%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Nitpick---2016 % Problem : PUZ121^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Bugfixed v6.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % Computer : n086.star.cs.uiowa.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz % Memory : 32218.75MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Wed Jan 18 11:51:26 EST 2017 % Result : CounterSatisfiable 23.80s % Output : FiniteModel 23.80s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.03 % Problem : PUZ121^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Bugfixed v6.2.0. % 0.00/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % 0.03/0.23 % Computer : n086.star.cs.uiowa.edu % 0.03/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.03/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz % 0.03/0.23 % Memory : 32218.75MB % 0.03/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % 0.03/0.23 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.03/0.23 % DateTime : Sat Jan 14 23:44:48 CST 2017 % 0.03/0.24 % CPUTime : % 23.80/12.59 Nitpicking formula... % 23.80/12.59 Timestamp: 23:44:57 % 23.80/12.59 The type TPTP_Interpret.ind passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be % 23.80/12.59 able to skip some scopes % 23.80/12.59 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured: % 23.80/12.59 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light" % 23.80/12.59 Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes: % 23.80/12.59 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1 % 23.80/12.59 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2 % 23.80/12.59 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3 % 23.80/12.59 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4 % 23.80/12.59 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5 % 23.80/12.59 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel % 23.80/12.59 Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5: % 23.80/12.59 % 23.80/12.59 Skolem constants: % 23.80/12.59 Xu = i1 % 23.80/12.59 Xv = i2 % 23.80/12.59 Constants: % 23.80/12.59 bnd_c1 = i3 % 23.80/12.59 bnd_s = % 23.80/12.59 (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i5, i3 := i4, i4 := i1, i5 := i3) % 23.80/12.59 % SZS output end FiniteModel % 23.80/12.59 Total time: 2.5 s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------