%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CARINE---0.734 % Problem : PUZ035-5 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.0.0. % Transfm : add_equality % Format : carine % Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000 % Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu % Model : i686 i686 % CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz % Memory : 2018MB % OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Sun Nov 28 04:04:21 EST 2010 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s % Output : Refutation 0.16s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % Command entered: % /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP27694/PUZ/PUZ035-5+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000 % CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003) % Initializing tables ... done. % Parsing ......... done. % Calculating time slices ... done. % Building Lookup Tables ... done. % Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 18] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1] % Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 177] [nf = 8] [nu = 0] [ut = 1] % Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ... % +================================================+ % | | % | Congratulations!!! ........ A proof was found. | % | | % +================================================+ % Base Clauses and Unit Clauses used in proof: % ============================================ % Base Clauses: % ------------- % B0: ~truth_1(isa_2(other_0(),x1)) | ~truth_1(isa_2(asked_0(),x0)) % B4: truth_1(isa_2(x0,knight_0())) | truth_1(isa_2(x0,knave_0())) % Unit Clauses: % -------------- % U1: < d3 v1 dv1 f1 c1 t3 td2 > ~truth_1(isa_2(asked_0(),x0)) % U2: < d3 v0 dv0 f1 c2 t3 td2 > truth_1(isa_2(other_0(),knave_0())) % U3: < d3 v1 dv1 f1 c1 t3 td2 > ~truth_1(isa_2(other_0(),x0)) % --------------- Start of Proof --------------- % Derivation of unit clause U1: % ~truth_1(isa_2(other_0(),x1)) | ~truth_1(isa_2(asked_0(),x0)) ....... B0 % truth_1(isa_2(x0,knight_0())) | truth_1(isa_2(x0,knave_0())) ....... B4 % ~truth_1(isa_2(asked_0(), x0)) | truth_1(isa_2(other_0(), knave_0())) ....... R1 [B0:L0, B4:L0] % ~truth_1(isa_2(other_0(),x1)) | ~truth_1(isa_2(asked_0(),x0)) ....... B0 % ~truth_1(isa_2(asked_0(), x0)) | ~truth_1(isa_2(asked_0(), x1)) ....... R2 [R1:L1, B0:L0] % ~truth_1(isa_2(asked_0(), x0)) ....... R3 [R2:L0, R2:L1] % Derivation of unit clause U2: % ~truth_1(isa_2(other_0(),x1)) | ~truth_1(isa_2(asked_0(),x0)) ....... B0 % truth_1(isa_2(x0,knight_0())) | truth_1(isa_2(x0,knave_0())) ....... B4 % ~truth_1(isa_2(asked_0(), x0)) | truth_1(isa_2(other_0(), knave_0())) ....... R1 [B0:L0, B4:L0] % truth_1(isa_2(x0,knight_0())) | truth_1(isa_2(x0,knave_0())) ....... B4 % truth_1(isa_2(other_0(), knave_0())) | truth_1(isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0())) ....... R2 [R1:L0, B4:L0] % ~truth_1(isa_2(asked_0(),x0)) ....... U1 % truth_1(isa_2(other_0(), knave_0())) ....... R3 [R2:L1, U1:L0] % Derivation of unit clause U3: % ~truth_1(isa_2(other_0(),x1)) | ~truth_1(isa_2(asked_0(),x0)) ....... B0 % truth_1(isa_2(x0,knight_0())) | truth_1(isa_2(x0,knave_0())) ....... B4 % ~truth_1(isa_2(other_0(), x0)) | truth_1(isa_2(asked_0(), knave_0())) ....... R1 [B0:L1, B4:L0] % ~truth_1(isa_2(other_0(),x1)) | ~truth_1(isa_2(asked_0(),x0)) ....... B0 % ~truth_1(isa_2(other_0(), x0)) | ~truth_1(isa_2(other_0(), x1)) ....... R2 [R1:L1, B0:L1] % ~truth_1(isa_2(other_0(), x0)) ....... R3 [R2:L0, R2:L1] % Derivation of the empty clause: % ~truth_1(isa_2(other_0(),x0)) ....... U3 % truth_1(isa_2(other_0(),knave_0())) ....... U2 % [] ....... R1 [U3:L0, U2:L0] % --------------- End of Proof --------------- % PROOF FOUND! % --------------------------------------------- % | Statistics | % --------------------------------------------- % Profile 3: Performance Statistics: % ================================== % Total number of generated clauses: 238 % resolvents: 226 factors: 12 % Number of unit clauses generated: 6 % % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 2.52 % Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]: % ============================================================= % [0] = 1 [3] = 3 % Total = 4 % Number of generated clauses having [x] literals: % ------------------------------------------------ % [1] = 6 [2] = 197 [3] = 35 % Average size of a generated clause: 3.0 % Number of unit clauses per predicate list: % ========================================== % [0] truth_1 (+)1 (-)2 % [1] says_2 (+)1 (-)0 % ------------------ % Total: (+)2 (-)2 % Total number of unit clauses retained: 4 % Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 122 % N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses % because of the shortest resolvents table: 0 % Number of successful unifications: 247 % Number of unification failures: 22 % Number of unit to unit unification failures: 1 % N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 248 % N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 135 % N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0 % Max entries in substitution set: 5 % N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 1 % N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0 % N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0 % N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0 % Max number of terms in a unit clause: 8 % Max term depth in a unit clause: 3 % Number of states in UCFA table: 18 % Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 17 % Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 112000 % Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00 % Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.06 % Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 42 % Profile 2: Number of calls to: % ============================== % PTUnify() = 269 % ConstructUnitClause() = 4 % Profile 1: Time spent in: % ========================= % ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs % -------------------------------------------------------- % | | % Inferences per sec: inf % | | % -------------------------------------------------------- % Elapsed time: 0 secs % CPU time: 0.15 secs % %------------------------------------------------------------------------------