↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : PUZ102^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:20:53 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.28s
% Output   : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   57 (  25 unt;   0 typ;   7 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  258 (  54 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  323 (  33   ~;  42   |;  12   &; 188   @)
%                                         (   4 <=>;  26  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   17 (  17   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   24 (  20 usr;  11 con; 0-4 aty)
%                                         (  18  !!;   0  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   50 (   0 sgn  13   !;   1   ?;  50   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    s: $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    cCKB_E2: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    vPI: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    vIMP: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    vAND: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    db1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    db2: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_15,type,
    sF3: $o ).

thf(func_def_16,type,
    sK4: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_17,type,
    sK5: ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ! [X2: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ( X2 @ X0 )
            & ! [X3: $i] :
                ( ( X2 @ X3 )
               => ( X2 @ ( s @ ( s @ X3 ) ) ) ) )
         => ( X2 @ X1 ) ) )
    = cCKB_E2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cCKB_E2_def) ).

thf(f2,conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : ( cCKB_E2 @ X0 @ ( s @ ( s @ X0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cCKB_L33000) ).

thf(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: $i] : ( cCKB_E2 @ X0 @ ( s @ ( s @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f2]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i] : ( cCKB_E2 @ X0 @ ( s @ ( s @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i] :
        ( ( cCKB_E2 @ X0 @ ( s @ ( s @ X0 ) ) )
        = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ! [X2: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ( X2 @ X0 )
            & ! [X3: $i] :
                ( ( X2 @ X3 )
               => ( X2 @ ( s @ ( s @ X3 ) ) ) ) )
         => ( X2 @ X1 ) ) )
    = cCKB_E2 ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( cCKB_E2
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
              ( ( ( !! @ $i
                  @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
                      ( ( Y2 @ Y3 )
                     => ( Y2 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y3 ) ) ) ) )
                & ( Y2 @ Y0 ) )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ? [X0: $i] :
      ( ( cCKB_E2 @ X0 @ ( s @ ( s @ X0 ) ) )
     != $true ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ( cCKB_E2 @ sK0 @ ( s @ ( s @ sK0 ) ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X0,sK0)],[f8]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( cCKB_E2 @ sK0 @ ( s @ ( s @ sK0 ) ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( cCKB_E2
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
              ( ( ( !! @ $i
                  @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
                      ( ( Y2 @ Y3 )
                     => ( Y2 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y3 ) ) ) ) )
                & ( Y2 @ Y0 ) )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
              ( ( ( !! @ $i
                  @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
                      ( ( Y2 @ Y3 )
                     => ( Y2 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y3 ) ) ) ) )
                & ( Y2 @ Y0 ) )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) )
      @ sK0
      @ ( s @ ( s @ sK0 ) ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f10,f11]) ).

thf(f15,definition,
    ( sF1
    = ( s @ sK0 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sF1])],[function_definition]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( s @ sK0 )
    = sF1 ),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f17,definition,
    ( sF2
    = ( s @ sF1 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sF2])],[function_definition]) ).

thf(f18,definition,
    ( sF3
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
              ( ( ( !! @ $i
                  @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
                      ( ( Y2 @ Y3 )
                     => ( Y2 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y3 ) ) ) ) )
                & ( Y2 @ Y0 ) )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) )
      @ sK0
      @ sF2 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sF3])],[function_definition]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
          ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
              ( ( ( !! @ $i
                  @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
                      ( ( Y2 @ Y3 )
                     => ( Y2 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y3 ) ) ) ) )
                & ( Y2 @ Y0 ) )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) )
      @ sK0
      @ sF2 )
    = sF3 ),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f18]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    $true != sF3,
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f14,f19,f17,f16]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( ( $true = sF3 )
    | ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
            ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
            @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
                ( ( ( !! @ $i
                    @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
                        ( ( Y2 @ Y3 )
                       => ( Y2 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y3 ) ) ) ) )
                  & ( Y2 @ Y0 ) )
               => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) )
        @ sK0
        @ sF2 ) ) ),
    inference(iff_proxy_clausification,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
        @ ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
            ( ( ( !! @ $i
                @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                    ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
                   => ( Y0 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y1 ) ) ) ) )
              & ( Y0 @ sK0 ) )
           => ( Y0 @ sF2 ) ) ) )
    | ( $true = sF3 ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( ( $true = sF3 )
    | ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
            ( ( ( !! @ $i
                @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                    ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
                   => ( Y0 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y1 ) ) ) ) )
              & ( Y0 @ sK0 ) )
           => ( Y0 @ sF2 ) )
        @ sK4 ) ) ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ( ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
                ( ( sK4 @ Y0 )
               => ( sK4 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
          & ( sK4 @ sK0 ) )
       => ( sK4 @ sF2 ) ) )
    | ( $true = sF3 ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f24]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( ( $true = sF3 )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK4 @ sF2 ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( ( $true = sF3 )
    | ( $true
      = ( ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ( ( sK4 @ Y0 )
             => ( sK4 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
        & ( sK4 @ sK0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( ( $true = sF3 )
    | ( ( sK4 @ sK0 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f27]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( ( $true = sF3 )
    | ( ( !! @ $i
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( sK4 @ Y0 )
           => ( sK4 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f27]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ( ( sK4 @ Y0 )
             => ( sK4 @ ( s @ ( s @ Y0 ) ) ) )
          @ X1 )
        = $true )
      | ( $true = sF3 ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f29]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( ( sK4 @ X1 )
         => ( sK4 @ ( s @ ( s @ X1 ) ) ) ) )
      | ( $true = sF3 ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f30]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( sK4 @ X1 )
        = $false )
      | ( $true = sF3 )
      | ( ( sK4 @ ( s @ ( s @ X1 ) ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f31]) ).

thf(f43,definition,
    ( spl6_1
  <=> ! [X1: $i] :
        ( ( ( sK4 @ X1 )
          = $false )
        | ( ( sK4 @ ( s @ ( s @ X1 ) ) )
          = $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl6_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ( ! [X1: $i] :
        ( ( ( sK4 @ ( s @ ( s @ X1 ) ) )
          = $true )
        | ( ( sK4 @ X1 )
          = $false ) )
    | ~ spl6_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f43]) ).

thf(f46,definition,
    ( spl6_2
  <=> ( $true = sF3 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl6_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f49,plain,
    ( spl6_1
    | spl6_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f32,f46,f43]) ).

thf(f51,definition,
    ( spl6_3
  <=> ( ( sK4 @ sK0 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl6_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f53,plain,
    ( ( ( sK4 @ sK0 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl6_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f51]) ).

thf(f54,plain,
    ( spl6_3
    | spl6_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f28,f46,f51]) ).

thf(f56,definition,
    ( spl6_4
  <=> ( $false
      = ( sK4 @ sF2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl6_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f58,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK4 @ sF2 ) )
    | ~ spl6_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f56]) ).

thf(f59,plain,
    ( spl6_2
    | spl6_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f26,f56,f46]) ).

thf(f72,plain,
    ~ spl6_2,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f20,f46]) ).

thf(f85,plain,
    ( ( ( sK4 @ sK0 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK4 @ ( s @ sF1 ) )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl6_1 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f44,f16]) ).

thf(f87,plain,
    ( ( ( sK4 @ ( s @ sF1 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl6_1
    | ~ spl6_3 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f85,f53]) ).

thf(f88,plain,
    ( ( ( sK4 @ ( s @ sF1 ) )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl6_1
    | ~ spl6_3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f87]) ).

thf(f98,plain,
    ( ( ( sK4 @ sF2 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl6_1
    | ~ spl6_3 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f88,f17]) ).

thf(f99,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl6_1
    | ~ spl6_3
    | ~ spl6_4 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f98,f58]) ).

thf(f100,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl6_1
    | ~ spl6_3
    | ~ spl6_4 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f99]) ).

thf(f101,plain,
    ( ~ spl6_1
    | ~ spl6_3
    | ~ spl6_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f100]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( spl6_1
    | spl6_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f49]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ( spl6_2
    | spl6_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f54]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    ( spl6_2
    | spl6_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f59]) ).

cnf(s6,plain,
    ~ spl6_2,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f72]) ).

cnf(s8,plain,
    ( ~ spl6_1
    | ~ spl6_3
    | ~ spl6_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f101]) ).

cnf(s9,plain,
    spl6_4,
    inference(rat,[],[s3,s6]) ).

cnf(s10,plain,
    spl6_3,
    inference(rat,[],[s2,s6]) ).

cnf(s11,plain,
    ~ spl6_1,
    inference(rat,[],[s8,s9,s10]) ).

cnf(s12,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s6,s11]) ).

thf(f102,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s12]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : PUZ102^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.20  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.20  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.20  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.20  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.20  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.20  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:24:07 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.20  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.23  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.25  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.28  % (1267016)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.22/0.28  % (1267027)WARNING Broken Constraint: if ho_split_queue_ratios(1,8) has been set then ho_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.22/0.28  % (1267027)WARNING Broken Constraint: if sine_to_age_tolerance(5) has been set then sine_to_age(off) is equal to on or sine_to_pred_levels(off) is not equal to off or sine_level_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.22/0.28  % (1267027)dis+1002_8_to=kbo:sil=128000:tgt=full:drc=off:si=on:sp=const_max:lma=off:spb=non_intro:cbe=off:uwa=interpreted_only:random_seed=3102780277:hsqr=1,8:i=157:s2at=5:add=on:nm=2:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/157Mi)
% 0.22/0.28  % (1267027) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-1267016-1267027"...
% 0.22/0.28  % (1267027)...printing done.
% 0.22/0.28  % (1267027)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.22/0.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.28  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.28  % (1267027)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.28  % (1267027)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.22/0.28  % (1267027)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.22/0.28  % (1267027)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.22/0.28  % (1267027)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.22/0.28  % (1267027)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.28  % (1267027)Peak memory usage: 13 MB
% 0.22/0.28  % (1267027)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.22/0.28  % (1267016)Success in time 0.028 s
% 0.22/0.28  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------