↑ Up

SPASS-SCL---0.1.SAT-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS-SCL---0.1
% Problem  : PUZ046-1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  7 07:31:28 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.32s 0.55s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : PUZ046-1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.36  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.18/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.18/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.36  % DateTime : Thu May  7 12:58:49 EDT 2026
% 0.18/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.36  SPASS-SCL-FOL version:
% 0.21/0.42  SPASS-SCL-FOL 0.1 (595c0c7b1) [parallel mode]
% 0.32/0.55  Starting: ./SPASS-SCL-FOL --heuristics_normal -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/0.55  Starting: ./SPASS-SCL-FOL --heuristics_resolution_1 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/0.55  Starting: ./SPASS-SCL-FOL --heuristics_resolution_2 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/0.55  Starting: ./SPASS-SCL-FOL --heuristics_resolution_3 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/0.55  Starting: ./SPASS-SCL-FOL --heuristics_lmodel_grow -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/0.55  Execution resolution_1 ended with status: satisfiable
% 0.32/0.55  Used heuristic: resolution_1
% 0.32/0.55  
% 0.32/0.55   Input Clauses:
% 0.32/0.55  
% 0.32/0.55   Predicates: state 
% 0.32/0.55   Fol Constants: a 
% 0.32/0.55   Fol Functions: s1 s e1 s2 s3 s4 v1 e2 v2 v3 v4 h bb 
% 0.32/0.55   Problem Properties:
% 0.32/0.55   This is a full first-order problem without equality.
% 0.32/0.55  
% 0.32/0.55   After reduction:  Problem Properties:
% 0.32/0.55   This is a full first-order problem without equality.
% 0.32/0.55  
% 0.32/0.55  
% 0.32/0.55   Reduced Input Clauses:
% 0.32/0.55  
% 0.32/0.55   Most General Atoms: state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,s1(x6,x7),x8,x9,x10,e1(x6,s(x7)),x11) state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,s1(x6,s(x7)),x8,x9,x10,e1(x6,x7),x11) state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,s1(x6,x7),x8,x9,x10,e1(s(x6),x7),x11) state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,s1(s(x6),x7),x8,x9,x10,e1(x6,x7),x11) state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,s2(x7,x8),x9,x10,e1(x7,s(x8)),x11) state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,s2(x7,s(x8)),x9,x10,e1(x7,x8),x11) state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,s2(x7,x8),x9,x10,e1(s(x7),x8),x11) state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,s2(s(x7),x8),x9,x10,e1(x7,x8),x11) state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,s3(x8,x9),x10,e1(x8,s(x9)),x11) state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,s3(x8,s(x9)),x10,e1(x8,x9),x11) state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,s3(x8,x9),x10,e1(s(x8),x9),x11) state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,s3(s(x8),x9),x10,e1(x8,x9),x11) state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,x8,s4(x9,x10),e1(x9,s(x10)),x11) state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,x8,s4(x9,s(x10)),e1(x9,x10),x11) state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,x8,s4(x9,x10),e1(s(x9),x10),x11) state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,x8,s4(s(x9),x10),e1(x9,x10),x11) state(x0,v1(x1,x2),x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,x8,x9,x10,e1(s(s(x1)),x2),x11) state(x0,v1(s(x1),x2),x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,x8,x9,x10,e1(x1,x2),x11) state(x0,x1,v2(x2,x3),x4,x5,x6,x7,x8,x9,x10,e1(s(s(x2)),x3),x11) state(x0,x1,v2(s(x2),x3),x4,x5,x6,x7,x8,x9,x10,e1(x2,x3),x11) state(x0,x1,x2,v3(x3,x4),x5,x6,x7,x8,x9,x10,e1(s(s(x3)),x4),x11) state(x0,x1,x2,v3(s(x3),x4),x5,x6,x7,x8,x9,x10,e1(x3,x4),x11) state(x0,x1,x2,x3,v4(x4,x5),x6,x7,x8,x9,x10,e1(s(s(x4)),x5),x11) state(x0,x1,x2,x3,v4(s(x4),x5),x6,x7,x8,x9,x10,e1(x4,x5),x11) state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,h(x5,x6),x7,x8,x9,x10,e1(x5,s(s(x6))),x11) state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,h(x5,s(x6)),x7,x8,x9,x10,e1(x5,x6),x11) state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,x8,x9,e1(x12,x13),e2(x10,x11)) 
% 0.32/0.55  
% 0.32/0.55  === Starting SPASS-SCL-FOL A Little Less Naive, considering 66 atoms initially, heuristics mode: resolution_1 ===
% 0.32/0.55  
% 0.32/0.55  === Backtracking. Learning clause 42:2:11:[13.2,10.1]:TopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTop: state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,s3(x8,s(x9)),s4(x8,x9),e1(x8,s(x9)),x10) -> state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,s3(x8,x9),s4(x8,s(x9)),e1(x8,s(x9)),x10)
% 0.32/0.55  === Backtracking. Learning clause 43:2:11:[13.2,12.1]:TopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTop: state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,s3(s(x8),x9),s4(x8,x9),e1(x8,s(x9)),x10) -> state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,s3(x8,x9),s4(x8,s(x9)),e1(s(x8),x9),x10)
% 0.32/0.55  === Backtracking. Learning clause 44:2:11:[13.2,6.1]:TopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTop: state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,s2(x7,s(x8)),x9,s4(x7,x8),e1(x7,s(x8)),x10) -> state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,s2(x7,x8),x9,s4(x7,s(x8)),e1(x7,s(x8)),x10)
% 0.32/0.55  === Backtracking. Learning clause 45:2:11:[9.2,6.1]:TopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTop: state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,s2(x7,s(x8)),s3(x7,x8),x9,e1(x7,s(x8)),x10) -> state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,s2(x7,x8),s3(x7,s(x8)),x9,e1(x7,s(x8)),x10)
% 0.32/0.55  === Backtracking. Learning clause 46:2:11:[11.2,6.1]:TopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTop: state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,s2(x7,s(x8)),s3(x7,x8),x9,e1(s(x7),x8),x10) -> state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,s2(x7,x8),s3(s(x7),x8),x9,e1(x7,s(x8)),x10)
% 0.32/0.55  === Backtracking. Learning clause 47:2:11:[13.2,8.1]:TopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTop: state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,s2(s(x7),x8),x9,s4(x7,x8),e1(x7,s(x8)),x10) -> state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,s2(x7,x8),x9,s4(x7,s(x8)),e1(s(x7),x8),x10)
% 0.32/0.55  === Backtracking. Learning clause 48:2:11:[9.2,8.1]:TopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTop: state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,s2(s(x7),x8),s3(x7,x8),x9,e1(x7,s(x8)),x10) -> state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,s2(x7,x8),s3(x7,s(x8)),x9,e1(s(x7),x8),x10)
% 0.32/0.55  === Backtracking. Learning clause 49:2:11:[11.2,8.1]:TopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTop: state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,s2(s(x7),x8),s3(x7,x8),x9,e1(s(x7),x8),x10) -> state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,s2(x7,x8),s3(s(x7),x8),x9,e1(s(x7),x8),x10)
% 0.32/0.55  === Backtracking. Learning clause 50:2:11:[13.2,2.1]:TopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTop: state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,s1(x6,s(x7)),x8,x9,s4(x6,x7),e1(x6,s(x7)),x10) -> state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,s1(x6,x7),x8,x9,s4(x6,s(x7)),e1(x6,s(x7)),x10)
% 0.32/0.55  === Backtracking. Learning clause 51:2:11:[9.2,2.1]:TopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTop: state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,s1(x6,s(x7)),x8,s3(x6,x7),x9,e1(x6,s(x7)),x10) -> state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,s1(x6,x7),x8,s3(x6,s(x7)),x9,e1(x6,s(x7)),x10)
% 0.32/0.55  === Backtracking. Learning clause 52:2:11:[11.2,2.1]:TopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTop: state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,s1(x6,s(x7)),x8,s3(x6,x7),x9,e1(s(x6),x7),x10) -> state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,s1(x6,x7),x8,s3(s(x6),x7),x9,e1(x6,s(x7)),x10)
% 0.32/0.55  === Backtracking. Learning clause 53:2:11:[5.2,2.1]:TopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTop: state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,s1(x6,s(x7)),s2(x6,x7),x8,x9,e1(x6,s(x7)),x10) -> state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,s1(x6,x7),s2(x6,s(x7)),x8,x9,e1(x6,s(x7)),x10)
% 0.32/0.55  === Backtracking. Learning clause 54:2:11:[7.2,2.1]:TopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTop: state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,s1(x6,s(x7)),s2(x6,x7),x8,x9,e1(s(x6),x7),x10) -> state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,s1(x6,x7),s2(s(x6),x7),x8,x9,e1(x6,s(x7)),x10)
% 0.32/0.55  === Backtracking. Learning clause 55:2:11:[13.2,4.1]:TopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTop: state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,s1(s(x6),x7),x8,x9,s4(x6,x7),e1(x6,s(x7)),x10) -> state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,s1(x6,x7),x8,x9,s4(x6,s(x7)),e1(s(x6),x7),x10)
% 0.32/0.55  === Backtracking. Learning clause 56:2:11:[9.2,4.1]:TopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTop: state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,s1(s(x6),x7),x8,s3(x6,x7),x9,e1(x6,s(x7)),x10) -> state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,s1(x6,x7),x8,s3(x6,s(x7)),x9,e1(s(x6),x7),x10)
% 0.32/0.55  === Backtracking. Learning clause 57:2:11:[11.2,4.1]:TopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTop: state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,s1(s(x6),x7),x8,s3(x6,x7),x9,e1(s(x6),x7),x10) -> state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,s1(x6,x7),x8,s3(s(x6),x7),x9,e1(s(x6),x7),x10)
% 0.32/0.55  === Backtracking. Learning clause 58:2:11:[5.2,4.1]:TopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTop: state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,s1(s(x6),x7),s2(x6,x7),x8,x9,e1(x6,s(x7)),x10) -> state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,s1(x6,x7),s2(x6,s(x7)),x8,x9,e1(s(x6),x7),x10)
% 0.32/0.55  === Backtracking. Learning clause 59:2:11:[7.2,4.1]:TopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTop: state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,s1(s(x6),x7),s2(x6,x7),x8,x9,e1(s(x6),x7),x10) -> state(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,s1(x6,x7),s2(s(x6),x7),x8,x9,e1(s(x6),x7),x10)
% 0.32/0.55  
% 0.32/0.55  Linear Model Building succeeded.
% 0.32/0.55  SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.32/0.55  
% 0.32/0.55  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/0.55  
% 0.32/0.55  SPASS-SCL-FOL Statistics:
% 0.32/0.55  Number of learned clauses: 18
% 0.32/0.55  Number of propagations: 182
% 0.32/0.55  Number of decisions: 109
% 0.32/0.55  Number of resolutions: 18
% 0.32/0.55  Number of condensations: 0
% 0.32/0.55  Number of sub resolutions: 0
% 0.32/0.55  Number of input literals (deduplicated): 41
% 0.32/0.55  Number of grows: 0
% 0.32/0.55  Number of considered ground atoms: 66
% 0.32/0.55  
% 0.32/0.55   Needed:       0:00:00.01
% 0.32/0.55  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------