↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : PUZ086^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:20:33 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 0.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   48 (  26 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  159 (  16 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   18 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  300 (  56   ~;  48   |;   8   &; 188   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   30 (  30   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   19 (  17 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   87 (  36   ^;  51   !;   0   ?;  87   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_25,type,
    mnot: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    mor: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_27,type,
    mand: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_28,type,
    mimplies: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_38,type,
    mbox: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_40,type,
    mreflexive: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_50,type,
    mvalid: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_54,type,
    peter: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_55,type,
    john: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_57,type,
    time: $i > $o ).

thf(decl_58,type,
    place: $i > $o ).

thf(decl_59,type,
    appointment: $i > $o ).

thf(decl_64,type,
    esk5_0: $i ).

thf(decl_65,type,
    esk6_0: $i ).

thf(decl_66,type,
    esk7_0: $i ).

thf(decl_67,type,
    esk8_0: $i ).

thf(decl_68,type,
    esk9_0: $i ).

thf(mbox,axiom,
    ( mbox
    = ( ^ [X13: $i > $i > $o,X6: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
        ! [X14: $i] :
          ( ~ ( X13 @ X3 @ X14 )
          | ( X6 @ X14 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Uas1FLfO5p/E---3.1_3343729.p',mbox) ).

thf(mvalid,axiom,
    ( mvalid
    = ( ^ [X6: $i > $o] :
        ! [X3: $i] : ( X6 @ X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Uas1FLfO5p/E---3.1_3343729.p',mvalid) ).

thf(mreflexive,axiom,
    ( mreflexive
    = ( ^ [X13: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [X15: $i] : ( X13 @ X15 @ X15 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Uas1FLfO5p/E---3.1_3343729.p',mreflexive) ).

thf(mand,axiom,
    ( mand
    = ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X7: $i > $o] : ( mnot @ ( mor @ ( mnot @ X6 ) @ ( mnot @ X7 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Uas1FLfO5p/E---3.1_3343729.p',mand) ).

thf(mnot,axiom,
    ( mnot
    = ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
          ~ ( X6 @ X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Uas1FLfO5p/E---3.1_3343729.p',mnot) ).

thf(mor,axiom,
    ( mor
    = ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X7: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
          ( ( X6 @ X3 )
          | ( X7 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Uas1FLfO5p/E---3.1_3343729.p',mor) ).

thf(mimplies,axiom,
    ( mimplies
    = ( ^ [X6: $i > $o,X7: $i > $o] : ( mor @ ( mnot @ X6 ) @ X7 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Uas1FLfO5p/E---3.1_3343729.p',mimplies) ).

thf(ax_b,axiom,
    mvalid @ ( mbox @ peter @ ( mbox @ john @ place ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Uas1FLfO5p/E---3.1_3343729.p',ax_b) ).

thf(refl_peter,axiom,
    mreflexive @ peter,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Uas1FLfO5p/E---3.1_3343729.p',refl_peter) ).

thf(ax_a,axiom,
    mvalid @ ( mbox @ peter @ time ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Uas1FLfO5p/E---3.1_3343729.p',ax_a) ).

thf(refl_john,axiom,
    mreflexive @ john,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Uas1FLfO5p/E---3.1_3343729.p',refl_john) ).

thf(ax_d,axiom,
    mvalid @ ( mbox @ peter @ ( mbox @ john @ ( mimplies @ ( mand @ place @ time ) @ appointment ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Uas1FLfO5p/E---3.1_3343729.p',ax_d) ).

thf(conj,conjecture,
    mvalid @ ( mand @ ( mbox @ peter @ ( mbox @ john @ appointment ) ) @ ( mbox @ john @ ( mbox @ peter @ appointment ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Uas1FLfO5p/E---3.1_3343729.p',conj) ).

thf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( mbox
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
        ! [X14: $i] :
          ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 @ X14 )
          | ( Z1 @ X14 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mbox]) ).

thf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( mvalid
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o] :
        ! [X3: $i] : ( Z0 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mvalid]) ).

thf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( mreflexive
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [X15: $i] : ( Z0 @ X15 @ X15 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mreflexive]) ).

thf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( mand
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ~ ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
            | ~ ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mand]) ).

thf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( mnot
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i] :
          ~ ( Z0 @ Z1 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mnot]) ).

thf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( mor
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ( ( Z0 @ Z2 )
          | ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mor]) ).

thf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( mimplies
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
          | ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mimplies]) ).

thf(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X48: $i,X47: $i] :
      ( ~ ( peter @ X48 @ X47 )
      | ! [X46: $i] :
          ( ~ ( john @ X47 @ X46 )
          | ( place @ X46 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[ax_b,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).

thf(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X22: $i] : ( peter @ X22 @ X22 ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[refl_peter,c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( mand
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ~ ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
            | ~ ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]) ).

thf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( mimplies
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
          | ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_17]),c_0_18]) ).

thf(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X45: $i,X44: $i] :
      ( ~ ( peter @ X45 @ X44 )
      | ( time @ X44 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[ax_a,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).

thf(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X85: $i,X86: $i,X87: $i] :
      ( ~ ( peter @ X85 @ X86 )
      | ~ ( john @ X86 @ X87 )
      | ( place @ X87 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])])]) ).

thf(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X61: $i] : ( peter @ X61 @ X61 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

thf(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X23: $i] : ( john @ X23 @ X23 ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[refl_john,c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_28,plain,
    ! [X55: $i,X54: $i] :
      ( ~ ( peter @ X55 @ X54 )
      | ! [X53: $i] :
          ( ~ ( john @ X54 @ X53 )
          | ~ ~ ( ~ ( place @ X53 )
                | ~ ( time @ X53 ) )
          | ( appointment @ X53 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[ax_d,c_0_22]),c_0_23]),c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).

thf(c_0_29,plain,
    ! [X83: $i,X84: $i] :
      ( ~ ( peter @ X83 @ X84 )
      | ( time @ X84 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_24])]) ).

thf(c_0_30,plain,
    ! [X3: $i,X14: $i,X15: $i] :
      ( ( place @ X15 )
      | ~ ( peter @ X3 @ X14 )
      | ~ ( john @ X14 @ X15 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

thf(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X3: $i] : ( peter @ X3 @ X3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

thf(c_0_32,plain,
    ! [X62: $i] : ( john @ X62 @ X62 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

thf(c_0_33,plain,
    ! [X92: $i,X93: $i,X94: $i] :
      ( ~ ( peter @ X92 @ X93 )
      | ~ ( john @ X93 @ X94 )
      | ~ ( place @ X94 )
      | ~ ( time @ X94 )
      | ( appointment @ X94 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_28])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_34,plain,
    ! [X3: $i,X14: $i] :
      ( ( time @ X14 )
      | ~ ( peter @ X3 @ X14 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

thf(c_0_35,plain,
    ! [X14: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( place @ X3 )
      | ~ ( john @ X14 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

thf(c_0_36,plain,
    ! [X3: $i] : ( john @ X3 @ X3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

thf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mvalid @ ( mand @ ( mbox @ peter @ ( mbox @ john @ appointment ) ) @ ( mbox @ john @ ( mbox @ peter @ appointment ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj]) ).

thf(c_0_38,plain,
    ! [X3: $i,X14: $i,X15: $i] :
      ( ( appointment @ X15 )
      | ~ ( peter @ X3 @ X14 )
      | ~ ( john @ X14 @ X15 )
      | ~ ( place @ X15 )
      | ~ ( time @ X15 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).

thf(c_0_39,plain,
    ! [X3: $i] : ( time @ X3 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_31]) ).

thf(c_0_40,plain,
    ! [X3: $i] : ( place @ X3 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

thf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X60: $i] :
        ~ ( ~ ! [X57: $i] :
                ( ~ ( peter @ X60 @ X57 )
                | ! [X56: $i] :
                    ( ~ ( john @ X57 @ X56 )
                    | ( appointment @ X56 ) ) )
          | ~ ! [X59: $i] :
                ( ~ ( john @ X60 @ X59 )
                | ! [X58: $i] :
                    ( ~ ( peter @ X59 @ X58 )
                    | ( appointment @ X58 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_22]),c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).

thf(c_0_42,plain,
    ! [X15: $i,X14: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( appointment @ X3 )
      | ~ ( peter @ X14 @ X15 )
      | ~ ( john @ X15 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_40])]) ).

thf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( john @ esk5_0 @ esk8_0 )
      | ( peter @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0 ) )
    & ( ( peter @ esk8_0 @ esk9_0 )
      | ( peter @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0 ) )
    & ( ~ ( appointment @ esk9_0 )
      | ( peter @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0 ) )
    & ( ( john @ esk5_0 @ esk8_0 )
      | ( john @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 ) )
    & ( ( peter @ esk8_0 @ esk9_0 )
      | ( john @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 ) )
    & ( ~ ( appointment @ esk9_0 )
      | ( john @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0 ) )
    & ( ( john @ esk5_0 @ esk8_0 )
      | ~ ( appointment @ esk7_0 ) )
    & ( ( peter @ esk8_0 @ esk9_0 )
      | ~ ( appointment @ esk7_0 ) )
    & ( ~ ( appointment @ esk9_0 )
      | ~ ( appointment @ esk7_0 ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_41])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_44,plain,
    ! [X14: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( appointment @ X3 )
      | ~ ( john @ X14 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_31]) ).

thf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ( appointment @ esk9_0 )
    | ~ ( appointment @ esk7_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43]) ).

thf(c_0_46,plain,
    ! [X3: $i] : ( appointment @ X3 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_36]) ).

thf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]),c_0_46])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : PUZ086^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.19  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.20  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:19:55 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.20  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.24  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.26  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Uas1FLfO5p/E---3.1_3343729.p
% 0.23/0.28  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.23/0.28  % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHSN.
% 0.23/0.28  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.28  % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.28  % Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.28  % Starting almost_fo_3_lam with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.28  % Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.28  % ehoh_best2_full_lfho with pid 3343743 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.28  % Result found by ehoh_best2_full_lfho
% 0.23/0.28  % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHSN.
% 0.23/0.28  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.28  % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.28  % Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.28  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.23/0.28  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.28  % Search class: HGHNS-FFMS22-SHSSMSBN
% 0.23/0.28  % partial match(3): HGHNF-FFMF21-SHSSMSBN
% 0.23/0.28  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.28  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.28  % SubtermCWHack with pid 3343748 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.28  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.23/0.28  % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHSN.
% 0.23/0.28  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.28  % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.28  % Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.28  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.23/0.28  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.28  % Search class: HGHNS-FFMS22-SHSSMSBN
% 0.23/0.28  % partial match(3): HGHNF-FFMF21-SHSSMSBN
% 0.23/0.28  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.28  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.28  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.23/0.28  
% 0.23/0.28  % Proof found!
% 0.23/0.28  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/0.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.28  % Parsed axioms                        : 82
% 0.23/0.28  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % Initial clauses                      : 63
% 0.23/0.28  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 38
% 0.23/0.28  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 25
% 0.23/0.28  % Processed clauses                    : 24
% 0.23/0.28  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % ...remaining for further processing  : 24
% 0.23/0.28  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.23/0.28  % Backward-rewritten                   : 8
% 0.23/0.28  % Generated clauses                    : 23
% 0.23/0.28  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 21
% 0.23/0.28  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % Paramodulations                      : 23
% 0.23/0.28  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % Total rewrite steps                  : 12
% 0.23/0.28  % ...of those cached                   : 5
% 0.23/0.28  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.23/0.28  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.23/0.28  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.28  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.23/0.28  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.28  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.23/0.28  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.23/0.28  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.23/0.28  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.23/0.28  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.23/0.28  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.23/0.28  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.23/0.28  % Current number of processed clauses  : 14
% 0.23/0.28  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 6
% 0.23/0.28  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.28  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.23/0.28  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 8
% 0.23/0.28  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 15
% 0.23/0.28  % ...number of literals in the above   : 46
% 0.23/0.28  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % Current number of archived clauses   : 10
% 0.23/0.28  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10
% 0.23/0.28  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 0.23/0.28  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 0.23/0.28  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16
% 0.23/0.28  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 5
% 0.23/0.28  % BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 0.23/0.28  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/0.28  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 4822
% 0.23/0.28  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1455
% 0.23/0.28  
% 0.23/0.28  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.28  % User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.23/0.28  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.23/0.28  % Total time               : 0.012 s
% 0.23/0.28  % Maximum resident set size: 3960 pages
% 0.23/0.28  
% 0.23/0.28  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.28  % User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.23/0.28  % System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.23/0.28  % Total time               : 0.019 s
% 0.23/0.28  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.23/0.28  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------