%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : PUZ047-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:02:25 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.24s 0.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 31 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 31 RR)
% Number of literals : 49 ( 0 equ; 28 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-5 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 40 ( 10 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(thm100_16,negated_conjecture,
~ p(north,north,north,north,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm100_16) ).
cnf(thm100_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(south,X1,south,X2,X3)
| p(north,X1,north,X2,take_goat(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm100_10) ).
cnf(thm100_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(north,north,south,north,X1)
| p(south,north,south,north,go_alone(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm100_3) ).
cnf(thm100_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(south,south,south,north,X1)
| p(north,north,south,north,take_wolf(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm100_6) ).
cnf(thm100_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(north,X1,north,X2,X3)
| p(south,X1,south,X2,take_goat(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm100_11) ).
cnf(thm100_14,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(south,south,north,south,X1)
| p(north,south,north,north,take_cabbage(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm100_14) ).
cnf(thm100_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(north,south,north,south,X1)
| p(south,south,north,south,go_alone(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm100_5) ).
cnf(thm100_1,negated_conjecture,
p(south,south,south,south,start),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm100_1) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ p(north,north,north,north,X1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[thm100_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(south,X1,south,X2,X3)
| p(north,X1,north,X2,take_goat(X3)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[thm100_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ p(north,north,north,north,X1),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(south,X1,south,X2,X3)
| p(north,X1,north,X2,take_goat(X3)) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(north,north,south,north,X1)
| p(south,north,south,north,go_alone(X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[thm100_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ p(south,north,south,north,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(north,north,south,north,X1)
| p(south,north,south,north,go_alone(X1)) ),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(south,south,south,north,X1)
| p(north,north,south,north,take_wolf(X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[thm100_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ p(north,north,south,north,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(south,south,south,north,X1)
| p(north,north,south,north,take_wolf(X1)) ),
c_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(north,X1,north,X2,X3)
| p(south,X1,south,X2,take_goat(X3)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[thm100_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ p(south,south,south,north,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(north,X1,north,X2,X3)
| p(south,X1,south,X2,take_goat(X3)) ),
c_0_18 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(south,south,north,south,X1)
| p(north,south,north,north,take_cabbage(X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[thm100_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
~ p(north,south,north,north,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(south,south,north,south,X1)
| p(north,south,north,north,take_cabbage(X1)) ),
c_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(north,south,north,south,X1)
| p(south,south,north,south,go_alone(X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[thm100_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ p(south,south,north,south,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(north,south,north,south,X1)
| p(south,south,north,south,go_alone(X1)) ),
c_0_24 ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
~ p(north,south,north,south,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
p(south,south,south,south,start),
thm100_1 ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
~ p(south,south,south,south,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : PUZ047-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.46 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.46 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.46 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.46 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/0.46 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/0.46 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.46 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.20/0.46 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 03:49:58 UTC 2026
% 0.20/0.47 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.54 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.54 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.57 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.24/0.57 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.57 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.57 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.57 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.57 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.57 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.57 % new_bool_1 with pid 903399 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.57 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.24/0.57 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.57 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.57 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.57 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.57 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.57 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.24/0.57 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.24/0.57 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.57 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.57 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.57 % SubtermCWHack with pid 903405 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.57 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.24/0.57 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.57 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.57 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.57 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.57 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.57 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.24/0.57 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.24/0.57 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.57 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.57 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.57 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.24/0.57
% 0.24/0.57 % Proof found!
% 0.24/0.57 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.24/0.57 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.57 % Parsed axioms : 16
% 0.24/0.57 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % Initial clauses : 16
% 0.24/0.57 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % Initial clauses in saturation : 16
% 0.24/0.57 % Processed clauses : 28
% 0.24/0.57 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % ...subsumed : 3
% 0.24/0.57 % ...remaining for further processing : 25
% 0.24/0.57 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % Backward-subsumed : 12
% 0.24/0.57 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % Generated clauses : 15
% 0.24/0.57 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 13
% 0.24/0.57 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % Paramodulations : 14
% 0.24/0.57 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % NegExts : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/0.57 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.57 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.57 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.57 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.57 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.57 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.57 % Current number of processed clauses : 12
% 0.24/0.57 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.57 % Negative unit clauses : 10
% 0.24/0.57 % Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.24/0.57 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.57 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % Current number of archived clauses : 13
% 0.24/0.57 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 8
% 0.24/0.57 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.24/0.57 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 30
% 0.24/0.57 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/0.57 % Termbank termtop insertions : 849
% 0.24/0.57 % Search garbage collected termcells : 36
% 0.24/0.57
% 0.24/0.57 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.57 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.24/0.57 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.24/0.57 % Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.24/0.57 % Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
% 0.24/0.57
% 0.24/0.57 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.57 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.24/0.57 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.24/0.57 % Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.24/0.57 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.24/0.57 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------