↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : PUZ035-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:01:39 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.28s 0.57s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.28s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   17 (   6 unt;   7 nHn;  17 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   34 (   0 equ;  15 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (  12 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_answer,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ says(asked,X3)
    | ~ truth(isa(other,X2))
    | ~ truth(isa(asked,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_answer) ).

cnf(everyone_a_knight_or_knave,axiom,
    ( ~ person(X1)
    | truth(isa(X1,knave))
    | truth(isa(X1,knight)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',everyone_a_knight_or_knave) ).

cnf(one_is_knight_answer,axiom,
    ( says(asked,not(or(isa(asked,knight),isa(other,knight))))
    | says(asked,or(isa(asked,knight),isa(other,knight))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',one_is_knight_answer) ).

cnf(asked_person,axiom,
    person(asked),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',asked_person) ).

cnf(other_person,axiom,
    person(other),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',other_person) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ says(asked,X3)
    | ~ truth(isa(other,X2))
    | ~ truth(isa(asked,X1)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_answer]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( ~ person(X1)
    | truth(isa(X1,knave))
    | truth(isa(X1,knight)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[everyone_a_knight_or_knave]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ says(asked,X3)
    | ~ truth(isa(other,X2))
    | ~ truth(isa(asked,X1)) ),
    c_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    ( says(asked,not(or(isa(asked,knight),isa(other,knight))))
    | says(asked,or(isa(asked,knight),isa(other,knight))) ),
    one_is_knight_answer ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ person(X1)
    | truth(isa(X1,knave))
    | truth(isa(X1,knight)) ),
    c_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    person(asked),
    asked_person ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    person(other),
    other_person ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ truth(isa(other,X2))
    | ~ truth(isa(asked,X1)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( truth(isa(asked,knight))
    | truth(isa(asked,knave)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( truth(isa(other,knight))
    | truth(isa(other,knave)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ truth(isa(other,X1)),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_15]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : PUZ035-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.43  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.43  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 03:48:16 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.44  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.51  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.51  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/0.57  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.28/0.57  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/0.57  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/0.57  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.28/0.57  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.57  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.57  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.57  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3337110 completed with status 0
% 0.28/0.57  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.28/0.57  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/0.57  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/0.57  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.28/0.57  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.28/0.57  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.28/0.57  % Search class: FGHNF-FFSS21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.28/0.57  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.28/0.57  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.57  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.57  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.57  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.57  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.57  % new_bool_3 with pid 3337117 completed with status 0
% 0.28/0.57  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.28/0.57  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/0.57  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/0.57  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.28/0.57  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.28/0.57  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.28/0.57  % Search class: FGHNF-FFSS21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.28/0.57  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.28/0.57  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.57  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.57  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.57  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.57  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.28/0.57  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.28/0.57  
% 0.28/0.57  % Proof found!
% 0.28/0.57  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.28/0.57  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.28/0.57  % Parsed axioms                        : 14
% 0.28/0.57  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.28/0.57  % Initial clauses                      : 14
% 0.28/0.57  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.28/0.57  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 14
% 0.28/0.57  % Processed clauses                    : 32
% 0.28/0.57  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.28/0.57  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.28/0.57  % ...remaining for further processing  : 32
% 0.28/0.57  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.28/0.57  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.28/0.57  % Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.28/0.57  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.28/0.57  % Generated clauses                    : 9
% 0.28/0.57  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 8
% 0.28/0.57  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.28/0.57  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.28/0.57  % Paramodulations                      : 8
% 0.28/0.57  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.28/0.57  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.28/0.57  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.28/0.57  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.28/0.57  % Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.28/0.57  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.28/0.57  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.28/0.57  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.28/0.57  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.28/0.57  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.28/0.57  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.28/0.57  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.28/0.57  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.28/0.57  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.28/0.57  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.28/0.57  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.28/0.57  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.28/0.57  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.28/0.57  % Current number of processed clauses  : 15
% 0.28/0.57  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
% 0.28/0.57  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.28/0.57  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.28/0.57  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 12
% 0.28/0.57  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
% 0.28/0.57  % ...number of literals in the above   : 12
% 0.28/0.57  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.28/0.57  % Current number of archived clauses   : 17
% 0.28/0.57  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 26
% 0.28/0.57  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19
% 0.28/0.57  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3
% 0.28/0.57  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.28/0.57  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.28/0.57  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.28/0.57  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.28/0.57  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.28/0.57  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.28/0.57  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 795
% 0.28/0.57  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 41
% 0.28/0.57  
% 0.28/0.57  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.57  % User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.28/0.57  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.28/0.57  % Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.28/0.57  % Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
% 0.28/0.57  
% 0.28/0.57  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.57  % User time                : 0.020 s
% 0.28/0.57  % System time              : 0.018 s
% 0.28/0.57  % Total time               : 0.038 s
% 0.28/0.57  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.28/0.57  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------