%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : PUZ032-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NR2HE4nWwS true
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:49:32 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.46s 0.70s
% Output : Refutation 0.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10 % Problem : PUZ032-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.05/0.10 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NR2HE4nWwS true
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 15:07:38 EDT 2025
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.31 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.10/0.31 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.31 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.10/0.31 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.15/0.31 % Running in FO mode
% 0.44/0.55 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.44/0.55 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.44/0.55 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.45/0.66 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.45/0.66 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.45/0.66 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.45/0.66 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.45/0.67 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.45/0.67 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.45/0.67 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.46/0.70 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.46/0.70 % BCE start: 10
% 0.46/0.70 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.46/0.70 % PE start: 10
% 0.46/0.70 logic: neq
% 0.46/0.70 % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.46/0.70 % done 21 iterations in 0.015s
% 0.46/0.70 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.46/0.70 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.46/0.70 thf(says_type, type, says: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(a_truth_type, type, a_truth: $i > $o).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(truthteller_type, type, truthteller: $i > $i).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(liar_type, type, liar: $i > $i).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(b_says_a_says_hes_a_liar, axiom,
% 0.46/0.70 (a_truth @ ( says @ b @ ( says @ a @ ( liar @ a ) ) ))).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 0.46/0.70 ( (a_truth @ (says @ b @ (says @ a @ (liar @ a))))),
% 0.46/0.70 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [b_says_a_says_hes_a_liar])).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(liars_are_told_by_liars, axiom,
% 0.46/0.70 (( a_truth @ Statement ) |
% 0.46/0.70 ( ~( a_truth @ ( says @ Liar @ Statement ) ) ) |
% 0.46/0.70 ( a_truth @ ( liar @ Liar ) ))).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.46/0.70 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.46/0.70 ( (a_truth @ X0)
% 0.46/0.70 | ~ (a_truth @ (says @ X1 @ X0))
% 0.46/0.70 | (a_truth @ (liar @ X1)))),
% 0.46/0.70 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [liars_are_told_by_liars])).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(zip_derived_cl19, plain,
% 0.46/0.70 (( (a_truth @ (says @ a @ (liar @ a))) | (a_truth @ (liar @ b)))),
% 0.46/0.70 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl7, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(c_says_b_is_a_liar, axiom, (a_truth @ ( says @ c @ ( liar @ b ) ))).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain, ( (a_truth @ (says @ c @ (liar @ b)))),
% 0.46/0.70 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [c_says_b_is_a_liar])).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(truths_are_told_by_truthtellers, axiom,
% 0.46/0.70 (( ~( a_truth @ Statement ) ) |
% 0.46/0.70 ( ~( a_truth @ ( says @ Truthteller @ Statement ) ) ) |
% 0.46/0.70 ( a_truth @ ( truthteller @ Truthteller ) ))).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.46/0.70 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.46/0.70 (~ (a_truth @ X0)
% 0.46/0.70 | ~ (a_truth @ (says @ X1 @ X0))
% 0.46/0.70 | (a_truth @ (truthteller @ X1)))),
% 0.46/0.70 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [truths_are_told_by_truthtellers])).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain,
% 0.46/0.70 ((~ (a_truth @ (liar @ b)) | (a_truth @ (truthteller @ c)))),
% 0.46/0.70 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(prove_c_is_a_truthteller, conjecture, (a_truth @ ( truthteller @ c ))).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( a_truth @ ( truthteller @ c ) )),
% 0.46/0.70 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_c_is_a_truthteller])).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain, (~ (a_truth @ (truthteller @ c))),
% 0.46/0.70 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain, (~ (a_truth @ (liar @ b))),
% 0.46/0.70 inference('clc', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl15, zip_derived_cl9])).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(zip_derived_cl21, plain, ( (a_truth @ (says @ a @ (liar @ a)))),
% 0.46/0.70 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl19, zip_derived_cl17])).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.46/0.70 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.46/0.70 (~ (a_truth @ X0)
% 0.46/0.70 | ~ (a_truth @ (says @ X1 @ X0))
% 0.46/0.70 | (a_truth @ (truthteller @ X1)))),
% 0.46/0.70 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [truths_are_told_by_truthtellers])).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(zip_derived_cl25, plain,
% 0.46/0.70 ((~ (a_truth @ (liar @ a)) | (a_truth @ (truthteller @ a)))),
% 0.46/0.70 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl21, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(zip_derived_cl21, plain, ( (a_truth @ (says @ a @ (liar @ a)))),
% 0.46/0.70 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl19, zip_derived_cl17])).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.46/0.70 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.46/0.70 ( (a_truth @ X0)
% 0.46/0.70 | ~ (a_truth @ (says @ X1 @ X0))
% 0.46/0.70 | (a_truth @ (liar @ X1)))),
% 0.46/0.70 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [liars_are_told_by_liars])).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(zip_derived_cl26, plain,
% 0.46/0.70 (( (a_truth @ (liar @ a)) | (a_truth @ (liar @ a)))),
% 0.46/0.70 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl21, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(zip_derived_cl27, plain, ( (a_truth @ (liar @ a))),
% 0.46/0.70 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl26])).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(zip_derived_cl32, plain, ( (a_truth @ (truthteller @ a))),
% 0.46/0.70 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl25, zip_derived_cl27])).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(not_both, axiom,
% 0.46/0.70 (( ~( a_truth @ ( truthteller @ X ) ) ) | ( ~( a_truth @ ( liar @ X ) ) ))).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.46/0.70 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.46/0.70 (~ (a_truth @ (truthteller @ X0)) | ~ (a_truth @ (liar @ X0)))),
% 0.46/0.70 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [not_both])).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(zip_derived_cl33, plain, (~ (a_truth @ (liar @ a))),
% 0.46/0.70 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl32, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(zip_derived_cl27, plain, ( (a_truth @ (liar @ a))),
% 0.46/0.70 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl26])).
% 0.46/0.70 thf(zip_derived_cl35, plain, ($false),
% 0.46/0.70 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl33, zip_derived_cl27])).
% 0.46/0.70
% 0.46/0.70 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.46/0.70
% 0.46/0.70
% 0.46/0.70 % Terminating...
% 1.56/0.77 % Runner terminated.
% 1.56/0.78 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------