/0.44  % Processed clauses                    : 19
% 0.12/0.44  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % ...remaining for further processing  : 19
% 0.12/0.44  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.12/0.44  % Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.12/0.44  % Generated clauses                    : 10
% 0.12/0.44  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 9
% 0.12/0.44  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Paramodulations                      : 10
% 0.12/0.44  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Total rewrite steps                  : 3
% 0.12/0.44  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.12/0.44  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.12/0.44  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.44  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.12/0.44  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.44  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.12/0.44  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.12/0.44  % Current number of processed clauses  : 16
% 0.12/0.44  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 9
% 0.12/0.44  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.44  %    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.12/0.44  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 4
% 0.12/0.44  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.44  % ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Current number of archived clauses   : 3
% 0.12/0.44  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6
% 0.12/0.44  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.12/0.44  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.12/0.44  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.12/0.44  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.12/0.44  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.12/0.44  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1165
% 0.12/0.44  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 55
% 0.12/0.44  
% 0.12/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.44  % User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.12/0.44  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.12/0.44  % Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.12/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 3668 pages
% 0.12/0.44  
% 0.12/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.44  % User time                : 0.017 s
% 0.12/0.44  % System time              : 0.015 s
% 0.12/0.44  % Total time               : 0.032 s
% 0.12/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.12/0.44  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------