↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : PUZ037-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:01:40 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   12 (   0 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-54 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  162 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(myx,axiom,
    ( ~ state(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10,X11,X12,X13,X14,X15,X16,X17,X18,X19,X20,X21,X22,X23,X24,X25,X26,X27,X28,X29,X30,X31,X32,X33,X34,X35,X36,X37,X38,X39,X40,X41,X42,X43,X44,X45,X46,X47,X48,X49,X50,X51,X52,X53,X54)
    | state(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10,X11,X12,X13,X14,X15,X16,X17,X18,X19,X20,X21,X31,X32,X33,X22,X23,X24,X25,X26,X27,X28,X29,X30,X34,X35,X36,X37,X38,X39,X40,X41,X42,X43,X44,X45,X46,X47,X48,X49,X50,X51,X52,X53,X54) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',myx) ).

cnf(make_like_this,negated_conjecture,
    ~ state(b,b,b,b,b,b,b,b,b,r,r,r,g,g,g,o,o,o,y,y,y,r,r,r,g,g,g,o,o,o,y,y,y,r,r,r,g,g,g,o,o,o,y,y,y,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',make_like_this) ).

cnf(start_with_this,hypothesis,
    state(b,b,b,b,b,b,b,b,b,r,r,r,g,g,g,o,o,o,y,y,y,g,g,g,o,o,o,y,y,y,r,r,r,r,r,r,g,g,g,o,o,o,y,y,y,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',start_with_this) ).

cnf(c_0_3,plain,
    ( ~ state(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10,X11,X12,X13,X14,X15,X16,X17,X18,X19,X20,X21,X22,X23,X24,X25,X26,X27,X28,X29,X30,X31,X32,X33,X34,X35,X36,X37,X38,X39,X40,X41,X42,X43,X44,X45,X46,X47,X48,X49,X50,X51,X52,X53,X54)
    | state(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10,X11,X12,X13,X14,X15,X16,X17,X18,X19,X20,X21,X31,X32,X33,X22,X23,X24,X25,X26,X27,X28,X29,X30,X34,X35,X36,X37,X38,X39,X40,X41,X42,X43,X44,X45,X46,X47,X48,X49,X50,X51,X52,X53,X54) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[myx]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ state(b,b,b,b,b,b,b,b,b,r,r,r,g,g,g,o,o,o,y,y,y,r,r,r,g,g,g,o,o,o,y,y,y,r,r,r,g,g,g,o,o,o,y,y,y,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[make_like_this]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( ~ state(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10,X11,X12,X13,X14,X15,X16,X17,X18,X19,X20,X21,X22,X23,X24,X25,X26,X27,X28,X29,X30,X31,X32,X33,X34,X35,X36,X37,X38,X39,X40,X41,X42,X43,X44,X45,X46,X47,X48,X49,X50,X51,X52,X53,X54)
    | state(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10,X11,X12,X13,X14,X15,X16,X17,X18,X19,X20,X21,X31,X32,X33,X22,X23,X24,X25,X26,X27,X28,X29,X30,X34,X35,X36,X37,X38,X39,X40,X41,X42,X43,X44,X45,X46,X47,X48,X49,X50,X51,X52,X53,X54) ),
    c_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
    state(b,b,b,b,b,b,b,b,b,r,r,r,g,g,g,o,o,o,y,y,y,g,g,g,o,o,o,y,y,y,r,r,r,r,r,r,g,g,g,o,o,o,y,y,y,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w),
    start_with_this ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ state(b,b,b,b,b,b,b,b,b,r,r,r,g,g,g,o,o,o,y,y,y,r,r,r,g,g,g,o,o,o,y,y,y,r,r,r,g,g,g,o,o,o,y,y,y,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w),
    c_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : PUZ037-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.38  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 03:46:35 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.46  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.46  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.46  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.46  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.46  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.46  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.46  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.46  % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 3065041 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.12/0.46  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.46  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.46  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.46  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.46  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.46  % Search class: FHUNF-FFLF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.46  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.46  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.46  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.46  % Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.46  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.46  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.46  % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 3065047 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.12/0.46  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.46  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.46  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.46  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.46  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.46  % Search class: FHUNF-FFLF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.46  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.46  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.46  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.46  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.12/0.46  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.46  
% 0.12/0.46  % Proof found!
% 0.12/0.46  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.12/0.46  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.46  % Parsed axioms                        : 20
% 0.12/0.46  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Initial clauses                      : 20
% 0.12/0.46  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 20
% 0.12/0.46  % Processed clauses                    : 37
% 0.12/0.46  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % ...remaining for further processing  : 37
% 0.12/0.46  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Generated clauses                    : 15
% 0.12/0.46  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 14
% 0.12/0.46  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Paramodulations                      : 15
% 0.12/0.46  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.12/0.46  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.12/0.46  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.46  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.12/0.46  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.46  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.12/0.46  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.12/0.46  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.12/0.46  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.12/0.46  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.12/0.46  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.12/0.46  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.12/0.46  % Current number of processed clauses  : 17
% 0.12/0.46  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.12/0.46  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.46  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.12/0.46  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 15
% 0.12/0.46  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 17
% 0.12/0.46  % ...number of literals in the above   : 20
% 0.12/0.46  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Current number of archived clauses   : 20
% 0.12/0.46  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 516
% 0.12/0.46  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 516
% 0.12/0.46  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.12/0.46  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.12/0.46  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1623
% 0.12/0.46  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 22
% 0.12/0.46  
% 0.12/0.46  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.46  % User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.12/0.46  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.12/0.46  % Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.12/0.46  % Maximum resident set size: 3664 pages
% 0.12/0.46  
% 0.12/0.46  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.46  % User time                : 0.026 s
% 0.12/0.46  % System time              : 0.017 s
% 0.12/0.46  % Total time               : 0.043 s
% 0.12/0.46  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.12/0.46  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------