%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : PUZ047-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 13:42:13 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.55s 0.61s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.55s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.12/0.13 % Problem : PUZ047-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0. % 0.12/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 18 10:05:08 EDT 2024 % 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.21/0.57 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.55/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.61 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.55/0.61 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.55/0.61 % Transform :cnf % 0.55/0.61 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.55/0.61 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.55/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.55/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.61 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.61 % File : PUZ047-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0. % 0.55/0.61 % Domain : Syntactic % 0.55/0.61 % Problem : Taking the wolf, goat, and cabbage across river % 0.55/0.61 % Version : Especial. % 0.55/0.61 % English : % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 % Refs : [And97] Andrews (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.55/0.61 % Source : [And97] % 0.55/0.61 % Names : THM100 [And97] % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.55/0.61 % Rating : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.05 v5.2.0, 0.00 v2.5.0 % 0.55/0.61 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 2 unt; 0 nHn; 16 RR) % 0.55/0.61 % Number of literals : 30 ( 0 equ; 15 neg) % 0.55/0.61 % Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg) % 0.55/0.61 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg) % 0.55/0.61 % Number of predicates : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 5-5 aty) % 0.55/0.61 % Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty) % 0.55/0.61 % Number of variables : 19 ( 1 sgn) % 0.55/0.61 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 % Comments : % 0.55/0.61 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.61 cnf(thm100_1,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.61 p(south,south,south,south,start) ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(thm100_2,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.61 ( p(north,north,south,north,go_alone(A)) % 0.55/0.61 | ~ p(south,north,south,north,A) ) ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(thm100_3,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.61 ( p(south,north,south,north,go_alone(A)) % 0.55/0.61 | ~ p(north,north,south,north,A) ) ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(thm100_4,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.61 ( p(north,south,north,south,go_alone(A)) % 0.55/0.61 | ~ p(south,south,north,south,A) ) ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(thm100_5,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.61 ( p(south,south,north,south,go_alone(A)) % 0.55/0.61 | ~ p(north,south,north,south,A) ) ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(thm100_6,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.61 ( p(north,north,south,north,take_wolf(A)) % 0.55/0.61 | ~ p(south,south,south,north,A) ) ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(thm100_7,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.61 ( p(south,south,south,north,take_wolf(A)) % 0.55/0.61 | ~ p(north,north,south,north,A) ) ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(thm100_8,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.61 ( p(north,north,north,south,take_wolf(A)) % 0.55/0.61 | ~ p(south,south,north,south,A) ) ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(thm100_9,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.61 ( p(south,south,north,south,take_wolf(A)) % 0.55/0.61 | ~ p(north,north,north,south,A) ) ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(thm100_10,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.61 ( p(north,A,north,B,take_goat(C)) % 0.55/0.61 | ~ p(south,A,south,B,C) ) ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(thm100_11,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.61 ( p(south,A,south,B,take_goat(C)) % 0.55/0.61 | ~ p(north,A,north,B,C) ) ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(thm100_12,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.61 ( p(north,north,south,north,take_cabbage(A)) % 0.55/0.61 | ~ p(south,north,south,south,A) ) ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(thm100_13,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.61 ( p(south,north,south,south,take_cabbage(A)) % 0.55/0.61 | ~ p(north,north,south,north,A) ) ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(thm100_14,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.61 ( p(north,south,north,north,take_cabbage(A)) % 0.55/0.61 | ~ p(south,south,north,south,A) ) ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(thm100_15,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.61 ( p(south,south,north,south,take_cabbage(A)) % 0.55/0.61 | ~ p(north,south,north,north,A) ) ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 cnf(thm100_16,negated_conjecture, % 0.55/0.61 ~ p(north,north,north,north,A) ). % 0.55/0.61 % 0.55/0.61 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.61 % Proof found % 0.55/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.55/0.61 % SZS output start Proof % 0.55/0.61 %ClaNum:16(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.55/0.61 %VarNum:37(SingletonVarNum:19) % 0.55/0.61 %MaxLitNum:2 % 0.55/0.61 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 0.55/0.61 %SharedTerms:4 % 0.55/0.61 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 % 0.55/0.61 %singleGoalClaCount:2 % 0.55/0.61 [1]P1(a1,a1,a1,a1,a4) % 0.55/0.61 [2]~P1(a2,a2,a2,a2,x21) % 0.55/0.61 [3]~P1(a2,a2,a1,a2,x31)+P1(a1,a1,a1,a2,f5(x31)) % 0.55/0.61 [4]~P1(a2,a1,a2,a1,x41)+P1(a1,a1,a2,a1,f3(x41)) % 0.55/0.62 [5]~P1(a2,a2,a2,a1,x51)+P1(a1,a1,a2,a1,f5(x51)) % 0.55/0.62 [6]~P1(a2,a1,a2,a2,x61)+P1(a1,a1,a2,a1,f6(x61)) % 0.55/0.62 [7]~P1(a2,a2,a1,a2,x71)+P1(a1,a2,a1,a1,f6(x71)) % 0.55/0.62 [8]~P1(a2,a2,a1,a2,x81)+P1(a1,a2,a1,a2,f3(x81)) % 0.55/0.62 [9]~P1(a1,a1,a2,a1,x91)+P1(a2,a1,a2,a1,f3(x91)) % 0.55/0.62 [10]~P1(a1,a1,a2,a1,x101)+P1(a2,a1,a2,a2,f6(x101)) % 0.55/0.62 [11]~P1(a1,a2,a1,a2,x111)+P1(a2,a2,a1,a2,f3(x111)) % 0.55/0.62 [12]~P1(a1,a1,a1,a2,x121)+P1(a2,a2,a1,a2,f5(x121)) % 0.55/0.62 [13]~P1(a1,a2,a1,a1,x131)+P1(a2,a2,a1,a2,f6(x131)) % 0.55/0.62 [14]~P1(a1,a1,a2,a1,x141)+P1(a2,a2,a2,a1,f5(x141)) % 0.55/0.62 [15]~P1(a2,x151,a2,x152,x153)+P1(a1,x151,a1,x152,f7(x153)) % 0.55/0.62 [16]~P1(a1,x161,a1,x162,x163)+P1(a2,x161,a2,x162,f7(x163)) % 0.55/0.62 %EqnAxiom % 0.55/0.62 % 0.55/0.62 %------------------------------------------- % 0.55/0.62 cnf(20,plain, % 0.55/0.62 (~P1(a2,a2,a1,a2,x201)), % 0.55/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,16,8])). % 0.55/0.62 cnf(24,plain, % 0.55/0.62 (~P1(a1,a1,a2,a1,x241)), % 0.55/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,16,8,12,15,10])). % 0.55/0.62 cnf(26,plain, % 0.55/0.62 (~P1(a1,a1,a2,a1,x261)), % 0.55/0.62 inference(rename_variables,[],[24])). % 0.55/0.62 cnf(31,plain, % 0.55/0.62 ($false), % 0.55/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,20,24,26,4,5,13,16]), % 0.55/0.62 ['proof']). % 0.55/0.62 % SZS output end Proof % 0.55/0.62 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------