↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : PUZ033-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 13:42:09 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.48s 0.59s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : PUZ033-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.11/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Jun 18 10:28:54 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.56  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.48/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.59  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.48/0.59  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.48/0.59  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.48/0.59  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.48/0.59  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.48/0.59  
% 0.48/0.59  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.48/0.59  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.48/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.59  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.59  % File     : PUZ033-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.48/0.59  % Domain   : Puzzles
% 0.48/0.59  % Problem  : The Winds and the Windows Puzzle
% 0.48/0.59  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.48/0.59  % English  : (1) There is always sunshine when the wind is in the East.
% 0.48/0.59  %            (2) When it is cold and foggy, my neighbor practices the flute.
% 0.48/0.59  %            (3) When my fire smokes, I set the door open.
% 0.48/0.59  %            (4) When it is cold and I feel rheumatic, I light my fire.
% 0.48/0.59  %            (5) When the wind is in the East and comes in gusts, my fire
% 0.48/0.59  %                smokes.
% 0.48/0.59  %            (6) When I keep the door open, I am free from headache.
% 0.48/0.59  %            (7) Even when the sun is shining and it is not cold, I keep my
% 0.48/0.59  %                window shut if it is foggy.
% 0.48/0.59  %            (8) When the wind does not come in gusts, and when I have a
% 0.48/0.59  %                fire and keep the door shut, I do not feel rheumatic.
% 0.48/0.59  %            (9) Sunshine always brings on fog.
% 0.48/0.59  %            (10) When my neighbor practices the flute, I shut the door,
% 0.48/0.59  %                even if I have no headache.
% 0.48/0.59  %            (11) When there is a fog and the wind is in the East, I feel
% 0.48/0.59  %                rheumatic.
% 0.48/0.59  %            Show that when the wind is in the East, I keep my windows shut.
% 0.48/0.59  
% 0.48/0.59  % Refs     : [Car86] Carroll (1986), Lewis Carroll's Symbolic Logic
% 0.48/0.59  % Source   : [ANL]
% 0.48/0.59  % Names    : winds.ver1.in [ANL]
% 0.48/0.59  
% 0.48/0.59  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.48/0.59  % Rating   : 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.48/0.59  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   13 (   2 unt;   2 nHn;  13 RR)
% 0.48/0.59  %            Number of literals    :   32 (   0 equ;  20 neg)
% 0.48/0.59  %            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
% 0.48/0.59  %            Maximal term depth    :    0 (   0 avg)
% 0.48/0.59  %            Number of predicates  :   12 (  12 usr;  12 prp; 0-0 aty)
% 0.48/0.59  %            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 0.48/0.59  %            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)
% 0.48/0.59  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_PRP
% 0.48/0.59  
% 0.48/0.59  % Comments :
% 0.48/0.59  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.59  cnf(c1,axiom,
% 0.48/0.59      ( ~ wind_in_east
% 0.48/0.59      | sunshine ) ).
% 0.48/0.59  
% 0.48/0.59  cnf(c2,axiom,
% 0.48/0.59      ( ~ cold
% 0.48/0.59      | ~ foggy
% 0.48/0.59      | neighbor_practices_flute ) ).
% 0.48/0.59  
% 0.48/0.59  cnf(c3,axiom,
% 0.48/0.59      ( ~ fire_smokes
% 0.48/0.59      | door_is_open ) ).
% 0.48/0.59  
% 0.48/0.59  cnf(c4,axiom,
% 0.48/0.59      ( ~ cold
% 0.48/0.59      | ~ i_feel_rheumatic
% 0.48/0.59      | fire_is_lit ) ).
% 0.48/0.59  
% 0.48/0.59  cnf(c5,axiom,
% 0.48/0.59      ( ~ wind_in_east
% 0.48/0.59      | ~ wind_in_gusts
% 0.48/0.59      | fire_smokes ) ).
% 0.48/0.59  
% 0.48/0.59  cnf(c6,axiom,
% 0.48/0.59      ( ~ door_is_open
% 0.48/0.59      | ~ headache ) ).
% 0.48/0.59  
% 0.48/0.59  cnf(c7,axiom,
% 0.48/0.59      ( ~ sunshine
% 0.48/0.59      | cold
% 0.48/0.59      | ~ foggy
% 0.48/0.59      | window_is_shut ) ).
% 0.48/0.59  
% 0.48/0.59  cnf(c8,axiom,
% 0.48/0.59      ( wind_in_gusts
% 0.48/0.59      | ~ fire_is_lit
% 0.48/0.59      | door_is_open
% 0.48/0.59      | ~ i_feel_rheumatic ) ).
% 0.48/0.59  
% 0.48/0.59  cnf(c9,axiom,
% 0.48/0.59      ( ~ sunshine
% 0.48/0.59      | foggy ) ).
% 0.48/0.59  
% 0.48/0.59  cnf(c10,axiom,
% 0.48/0.59      ( ~ neighbor_practices_flute
% 0.48/0.59      | ~ door_is_open ) ).
% 0.48/0.59  
% 0.48/0.59  cnf(c11,axiom,
% 0.48/0.59      ( ~ foggy
% 0.48/0.59      | ~ wind_in_east
% 0.48/0.59      | i_feel_rheumatic ) ).
% 0.48/0.59  
% 0.48/0.59  cnf(c12,hypothesis,
% 0.48/0.59      wind_in_east ).
% 0.48/0.59  
% 0.48/0.59  cnf(prove_window_is_shut,negated_conjecture,
% 0.48/0.59      ~ window_is_shut ).
% 0.48/0.59  
% 0.48/0.59  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.59  % Proof found
% 0.48/0.59  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.48/0.59  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.48/0.60  %ClaNum:13(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.48/0.60  %VarNum:0(SingletonVarNum:0)
% 0.48/0.60  %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.48/0.60  %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.48/0.60  %SharedTerms:24
% 0.48/0.60  %goalClause: 2
% 0.48/0.60  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.48/0.60  [1]P1(a5000)
% 0.48/0.60  [2]~P11(a5000)
% 0.48/0.60  [3]P2(a5000)+~P1(a5000)
% 0.48/0.60  [4]P3(a5000)+~P2(a5000)
% 0.48/0.60  [5]P4(a5000)+~P6(a5000)
% 0.48/0.60  [6]~P8(a5000)+~P4(a5000)
% 0.48/0.60  [7]~P4(a5000)+~P9(a5000)
% 0.48/0.60  [8]P8(a5000)+~P5(a5000)+~P3(a5000)
% 0.48/0.60  [9]P6(a5000)+~P1(a5000)+~P12(a5000)
% 0.48/0.60  [10]P10(a5000)+~P1(a5000)+~P3(a5000)
% 0.48/0.60  [11]P7(a5000)+~P5(a5000)+~P10(a5000)
% 0.48/0.60  [12]P5(a5000)+P11(a5000)+~P2(a5000)+~P3(a5000)
% 0.48/0.60  [13]P4(a5000)+P12(a5000)+~P10(a5000)+~P7(a5000)
% 0.48/0.60  %EqnAxiom
% 0.48/0.60  
% 0.48/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.60  cnf(14,plain,
% 0.48/0.60     (P2(a5000)),
% 0.48/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3])).
% 0.48/0.60  cnf(15,plain,
% 0.48/0.60     (P6(a5000)+~P12(a5000)),
% 0.48/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,9])).
% 0.48/0.60  cnf(16,plain,
% 0.48/0.60     (P10(a5000)+~P3(a5000)),
% 0.48/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,10])).
% 0.48/0.60  cnf(17,plain,
% 0.48/0.60     (P5(a5000)+~P2(a5000)+~P3(a5000)),
% 0.48/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,12])).
% 0.48/0.60  cnf(18,plain,
% 0.48/0.60     (P3(a5000)),
% 0.48/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[14,4])).
% 0.48/0.60  cnf(19,plain,
% 0.48/0.60     (~P6(a5000)+~P8(a5000)),
% 0.48/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,6])).
% 0.48/0.60  cnf(20,plain,
% 0.48/0.60     (P8(a5000)+~P5(a5000)),
% 0.48/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,8])).
% 0.48/0.60  cnf(21,plain,
% 0.48/0.60     (P10(a5000)),
% 0.48/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,16])).
% 0.48/0.60  cnf(22,plain,
% 0.48/0.60     (P5(a5000)),
% 0.48/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[14,18,17])).
% 0.48/0.60  cnf(23,plain,
% 0.48/0.60     (P7(a5000)),
% 0.48/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[22,21,11])).
% 0.48/0.60  cnf(24,plain,
% 0.48/0.60     (P4(a5000)+P12(a5000)+~P7(a5000)),
% 0.48/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,13])).
% 0.48/0.60  cnf(25,plain,
% 0.48/0.60     (~P12(a5000)+~P8(a5000)),
% 0.48/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,19])).
% 0.48/0.60  cnf(26,plain,
% 0.48/0.60     (P8(a5000)),
% 0.48/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[22,20])).
% 0.48/0.60  cnf(27,plain,
% 0.48/0.60     (~P4(a5000)),
% 0.48/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[26,6])).
% 0.48/0.60  cnf(29,plain,
% 0.48/0.60     (P4(a5000)+P12(a5000)),
% 0.48/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[23,24])).
% 0.48/0.60  cnf(30,plain,
% 0.48/0.60     (~P12(a5000)),
% 0.48/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[26,25])).
% 0.48/0.60  cnf(34,plain,
% 0.48/0.60     ($false),
% 0.48/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[27,30,29]),
% 0.48/0.60     ['proof']).
% 0.53/0.60  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.53/0.60  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------