%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Nitpick---2016 % Problem : PUZ119^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Bugfixed v5.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % Computer : n141.star.cs.uiowa.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz % Memory : 32218.75MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Wed Jan 18 11:51:26 EST 2017 % Result : CounterSatisfiable 23.30s % Output : FiniteModel 23.30s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.03 % Problem : PUZ119^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Bugfixed v5.2.0. % 0.00/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % 0.03/0.23 % Computer : n141.star.cs.uiowa.edu % 0.03/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.03/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz % 0.03/0.23 % Memory : 32218.75MB % 0.03/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % 0.03/0.23 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.03/0.23 % DateTime : Sat Jan 14 23:43:49 CST 2017 % 0.03/0.23 % CPUTime : % 23.30/13.85 Nitpicking formula... % 23.30/13.85 Timestamp: 23:43:58 % 23.30/13.85 The type TPTP_Interpret.ind passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be % 23.30/13.85 able to skip some scopes % 23.30/13.85 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured: % 23.30/13.85 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light" % 23.30/13.85 Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes: % 23.30/13.85 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1 % 23.30/13.85 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2 % 23.30/13.85 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3 % 23.30/13.85 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4 % 23.30/13.85 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5 % 23.30/13.85 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel % 23.30/13.85 Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2: % 23.30/13.85 % 23.30/13.85 Skolem constants: % 23.30/13.85 Xx = i1 % 23.30/13.85 Xy = i2 % 23.30/13.85 Constants: % 23.30/13.85 bnd_c1 = i2 % 23.30/13.85 bnd_s = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1) % 23.30/13.85 % SZS output end FiniteModel % 23.30/13.85 Total time: 2.6 s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------