%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CARINE---0.734 % Problem : PUZ035-2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.0.0. % Transfm : add_equality % Format : carine % Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000 % Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu % Model : i686 i686 % CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz % Memory : 2018MB % OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Sun Nov 28 04:02:08 EST 2010 % Result : Unsatisfiable 3.40s % Output : Refutation 3.40s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % Command entered: % /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23909/PUZ/PUZ035-2+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000 % CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003) % Initializing tables ... done. % Parsing ................ done. % Calculating time slices ... done. % Building Lookup Tables ... done. % Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 6] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2] % Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 43] [nf = 2] [nu = 0] [ut = 2] % Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 170] [nf = 4] [nu = 0] [ut = 2] % Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 574] [nf = 9] [nu = 0] [ut = 2] % Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 1712] [nf = 52] [nu = 0] [ut = 2] % Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 4897] [nf = 118] [nu = 0] [ut = 2] % Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 13944] [nf = 298] [nu = 0] [ut = 2] % Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 38867] [nf = 1098] [nu = 0] [ut = 2] % Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 106873] [nf = 2408] [nu = 0] [ut = 2] % Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 289186] [nf = 7358] [nu = 0] [ut = 2] % Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ... % t = 1 secs [nr = 791937] [nf = 20545] [nu = 0] [ut = 2] % Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ... % +================================================+ % | | % | Congratulations!!! ........ A proof was found. | % | | % +================================================+ % Base Clauses and Unit Clauses used in proof: % ============================================ % Base Clauses: % ------------- % B0: ~response_1(x0) | ~isa_2(other_0(),x2) | ~isa_2(asked_0(),x1) % B4: ~isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | tell_the_truth_1(x0) % B11: ~tell_the_truth_1(asked_0()) | ~isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | response_1(yes_0()) % Unit Clauses: % -------------- % U0: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c1 t1 td1 b > person_1(asked_0()) % U1: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c1 t1 td1 b > person_1(other_0()) % U2: < d12 v0 dv0 f0 c2 t2 td1 > ~isa_2(asked_0(),knight_0()) % U3: < d12 v0 dv0 f0 c1 t1 td1 > ~tell_the_truth_1(asked_0()) % U4: < d12 v0 dv0 f0 c1 t1 td1 > lies_1(asked_0()) % U5: < d12 v0 dv0 f0 c2 t2 td1 > isa_2(asked_0(),knave_0()) % U6: < d12 v1 dv1 f0 c1 t2 td1 > ~isa_2(other_0(),x0) % U9: < d12 v0 dv0 f0 c1 t1 td1 > response_1(yes_0()) % U13: < d12 v0 dv0 f0 c2 t2 td1 > isa_2(other_0(),knave_0()) % --------------- Start of Proof --------------- % Derivation of unit clause U0: % person_1(asked_0()) ....... U0 % Derivation of unit clause U1: % person_1(other_0()) ....... U1 % Derivation of unit clause U2: % ~isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | tell_the_truth_1(x0) ....... B4 % ~tell_the_truth_1(asked_0()) | ~isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | response_1(yes_0()) ....... B11 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | ~isa_2(x0, knight_0()) | response_1(yes_0()) ....... R1 [B4:L1, B11:L0] % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | response_1(yes_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, R1:L1] % ~response_1(x0) | ~isa_2(other_0(),x2) | ~isa_2(asked_0(),x1) ....... B0 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | ~isa_2(other_0(), x0) | ~isa_2(asked_0(), x1) ....... R3 [R2:L1, B0:L0] % ~isa_2(other_0(), x0) | ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) ....... R4 [R3:L0, R3:L2] % ~person_1(x0) | isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | isa_2(x0,knave_0()) ....... B12 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | ~person_1(other_0()) | isa_2(other_0(), knave_0()) ....... R5 [R4:L0, B12:L1] % person_1(other_0()) ....... U1 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | isa_2(other_0(), knave_0()) ....... R6 [R5:L1, U1:L0] % ~response_1(x0) | ~isa_2(other_0(),x2) | ~isa_2(asked_0(),x1) ....... B0 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | ~response_1(x0) | ~isa_2(asked_0(), x1) ....... R7 [R6:L1, B0:L1] % ~response_1(x0) | ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) ....... R8 [R7:L0, R7:L2] % ~tell_the_truth_1(asked_0()) | ~isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | response_1(yes_0()) ....... B11 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | ~tell_the_truth_1(asked_0()) | ~isa_2(x0, knight_0()) ....... R9 [R8:L0, B11:L2] % ~tell_the_truth_1(asked_0()) | ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) ....... R10 [R9:L0, R9:L2] % ~isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | tell_the_truth_1(x0) ....... B4 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) ....... R11 [R10:L0, B4:L1] % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) ....... R12 [R11:L0, R11:L1] % Derivation of unit clause U3: % ~isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | tell_the_truth_1(x0) ....... B4 % ~tell_the_truth_1(asked_0()) | ~isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | response_1(yes_0()) ....... B11 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | ~isa_2(x0, knight_0()) | response_1(yes_0()) ....... R1 [B4:L1, B11:L0] % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | response_1(yes_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, R1:L1] % ~lies_1(asked_0()) | ~response_1(yes_0()) | ~isa_2(x0,knight_0()) ....... B9 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | ~lies_1(asked_0()) | ~isa_2(x0, knight_0()) ....... R3 [R2:L1, B9:L1] % ~lies_1(asked_0()) | ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) ....... R4 [R3:L0, R3:L2] % ~isa_2(x0,knave_0()) | lies_1(x0) ....... B5 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | ~isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) ....... R5 [R4:L0, B5:L1] % ~person_1(x0) | isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | isa_2(x0,knave_0()) ....... B12 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) | ~person_1(asked_0()) | isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) ....... R6 [R5:L0, B12:L1] % person_1(asked_0()) ....... U0 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) | isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) ....... R7 [R6:L1, U0:L0] % ~isa_2(x0,knave_0()) | lies_1(x0) ....... B5 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) | lies_1(asked_0()) ....... R8 [R7:L1, B5:L0] % ~lies_1(x0) | ~tell_the_truth_1(x0) ....... B3 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) | ~tell_the_truth_1(asked_0()) ....... R9 [R8:L1, B3:L0] % ~person_1(x0) | isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | isa_2(x0,knave_0()) ....... B12 % ~tell_the_truth_1(asked_0()) | ~person_1(asked_0()) | isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) ....... R10 [R9:L0, B12:L2] % person_1(asked_0()) ....... U0 % ~tell_the_truth_1(asked_0()) | isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) ....... R11 [R10:L1, U0:L0] % ~isa_2(asked_0(),knight_0()) ....... U2 % ~tell_the_truth_1(asked_0()) ....... R12 [R11:L1, U2:L0] % Derivation of unit clause U4: % ~isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | tell_the_truth_1(x0) ....... B4 % ~tell_the_truth_1(asked_0()) | ~isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | response_1(yes_0()) ....... B11 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | ~isa_2(x0, knight_0()) | response_1(yes_0()) ....... R1 [B4:L1, B11:L0] % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | response_1(yes_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, R1:L1] % ~lies_1(asked_0()) | ~response_1(yes_0()) | ~isa_2(x0,knight_0()) ....... B9 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | ~lies_1(asked_0()) | ~isa_2(x0, knight_0()) ....... R3 [R2:L1, B9:L1] % ~lies_1(asked_0()) | ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) ....... R4 [R3:L0, R3:L2] % ~isa_2(x0,knave_0()) | lies_1(x0) ....... B5 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | ~isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) ....... R5 [R4:L0, B5:L1] % ~person_1(x0) | isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | isa_2(x0,knave_0()) ....... B12 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) | ~person_1(asked_0()) | isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) ....... R6 [R5:L0, B12:L1] % person_1(asked_0()) ....... U0 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) | isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) ....... R7 [R6:L1, U0:L0] % ~isa_2(x0,knave_0()) | lies_1(x0) ....... B5 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) | lies_1(asked_0()) ....... R8 [R7:L1, B5:L0] % ~person_1(x0) | isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | isa_2(x0,knave_0()) ....... B12 % lies_1(asked_0()) | ~person_1(asked_0()) | isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) ....... R9 [R8:L0, B12:L2] % person_1(asked_0()) ....... U0 % lies_1(asked_0()) | isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) ....... R10 [R9:L1, U0:L0] % ~isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | tell_the_truth_1(x0) ....... B4 % lies_1(asked_0()) | tell_the_truth_1(asked_0()) ....... R11 [R10:L1, B4:L0] % ~tell_the_truth_1(asked_0()) ....... U3 % lies_1(asked_0()) ....... R12 [R11:L1, U3:L0] % Derivation of unit clause U5: % ~isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | tell_the_truth_1(x0) ....... B4 % ~tell_the_truth_1(asked_0()) | ~isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | response_1(yes_0()) ....... B11 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | ~isa_2(x0, knight_0()) | response_1(yes_0()) ....... R1 [B4:L1, B11:L0] % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | response_1(yes_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, R1:L1] % ~lies_1(asked_0()) | ~response_1(yes_0()) | ~isa_2(x0,knight_0()) ....... B9 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | ~lies_1(asked_0()) | ~isa_2(x0, knight_0()) ....... R3 [R2:L1, B9:L1] % ~lies_1(asked_0()) | ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) ....... R4 [R3:L0, R3:L2] % ~isa_2(x0,knave_0()) | lies_1(x0) ....... B5 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | ~isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) ....... R5 [R4:L0, B5:L1] % ~person_1(x0) | isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | isa_2(x0,knave_0()) ....... B12 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) | ~person_1(asked_0()) | isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) ....... R6 [R5:L0, B12:L1] % person_1(asked_0()) ....... U0 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) | isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) ....... R7 [R6:L1, U0:L0] % ~person_1(x0) | isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | isa_2(x0,knave_0()) ....... B12 % isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) | ~person_1(asked_0()) | isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) ....... R8 [R7:L0, B12:L2] % person_1(asked_0()) ....... U0 % isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) | isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) ....... R9 [R8:L1, U0:L0] % ~isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | tell_the_truth_1(x0) ....... B4 % isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) | tell_the_truth_1(asked_0()) ....... R10 [R9:L1, B4:L0] % ~lies_1(x0) | ~tell_the_truth_1(x0) ....... B3 % isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) | ~lies_1(asked_0()) ....... R11 [R10:L1, B3:L1] % lies_1(asked_0()) ....... U4 % isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) ....... R12 [R11:L1, U4:L0] % Derivation of unit clause U6: % ~isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | tell_the_truth_1(x0) ....... B4 % ~tell_the_truth_1(asked_0()) | ~isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | response_1(yes_0()) ....... B11 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | ~isa_2(x0, knight_0()) | response_1(yes_0()) ....... R1 [B4:L1, B11:L0] % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | response_1(yes_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, R1:L1] % ~lies_1(asked_0()) | ~response_1(yes_0()) | ~isa_2(x0,knight_0()) ....... B9 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | ~lies_1(asked_0()) | ~isa_2(x0, knight_0()) ....... R3 [R2:L1, B9:L1] % ~lies_1(asked_0()) | ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) ....... R4 [R3:L0, R3:L2] % ~person_1(x0) | isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | isa_2(x0,knave_0()) ....... B12 % ~lies_1(asked_0()) | ~person_1(asked_0()) | isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) ....... R5 [R4:L1, B12:L1] % lies_1(asked_0()) ....... U4 % ~person_1(asked_0()) | isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) ....... R6 [R5:L0, U4:L0] % ~response_1(x0) | ~isa_2(other_0(),x2) | ~isa_2(asked_0(),x1) ....... B0 % ~person_1(asked_0()) | ~response_1(x0) | ~isa_2(other_0(), x1) ....... R7 [R6:L1, B0:L2] % person_1(asked_0()) ....... U0 % ~response_1(x0) | ~isa_2(other_0(), x1) ....... R8 [R7:L0, U0:L0] % response_1(yes_0()) | response_1(no_0()) ....... B7 % ~isa_2(other_0(), x0) | response_1(no_0()) ....... R9 [R8:L0, B7:L0] % ~response_1(x0) | ~isa_2(other_0(),x2) | ~isa_2(asked_0(),x1) ....... B0 % ~isa_2(other_0(), x0) | ~isa_2(other_0(), x1) | ~isa_2(asked_0(), x2) ....... R10 [R9:L1, B0:L0] % ~isa_2(other_0(), x0) | ~isa_2(asked_0(), x1) ....... R11 [R10:L0, R10:L1] % isa_2(asked_0(),knave_0()) ....... U5 % ~isa_2(other_0(), x0) ....... R12 [R11:L1, U5:L0] % Derivation of unit clause U9: % ~isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | tell_the_truth_1(x0) ....... B4 % ~tell_the_truth_1(asked_0()) | ~isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | response_1(yes_0()) ....... B11 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | ~isa_2(x0, knight_0()) | response_1(yes_0()) ....... R1 [B4:L1, B11:L0] % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | response_1(yes_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, R1:L1] % ~lies_1(asked_0()) | ~response_1(yes_0()) | ~isa_2(x0,knight_0()) ....... B9 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | ~lies_1(asked_0()) | ~isa_2(x0, knight_0()) ....... R3 [R2:L1, B9:L1] % ~lies_1(asked_0()) | ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) ....... R4 [R3:L0, R3:L2] % ~person_1(x0) | isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | isa_2(x0,knave_0()) ....... B12 % ~lies_1(asked_0()) | ~person_1(asked_0()) | isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) ....... R5 [R4:L1, B12:L1] % lies_1(asked_0()) ....... U4 % ~person_1(asked_0()) | isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) ....... R6 [R5:L0, U4:L0] % ~response_1(x0) | ~isa_2(other_0(),x2) | ~isa_2(asked_0(),x1) ....... B0 % ~person_1(asked_0()) | ~response_1(x0) | ~isa_2(other_0(), x1) ....... R7 [R6:L1, B0:L2] % person_1(asked_0()) ....... U0 % ~response_1(x0) | ~isa_2(other_0(), x1) ....... R8 [R7:L0, U0:L0] % response_1(yes_0()) | response_1(no_0()) ....... B7 % ~isa_2(other_0(), x0) | response_1(yes_0()) ....... R9 [R8:L0, B7:L1] % ~person_1(x0) | isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | isa_2(x0,knave_0()) ....... B12 % response_1(yes_0()) | ~person_1(other_0()) | isa_2(other_0(), knave_0()) ....... R10 [R9:L0, B12:L1] % person_1(other_0()) ....... U1 % response_1(yes_0()) | isa_2(other_0(), knave_0()) ....... R11 [R10:L1, U1:L0] % ~isa_2(other_0(),x0) ....... U6 % response_1(yes_0()) ....... R12 [R11:L1, U6:L0] % Derivation of unit clause U13: % ~isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | tell_the_truth_1(x0) ....... B4 % ~tell_the_truth_1(asked_0()) | ~isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | response_1(yes_0()) ....... B11 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | ~isa_2(x0, knight_0()) | response_1(yes_0()) ....... R1 [B4:L1, B11:L0] % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | response_1(yes_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, R1:L1] % ~lies_1(asked_0()) | ~response_1(yes_0()) | ~isa_2(x0,knight_0()) ....... B9 % ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) | ~lies_1(asked_0()) | ~isa_2(x0, knight_0()) ....... R3 [R2:L1, B9:L1] % ~lies_1(asked_0()) | ~isa_2(asked_0(), knight_0()) ....... R4 [R3:L0, R3:L2] % ~person_1(x0) | isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | isa_2(x0,knave_0()) ....... B12 % ~lies_1(asked_0()) | ~person_1(asked_0()) | isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) ....... R5 [R4:L1, B12:L1] % lies_1(asked_0()) ....... U4 % ~person_1(asked_0()) | isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0()) ....... R6 [R5:L0, U4:L0] % ~isa_2(x0,knave_0()) | lies_1(x0) ....... B5 % ~person_1(asked_0()) | lies_1(asked_0()) ....... R7 [R6:L1, B5:L0] % ~lies_1(asked_0()) | ~response_1(yes_0()) | ~isa_2(x0,knight_0()) ....... B9 % ~person_1(asked_0()) | ~response_1(yes_0()) | ~isa_2(x0, knight_0()) ....... R8 [R7:L1, B9:L0] % person_1(asked_0()) ....... U0 % ~response_1(yes_0()) | ~isa_2(x0, knight_0()) ....... R9 [R8:L0, U0:L0] % ~person_1(x0) | isa_2(x0,knight_0()) | isa_2(x0,knave_0()) ....... B12 % ~response_1(yes_0()) | ~person_1(x0) | isa_2(x0, knave_0()) ....... R10 [R9:L1, B12:L1] % response_1(yes_0()) ....... U9 % ~person_1(x0) | isa_2(x0, knave_0()) ....... R11 [R10:L0, U9:L0] % person_1(other_0()) ....... U1 % isa_2(other_0(), knave_0()) ....... R12 [R11:L0, U1:L0] % Derivation of the empty clause: % isa_2(other_0(),knave_0()) ....... U13 % ~isa_2(other_0(),x0) ....... U6 % [] ....... R1 [U13:L0, U6:L0] % --------------- End of Proof --------------- % PROOF FOUND! % --------------------------------------------- % | Statistics | % --------------------------------------------- % Profile 3: Performance Statistics: % ================================== % Total number of generated clauses: 1643977 % resolvents: 1608047 factors: 35930 % Number of unit clauses generated: 921 % % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.06 % Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]: % ============================================================= % [0] = 2 [12] = 12 % Total = 14 % Number of generated clauses having [x] literals: % ------------------------------------------------ % [1] = 921 [2] = 929762 [3] = 713294 % Average size of a generated clause: 3.0 % Number of unit clauses per predicate list: % ========================================== % [0] lies_1 (+)2 (-)0 % [1] person_1 (+)2 (-)0 % [2] response_1 (+)2 (-)0 % [3] tell_the_truth_1 (+)1 (-)1 % [4] isa_2 (+)2 (-)4 % ------------------ % Total: (+)9 (-)5 % Total number of unit clauses retained: 14 % Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 2252005 % N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses % because of the shortest resolvents table: 909500 % Number of successful unifications: 1644061 % Number of unification failures: 357535 % Number of unit to unit unification failures: 6 % N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 5206705 % N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 6460710 % N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0 % Max entries in substitution set: 11 % N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 591 % N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0 % N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0 % N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0 % Max number of terms in a unit clause: 2 % Max term depth in a unit clause: 1 % Number of states in UCFA table: 14 % Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 20 % Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000 % Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00 % Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.70 % Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 45 % Profile 2: Number of calls to: % ============================== % PTUnify() = 2001596 % ConstructUnitClause() = 603 % Profile 1: Time spent in: % ========================= % ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs % -------------------------------------------------------- % | | % Inferences per sec: 547992 % | | % -------------------------------------------------------- % Elapsed time: 3 secs % CPU time: 3.40 secs % %------------------------------------------------------------------------------