↑ Up

E---3.5.1.SAT-Sat.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : PUZ044-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:01:41 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.14s 0.44s
% Output   : Saturation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_6ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_11ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(X2)
    | ~ a_truth(says(X1,X2))
    | ~ a_truth(liar(X1)) ),
    c_0_6,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(says(X1,X2))
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(X1))
    | a_truth(X2) ),
    c_0_7,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(says(X2,X1))
    | ~ a_truth(X1)
    | a_truth(truthteller(X2)) ),
    c_0_8,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(says(X2,X1))
    | a_truth(liar(X2))
    | a_truth(X1) ),
    c_0_9,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(liar(X1))
    | ~ a_truth(truthteller(X1)) ),
    c_0_10,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    ( a_truth(liar(X1))
    | a_truth(truthteller(X1)) ),
    truthteller_or_liar,
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : PUZ044-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.38  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 03:49:48 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.44  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 2361269 completed with status 1
% 0.14/0.44  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.14/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.44  % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S032N with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2361273 completed with status 1
% 0.14/0.44  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.44  % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  % No proof found!
% 0.14/0.44  % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.14/0.44  % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.44  % Parsed axioms                        : 6
% 0.14/0.44  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Initial clauses                      : 6
% 0.14/0.44  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 6
% 0.14/0.44  % Processed clauses                    : 6
% 0.14/0.44  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % ...remaining for further processing  : 6
% 0.14/0.44  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Generated clauses                    : 1
% 0.14/0.44  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Paramodulations                      : 1
% 0.14/0.44  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  % Current number of processed clauses  : 6
% 0.14/0.44  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 6
% 0.14/0.44  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.45  % ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 261
% 0.14/0.45  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 16
% 0.14/0.45  
% 0.14/0.45  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.45  % User time                : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.45  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.45  % Total time               : 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.45  % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.14/0.45  
% 0.14/0.45  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.45  % User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.14/0.45  % System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.14/0.45  % Total time               : 0.018 s
% 0.14/0.45  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.14/0.45  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------