↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : PUZ129+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:31:39 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.27s 1.50s
% Output   : Refutation 5.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   21
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  308 (  71 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   36 (   7 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  428 ( 159   ~; 131   |; 116   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  22  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;   8 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  140 (  96   !;  44   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,conjecture,
    ( ( ! [X0] :
          ( ( person(X0)
            & property1(X0,honest,pos)
            & property1(X0,industrious,pos) )
         => ? [X1] :
              ( property1(X1,healthy,pos)
              & X0 = X1 ) )
      & ! [X2] :
          ( grocer(X2)
         => ~ ? [X3] :
                ( property1(X3,healthy,pos)
                & X2 = X3 ) )
      & ! [X4] :
          ( ( grocer(X4)
            & property1(X4,industrious,pos) )
         => ? [X5] :
              ( property1(X5,honest,pos)
              & X4 = X5 ) )
      & ! [X6] :
          ( cyclist(X6)
         => ? [X7] :
              ( property1(X7,industrious,pos)
              & X6 = X7 ) )
      & ! [X8] :
          ( ( cyclist(X8)
            & property1(X8,unhealthy,pos) )
         => ? [X9] :
              ( property1(X9,dishonest,pos)
              & X8 = X9 ) )
      & ! [X10] :
          ( ( person(X10)
            & property1(X10,healthy,pos) )
         => ~ ? [X11] :
                ( property1(X11,unhealthy,pos)
                & X10 = X11 ) )
      & ! [X12] :
          ( ( person(X12)
            & property1(X12,honest,pos) )
         => ~ ? [X13] :
                ( property1(X13,dishonest,pos)
                & X12 = X13 ) )
      & ! [X14] :
          ( grocer(X14)
         => ? [X15] :
              ( person(X15)
              & X14 = X15 ) )
      & ! [X16] :
          ( cyclist(X16)
         => ? [X17] :
              ( person(X17)
              & X16 = X17 ) ) )
   => ! [X18] :
        ( grocer(X18)
       => ~ ? [X19] :
              ( cyclist(X19)
              & X18 = X19 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ! [X0] :
            ( ( person(X0)
              & property1(X0,honest,pos)
              & property1(X0,industrious,pos) )
           => ? [X1] :
                ( property1(X1,healthy,pos)
                & X0 = X1 ) )
        & ! [X2] :
            ( grocer(X2)
           => ~ ? [X3] :
                  ( property1(X3,healthy,pos)
                  & X2 = X3 ) )
        & ! [X4] :
            ( ( grocer(X4)
              & property1(X4,industrious,pos) )
           => ? [X5] :
                ( property1(X5,honest,pos)
                & X4 = X5 ) )
        & ! [X6] :
            ( cyclist(X6)
           => ? [X7] :
                ( property1(X7,industrious,pos)
                & X6 = X7 ) )
        & ! [X8] :
            ( ( cyclist(X8)
              & property1(X8,unhealthy,pos) )
           => ? [X9] :
                ( property1(X9,dishonest,pos)
                & X8 = X9 ) )
        & ! [X10] :
            ( ( person(X10)
              & property1(X10,healthy,pos) )
           => ~ ? [X11] :
                  ( property1(X11,unhealthy,pos)
                  & X10 = X11 ) )
        & ! [X12] :
            ( ( person(X12)
              & property1(X12,honest,pos) )
           => ~ ? [X13] :
                  ( property1(X13,dishonest,pos)
                  & X12 = X13 ) )
        & ! [X14] :
            ( grocer(X14)
           => ? [X15] :
                ( person(X15)
                & X14 = X15 ) )
        & ! [X16] :
            ( cyclist(X16)
           => ? [X17] :
                ( person(X17)
                & X16 = X17 ) ) )
     => ! [X18] :
          ( grocer(X18)
         => ~ ? [X19] :
                ( cyclist(X19)
                & X18 = X19 ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ( ? [X18] :
        ( ? [X19] :
            ( cyclist(X19)
            & X18 = X19 )
        & grocer(X18) )
    & ! [X0] :
        ( ? [X1] :
            ( property1(X1,healthy,pos)
            & X0 = X1 )
        | ~ person(X0)
        | ~ property1(X0,honest,pos)
        | ~ property1(X0,industrious,pos) )
    & ! [X2] :
        ( ! [X3] :
            ( ~ property1(X3,healthy,pos)
            | X2 != X3 )
        | ~ grocer(X2) )
    & ! [X4] :
        ( ? [X5] :
            ( property1(X5,honest,pos)
            & X4 = X5 )
        | ~ grocer(X4)
        | ~ property1(X4,industrious,pos) )
    & ! [X6] :
        ( ? [X7] :
            ( property1(X7,industrious,pos)
            & X6 = X7 )
        | ~ cyclist(X6) )
    & ! [X8] :
        ( ? [X9] :
            ( property1(X9,dishonest,pos)
            & X8 = X9 )
        | ~ cyclist(X8)
        | ~ property1(X8,unhealthy,pos) )
    & ! [X10] :
        ( ! [X11] :
            ( ~ property1(X11,unhealthy,pos)
            | X10 != X11 )
        | ~ person(X10)
        | ~ property1(X10,healthy,pos) )
    & ! [X12] :
        ( ! [X13] :
            ( ~ property1(X13,dishonest,pos)
            | X12 != X13 )
        | ~ person(X12)
        | ~ property1(X12,honest,pos) )
    & ! [X14] :
        ( ? [X15] :
            ( person(X15)
            & X14 = X15 )
        | ~ grocer(X14) )
    & ! [X16] :
        ( ? [X17] :
            ( person(X17)
            & X16 = X17 )
        | ~ cyclist(X16) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ( ? [X18] :
        ( ? [X19] :
            ( cyclist(X19)
            & X18 = X19 )
        & grocer(X18) )
    & ! [X0] :
        ( ? [X1] :
            ( property1(X1,healthy,pos)
            & X0 = X1 )
        | ~ person(X0)
        | ~ property1(X0,honest,pos)
        | ~ property1(X0,industrious,pos) )
    & ! [X2] :
        ( ! [X3] :
            ( ~ property1(X3,healthy,pos)
            | X2 != X3 )
        | ~ grocer(X2) )
    & ! [X4] :
        ( ? [X5] :
            ( property1(X5,honest,pos)
            & X4 = X5 )
        | ~ grocer(X4)
        | ~ property1(X4,industrious,pos) )
    & ! [X6] :
        ( ? [X7] :
            ( property1(X7,industrious,pos)
            & X6 = X7 )
        | ~ cyclist(X6) )
    & ! [X8] :
        ( ? [X9] :
            ( property1(X9,dishonest,pos)
            & X8 = X9 )
        | ~ cyclist(X8)
        | ~ property1(X8,unhealthy,pos) )
    & ! [X10] :
        ( ! [X11] :
            ( ~ property1(X11,unhealthy,pos)
            | X10 != X11 )
        | ~ person(X10)
        | ~ property1(X10,healthy,pos) )
    & ! [X12] :
        ( ! [X13] :
            ( ~ property1(X13,dishonest,pos)
            | X12 != X13 )
        | ~ person(X12)
        | ~ property1(X12,honest,pos) )
    & ! [X14] :
        ( ? [X15] :
            ( person(X15)
            & X14 = X15 )
        | ~ grocer(X14) )
    & ! [X16] :
        ( ? [X17] :
            ( person(X17)
            & X16 = X17 )
        | ~ cyclist(X16) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ? [X1] :
            ( cyclist(X1)
            & X0 = X1 )
        & grocer(X0) )
    & ! [X2] :
        ( ? [X3] :
            ( property1(X3,healthy,pos)
            & X2 = X3 )
        | ~ person(X2)
        | ~ property1(X2,honest,pos)
        | ~ property1(X2,industrious,pos) )
    & ! [X4] :
        ( ! [X5] :
            ( ~ property1(X5,healthy,pos)
            | X4 != X5 )
        | ~ grocer(X4) )
    & ! [X6] :
        ( ? [X7] :
            ( property1(X7,honest,pos)
            & X6 = X7 )
        | ~ grocer(X6)
        | ~ property1(X6,industrious,pos) )
    & ! [X8] :
        ( ? [X9] :
            ( property1(X9,industrious,pos)
            & X8 = X9 )
        | ~ cyclist(X8) )
    & ! [X10] :
        ( ? [X11] :
            ( property1(X11,dishonest,pos)
            & X10 = X11 )
        | ~ cyclist(X10)
        | ~ property1(X10,unhealthy,pos) )
    & ! [X12] :
        ( ! [X13] :
            ( ~ property1(X13,unhealthy,pos)
            | X12 != X13 )
        | ~ person(X12)
        | ~ property1(X12,healthy,pos) )
    & ! [X14] :
        ( ! [X15] :
            ( ~ property1(X15,dishonest,pos)
            | X14 != X15 )
        | ~ person(X14)
        | ~ property1(X14,honest,pos) )
    & ! [X16] :
        ( ? [X17] :
            ( person(X17)
            & X16 = X17 )
        | ~ grocer(X16) )
    & ! [X18] :
        ( ? [X19] :
            ( person(X19)
            & X18 = X19 )
        | ~ cyclist(X18) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ( cyclist(sK1)
    & sK0 = sK1
    & grocer(sK0)
    & ! [X2] :
        ( ( property1(sK2(X2),healthy,pos)
          & sK2(X2) = X2 )
        | ~ person(X2)
        | ~ property1(X2,honest,pos)
        | ~ property1(X2,industrious,pos) )
    & ! [X4] :
        ( ! [X5] :
            ( ~ property1(X5,healthy,pos)
            | X4 != X5 )
        | ~ grocer(X4) )
    & ! [X6] :
        ( ( property1(sK3(X6),honest,pos)
          & sK3(X6) = X6 )
        | ~ grocer(X6)
        | ~ property1(X6,industrious,pos) )
    & ! [X8] :
        ( ( property1(sK4(X8),industrious,pos)
          & sK4(X8) = X8 )
        | ~ cyclist(X8) )
    & ! [X10] :
        ( ( property1(sK5(X10),dishonest,pos)
          & sK5(X10) = X10 )
        | ~ cyclist(X10)
        | ~ property1(X10,unhealthy,pos) )
    & ! [X12] :
        ( ! [X13] :
            ( ~ property1(X13,unhealthy,pos)
            | X12 != X13 )
        | ~ person(X12)
        | ~ property1(X12,healthy,pos) )
    & ! [X14] :
        ( ! [X15] :
            ( ~ property1(X15,dishonest,pos)
            | X14 != X15 )
        | ~ person(X14)
        | ~ property1(X14,honest,pos) )
    & ! [X16] :
        ( ( person(sK6(X16))
          & sK6(X16) = X16 )
        | ~ grocer(X16) )
    & ! [X18] :
        ( ( person(sK7(X18))
          & sK7(X18) = X18 )
        | ~ cyclist(X18) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4,sK5,sK6,sK7]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X3,sK2(X2)),skolemize(X7,sK3(X6)),skolemize(X9,sK4(X8)),skolemize(X11,sK5(X10)),skolemize(X17,sK6(X16)),skolemize(X19,sK7(X18))],[f5]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ! [X18] :
      ( sK7(X18) = X18
      | ~ cyclist(X18) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ! [X18] :
      ( person(sK7(X18))
      | ~ cyclist(X18) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ! [X8] :
      ( sK4(X8) = X8
      | ~ cyclist(X8) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X8] :
      ( property1(sK4(X8),industrious,pos)
      | ~ cyclist(X8) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ! [X6] :
      ( ~ property1(X6,industrious,pos)
      | ~ grocer(X6)
      | sK3(X6) = X6 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ! [X6] :
      ( property1(sK3(X6),honest,pos)
      | ~ grocer(X6)
      | ~ property1(X6,industrious,pos) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( ~ property1(X5,healthy,pos)
      | X4 != X5
      | ~ grocer(X4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ property1(X2,industrious,pos)
      | ~ person(X2)
      | ~ property1(X2,honest,pos)
      | sK2(X2) = X2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( property1(sK2(X2),healthy,pos)
      | ~ person(X2)
      | ~ property1(X2,honest,pos)
      | ~ property1(X2,industrious,pos) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    grocer(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    sK0 = sK1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    cyclist(sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    grocer(sK1),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f22,f23]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ! [X5] :
      ( ~ property1(X5,healthy,pos)
      | ~ grocer(X5) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( person(X0)
      | ~ cyclist(X0)
      | ~ cyclist(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f8,f7]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( person(X0)
      | ~ cyclist(X0) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( property1(X0,industrious,pos)
      | ~ cyclist(X0)
      | ~ cyclist(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f16,f15]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( property1(X0,industrious,pos)
      | ~ cyclist(X0) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( sK3(X0) = X0
      | ~ grocer(X0)
      | ~ cyclist(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f17,f34]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( property1(X0,honest,pos)
      | ~ grocer(X0)
      | ~ property1(X0,industrious,pos)
      | ~ grocer(X0)
      | ~ cyclist(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f18,f36]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( property1(X0,honest,pos)
      | ~ grocer(X0)
      | ~ property1(X0,industrious,pos)
      | ~ cyclist(X0) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( property1(X0,honest,pos)
      | ~ grocer(X0)
      | ~ cyclist(X0) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f39,f34]) ).

fof(f47,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ person(X0)
      | ~ property1(X0,honest,pos)
      | sK2(X0) = X0
      | ~ cyclist(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f20,f34]) ).

fof(f48,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ property1(X0,honest,pos)
      | sK2(X0) = X0
      | ~ cyclist(X0) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f47,f30]) ).

fof(f53,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( sK2(X0) = X0
      | ~ cyclist(X0)
      | ~ grocer(X0)
      | ~ cyclist(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f48,f40]) ).

fof(f55,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( sK2(X0) = X0
      | ~ cyclist(X0)
      | ~ grocer(X0) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f53]) ).

fof(f56,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( property1(X0,healthy,pos)
      | ~ person(X0)
      | ~ property1(X0,honest,pos)
      | ~ property1(X0,industrious,pos)
      | ~ cyclist(X0)
      | ~ grocer(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f21,f55]) ).

fof(f57,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ person(X0)
      | ~ property1(X0,honest,pos)
      | ~ property1(X0,industrious,pos)
      | ~ cyclist(X0)
      | ~ grocer(X0) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f56,f26]) ).

fof(f58,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ property1(X0,honest,pos)
      | ~ property1(X0,industrious,pos)
      | ~ cyclist(X0)
      | ~ grocer(X0) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f57,f30]) ).

fof(f59,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ property1(X0,industrious,pos)
      | ~ cyclist(X0)
      | ~ grocer(X0) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f58,f40]) ).

fof(f60,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ cyclist(X0)
      | ~ grocer(X0) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f59,f34]) ).

fof(f64,plain,
    ~ grocer(sK1),
    inference(resolution,[],[f60,f24]) ).

fof(f65,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f64,f25]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : PUZ129+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.42  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.42  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.42  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.42  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.42  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.42  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 22:44:10 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.43  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.27/1.50  % (3400335)Detected formulas, will run a generic FOF schedule.
% 4.27/1.50  % (3400340)lrs+10_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:tgt=full:npcc=on:drc=off:sp=weighted_frequency:spb=goal:fd=preordered:foolp=on:random_seed=1103768962:i=141193_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141193Mi)
% 4.27/1.50  % (3400341)lrs+11_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:lma=off:spb=units:urr=ec_only:bce=on:s2agt=64:updr=off:random_seed=496532708:i=134677:sd=20:aac=none:nm=16:ss=included:sgt=10_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/134677Mi)
% 4.27/1.50  % (3400342)lrs+1010_1_anc=all:sfv=off:to=kbo:ncem=casc2026/models/loop7.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:prc=on:sos=all:bsr=unit_only:sac=on:random_seed=777426044:i=141695:sd=1:nm=32:gsp=on:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141695Mi)
% 4.27/1.50  % (3400344)dis-1010_2:3_sil=16000:sp=reverse_frequency:random_seed=346270765:i=119:av=off:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/119Mi)
% 4.27/1.50  % (3400343)lrs+1010_1_to=lpo:sil=32000:sos=on:spb=goal_then_units:bce=on:random_seed=3091455811:i=109:sd=1:ins=1:gsp=on:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/109Mi)
% 4.27/1.50  % (3400345)dis-1011_1_sil=16000:fde=unused:s2agt=70:random_seed=1413519849:s2a=on:i=139:gtg=position_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/139Mi)
% 4.27/1.50  % (3400346)dis-21_1_sil=8000:lcm=predicate:random_seed=2157378413:st=5:avsq=on:i=129:avsqr=1,16:sd=3:aac=none:ep=RS:fsr=off:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/129Mi)
% 4.27/1.50  % (3400346)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 4.27/1.50  % (3400346)------------------------------
% 4.27/1.50  % (3400346)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 4.27/1.50  % (3400346)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 4.27/1.50  % (3400346)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 4.27/1.50  % (3400346)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 4.27/1.50  % (3400346)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 4.27/1.50  % (3400346)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 4.27/1.50  % (3400346)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 4.27/1.50  % (3400343)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 4.27/1.50  % (3400344)First to succeed.
% 4.27/1.50  % (3400345)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 4.27/1.50  % (3400344)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-3400335"
% 4.27/1.50  % (3400346)------------------------------
% 4.27/1.50  % (3400346)------------------------------
% 4.27/1.50  % (3400344)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 4.27/1.50  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 4.27/1.50  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 5.10/1.64  % (3400344)------------------------------
% 5.10/1.64  % (3400344)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 5.10/1.64  % (3400344)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 5.10/1.64  % (3400344)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 5.10/1.64  % (3400344)Termination reason: Refutation
% 5.10/1.64  % (3400344)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 5.10/1.64  % (3400344)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 5.10/1.64  % (3400344)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 5.10/1.64  % (3400344)------------------------------
% 5.10/1.64  % (3400344)------------------------------
% 5.10/1.64  % (3400335)Success in time 0.633 s
% 5.10/1.64  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------