↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : PUZ090^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:20:46 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.36s 1.19s
% Output   : Refutation 2.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   5 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  141 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   31 (   9 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  179 (  53   ~;  24   |;  63   &;   0   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  39  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   15 (  13 usr;  15 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   ^;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(cOPEN_WINDOW_decl,type,
    cOPEN_WINDOW: $o ).

thf(cEAST_decl,type,
    cEAST: $o ).

thf(cRHEUMATIC_decl,type,
    cRHEUMATIC: $o ).

thf(cFOGGY_decl,type,
    cFOGGY: $o ).

thf(cOPEN_DOOR_decl,type,
    cOPEN_DOOR: $o ).

thf(cFLUTE_decl,type,
    cFLUTE: $o ).

thf(cSUNSHINE_decl,type,
    cSUNSHINE: $o ).

thf(cFIRE_decl,type,
    cFIRE: $o ).

thf(cGUSTY_decl,type,
    cGUSTY: $o ).

thf(cHEADACHE_decl,type,
    cHEADACHE: $o ).

thf(cSMOKES_decl,type,
    cSMOKES: $o ).

thf(cCOLD_decl,type,
    cCOLD: $o ).

thf(cSMOKE_decl,type,
    cSMOKE: $o ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( ( ( cEAST
       => cSUNSHINE )
      & ( ( cCOLD
          & cFOGGY )
       => cFLUTE )
      & ( ( cFIRE
          & cSMOKE )
       => cOPEN_DOOR )
      & ( ( cCOLD
          & cRHEUMATIC )
       => cFIRE )
      & ( ( cEAST
          & cGUSTY )
       => cSMOKES )
      & ( cOPEN_DOOR
       => ~ cHEADACHE )
      & ( cFOGGY
       => ~ cOPEN_WINDOW )
      & ( ( ~ cGUSTY
          & cFIRE
          & ~ cOPEN_DOOR )
       => ~ cRHEUMATIC )
      & ( cSUNSHINE
       => cFOGGY )
      & ( cFLUTE
       => ~ cOPEN_DOOR )
      & ( ( cFOGGY
          & cEAST )
       => cRHEUMATIC ) )
   => ( cEAST
     => ~ cOPEN_WINDOW ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM210) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ( cEAST
         => cSUNSHINE )
        & ( ( cCOLD
            & cFOGGY )
         => cFLUTE )
        & ( ( cFIRE
            & cSMOKE )
         => cOPEN_DOOR )
        & ( ( cCOLD
            & cRHEUMATIC )
         => cFIRE )
        & ( ( cEAST
            & cGUSTY )
         => cSMOKES )
        & ( cOPEN_DOOR
         => ~ cHEADACHE )
        & ( cFOGGY
         => ~ cOPEN_WINDOW )
        & ( ( ~ cGUSTY
            & cFIRE
            & ~ cOPEN_DOOR )
         => ~ cRHEUMATIC )
        & ( cSUNSHINE
         => cFOGGY )
        & ( cFLUTE
         => ~ cOPEN_DOOR )
        & ( ( cFOGGY
            & cEAST )
         => cRHEUMATIC ) )
     => ( cEAST
       => ~ cOPEN_WINDOW ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ( ( ( cEAST
         => cSUNSHINE )
        & ( ( cCOLD
            & cFOGGY )
         => cFLUTE )
        & ( ( cFIRE
            & cSMOKE )
         => cOPEN_DOOR )
        & ( ( cCOLD
            & cRHEUMATIC )
         => cFIRE )
        & ( ( cEAST
            & cGUSTY )
         => cSMOKES )
        & ( cOPEN_DOOR
         => ~ cHEADACHE )
        & ( cFOGGY
         => ~ cOPEN_WINDOW )
        & ( ( ~ cGUSTY
            & cFIRE
            & ~ cOPEN_DOOR )
         => ~ cRHEUMATIC )
        & ( cSUNSHINE
         => cFOGGY )
        & ( cFLUTE
         => ~ cOPEN_DOOR )
        & ( ( cFOGGY
            & cEAST )
         => cRHEUMATIC ) )
     => ( cEAST
       => ~ cOPEN_WINDOW ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ( ( ~ cEAST
      | cSUNSHINE )
    & ( ~ cCOLD
      | ~ cFOGGY
      | cFLUTE )
    & ( ~ cFIRE
      | ~ cSMOKE
      | cOPEN_DOOR )
    & ( ~ cCOLD
      | ~ cRHEUMATIC
      | cFIRE )
    & ( ~ cEAST
      | ~ cGUSTY
      | cSMOKES )
    & ( ~ cOPEN_DOOR
      | ~ cHEADACHE )
    & ( ~ cFOGGY
      | ~ cOPEN_WINDOW )
    & ( cGUSTY
      | ~ cFIRE
      | cOPEN_DOOR
      | ~ cRHEUMATIC )
    & ( ~ cSUNSHINE
      | cFOGGY )
    & ( ~ cFLUTE
      | ~ cOPEN_DOOR )
    & ( ~ cFOGGY
      | ~ cEAST
      | cRHEUMATIC )
    & cEAST
    & cOPEN_WINDOW ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ( ~ cEAST
    | cSUNSHINE ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ( ~ cSUNSHINE
    | cFOGGY ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ( ~ cFOGGY
    | ~ cOPEN_WINDOW ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    cOPEN_WINDOW,
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ( ~ cFOGGY
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[7,12]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ~ cFOGGY,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ( ~ cSUNSHINE
    | $false ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[10,19]) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ~ cSUNSHINE,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[22]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    cEAST,
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ( ~ $true
    | $false ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[16,23,14]) ).

thf(25,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[24]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : PUZ090^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.22  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.22  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.22  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.22  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.22  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.22  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.22  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.22  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:17:37 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.22  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.22  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.69/0.54  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.02/0.65  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (99ms). 
% 1.02/0.65  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.37/0.85  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.37/0.85  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.64/0.90  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.64/0.92  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.64/0.92  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 1.64/0.92  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.64/0.93  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 2.36/1.19  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 2.36/1.19  % Time passed: 879ms (effective reasoning time: 530ms)
% 2.36/1.19  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 2.36/1.19  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 2.36/1.19  % No. of inferences in proof: 15
% 2.36/1.19  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 879 ms resp. 530 ms w/o parsing
% 2.59/1.21  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.59/1.21  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------