%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : PUZ129+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:33:00 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.33s 1.27s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.33s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 17
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 73 ( 29 unt; 4 def)
% Number of atoms : 378 ( 99 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 36 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 432 ( 161 ~; 133 |; 116 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 22 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 10 ( 8 usr; 5 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 8 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 141 ( 0 sgn 97 !; 44 ?; 18 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,conjecture,
( ( ! [X16] :
( cyclist(X16)
=> ? [X17] :
( X16 = X17
& person(X17) ) )
& ! [X14] :
( grocer(X14)
=> ? [X15] :
( X14 = X15
& person(X15) ) )
& ! [X12] :
( ( property1(X12,honest,pos)
& person(X12) )
=> ~ ? [X13] :
( X12 = X13
& property1(X13,dishonest,pos) ) )
& ! [X10] :
( ( property1(X10,healthy,pos)
& person(X10) )
=> ~ ? [X11] :
( X10 = X11
& property1(X11,unhealthy,pos) ) )
& ! [X8] :
( ( property1(X8,unhealthy,pos)
& cyclist(X8) )
=> ? [X9] :
( X8 = X9
& property1(X9,dishonest,pos) ) )
& ! [X6] :
( cyclist(X6)
=> ? [X7] :
( X6 = X7
& property1(X7,industrious,pos) ) )
& ! [X4] :
( ( property1(X4,industrious,pos)
& grocer(X4) )
=> ? [X5] :
( X4 = X5
& property1(X5,honest,pos) ) )
& ! [X2] :
( grocer(X2)
=> ~ ? [X3] :
( X2 = X3
& property1(X3,healthy,pos) ) )
& ! [X0] :
( ( property1(X0,industrious,pos)
& property1(X0,honest,pos)
& person(X0) )
=> ? [X1] :
( X0 = X1
& property1(X1,healthy,pos) ) ) )
=> ! [X18] :
( grocer(X18)
=> ~ ? [X19] :
( X18 = X19
& cyclist(X19) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( ! [X16] :
( cyclist(X16)
=> ? [X17] :
( X16 = X17
& person(X17) ) )
& ! [X14] :
( grocer(X14)
=> ? [X15] :
( X14 = X15
& person(X15) ) )
& ! [X12] :
( ( property1(X12,honest,pos)
& person(X12) )
=> ~ ? [X13] :
( X12 = X13
& property1(X13,dishonest,pos) ) )
& ! [X10] :
( ( property1(X10,healthy,pos)
& person(X10) )
=> ~ ? [X11] :
( X10 = X11
& property1(X11,unhealthy,pos) ) )
& ! [X8] :
( ( property1(X8,unhealthy,pos)
& cyclist(X8) )
=> ? [X9] :
( X8 = X9
& property1(X9,dishonest,pos) ) )
& ! [X6] :
( cyclist(X6)
=> ? [X7] :
( X6 = X7
& property1(X7,industrious,pos) ) )
& ! [X4] :
( ( property1(X4,industrious,pos)
& grocer(X4) )
=> ? [X5] :
( X4 = X5
& property1(X5,honest,pos) ) )
& ! [X2] :
( grocer(X2)
=> ~ ? [X3] :
( X2 = X3
& property1(X3,healthy,pos) ) )
& ! [X0] :
( ( property1(X0,industrious,pos)
& property1(X0,honest,pos)
& person(X0) )
=> ? [X1] :
( X0 = X1
& property1(X1,healthy,pos) ) ) )
=> ! [X18] :
( grocer(X18)
=> ~ ? [X19] :
( X18 = X19
& cyclist(X19) ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).
fof(f3,plain,
( ! [X16] :
( ~ cyclist(X16)
| ? [X17] :
( X16 = X17
& person(X17) ) )
& ! [X14] :
( ~ grocer(X14)
| ? [X15] :
( X14 = X15
& person(X15) ) )
& ! [X12] :
( ~ property1(X12,honest,pos)
| ~ person(X12)
| ! [X13] :
( X12 != X13
| ~ property1(X13,dishonest,pos) ) )
& ! [X10] :
( ~ property1(X10,healthy,pos)
| ~ person(X10)
| ! [X11] :
( X10 != X11
| ~ property1(X11,unhealthy,pos) ) )
& ! [X8] :
( ~ property1(X8,unhealthy,pos)
| ~ cyclist(X8)
| ? [X9] :
( X8 = X9
& property1(X9,dishonest,pos) ) )
& ! [X6] :
( ~ cyclist(X6)
| ? [X7] :
( X6 = X7
& property1(X7,industrious,pos) ) )
& ! [X4] :
( ~ property1(X4,industrious,pos)
| ~ grocer(X4)
| ? [X5] :
( X4 = X5
& property1(X5,honest,pos) ) )
& ! [X2] :
( ~ grocer(X2)
| ! [X3] :
( X2 != X3
| ~ property1(X3,healthy,pos) ) )
& ! [X0] :
( ~ property1(X0,industrious,pos)
| ~ property1(X0,honest,pos)
| ~ person(X0)
| ? [X1] :
( X0 = X1
& property1(X1,healthy,pos) ) )
& ? [X18] :
( grocer(X18)
& ? [X19] :
( X18 = X19
& cyclist(X19) ) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f4,plain,
( ! [X16] :
( ~ cyclist(X16)
| ? [X17] :
( X16 = X17
& person(X17) ) )
& ! [X14] :
( ~ grocer(X14)
| ? [X15] :
( X14 = X15
& person(X15) ) )
& ! [X12] :
( ~ property1(X12,honest,pos)
| ~ person(X12)
| ! [X13] :
( X12 != X13
| ~ property1(X13,dishonest,pos) ) )
& ! [X10] :
( ~ property1(X10,healthy,pos)
| ~ person(X10)
| ! [X11] :
( X10 != X11
| ~ property1(X11,unhealthy,pos) ) )
& ! [X8] :
( ~ property1(X8,unhealthy,pos)
| ~ cyclist(X8)
| ? [X9] :
( X8 = X9
& property1(X9,dishonest,pos) ) )
& ! [X6] :
( ~ cyclist(X6)
| ? [X7] :
( X6 = X7
& property1(X7,industrious,pos) ) )
& ! [X4] :
( ~ property1(X4,industrious,pos)
| ~ grocer(X4)
| ? [X5] :
( X4 = X5
& property1(X5,honest,pos) ) )
& ! [X2] :
( ~ grocer(X2)
| ! [X3] :
( X2 != X3
| ~ property1(X3,healthy,pos) ) )
& ! [X0] :
( ~ property1(X0,industrious,pos)
| ~ property1(X0,honest,pos)
| ~ person(X0)
| ? [X1] :
( X0 = X1
& property1(X1,healthy,pos) ) )
& ? [X18] :
( grocer(X18)
& ? [X19] :
( X18 = X19
& cyclist(X19) ) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f3]) ).
fof(f5,plain,
( ! [X18] :
( ~ cyclist(X18)
| ? [X19] :
( X18 = X19
& person(X19) ) )
& ! [X16] :
( ~ grocer(X16)
| ? [X17] :
( X16 = X17
& person(X17) ) )
& ! [X14] :
( ~ property1(X14,honest,pos)
| ~ person(X14)
| ! [X15] :
( X14 != X15
| ~ property1(X15,dishonest,pos) ) )
& ! [X12] :
( ~ property1(X12,healthy,pos)
| ~ person(X12)
| ! [X13] :
( X12 != X13
| ~ property1(X13,unhealthy,pos) ) )
& ! [X10] :
( ~ property1(X10,unhealthy,pos)
| ~ cyclist(X10)
| ? [X11] :
( X10 = X11
& property1(X11,dishonest,pos) ) )
& ! [X8] :
( ~ cyclist(X8)
| ? [X9] :
( X8 = X9
& property1(X9,industrious,pos) ) )
& ! [X6] :
( ~ property1(X6,industrious,pos)
| ~ grocer(X6)
| ? [X7] :
( X6 = X7
& property1(X7,honest,pos) ) )
& ! [X4] :
( ~ grocer(X4)
| ! [X5] :
( X4 != X5
| ~ property1(X5,healthy,pos) ) )
& ! [X2] :
( ~ property1(X2,industrious,pos)
| ~ property1(X2,honest,pos)
| ~ person(X2)
| ? [X3] :
( X2 = X3
& property1(X3,healthy,pos) ) )
& ? [X0] :
( grocer(X0)
& ? [X1] :
( X0 = X1
& cyclist(X1) ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).
fof(f6,plain,
( ! [X18] :
( ~ cyclist(X18)
| ( sK7(X18) = X18
& person(sK7(X18)) ) )
& ! [X16] :
( ~ grocer(X16)
| ( sK6(X16) = X16
& person(sK6(X16)) ) )
& ! [X14] :
( ~ property1(X14,honest,pos)
| ~ person(X14)
| ! [X15] :
( X14 != X15
| ~ property1(X15,dishonest,pos) ) )
& ! [X12] :
( ~ property1(X12,healthy,pos)
| ~ person(X12)
| ! [X13] :
( X12 != X13
| ~ property1(X13,unhealthy,pos) ) )
& ! [X10] :
( ~ property1(X10,unhealthy,pos)
| ~ cyclist(X10)
| ( sK5(X10) = X10
& property1(sK5(X10),dishonest,pos) ) )
& ! [X8] :
( ~ cyclist(X8)
| ( sK4(X8) = X8
& property1(sK4(X8),industrious,pos) ) )
& ! [X6] :
( ~ property1(X6,industrious,pos)
| ~ grocer(X6)
| ( sK3(X6) = X6
& property1(sK3(X6),honest,pos) ) )
& ! [X4] :
( ~ grocer(X4)
| ! [X5] :
( X4 != X5
| ~ property1(X5,healthy,pos) ) )
& ! [X2] :
( ~ property1(X2,industrious,pos)
| ~ property1(X2,honest,pos)
| ~ person(X2)
| ( sK2(X2) = X2
& property1(sK2(X2),healthy,pos) ) )
& grocer(sK0)
& sK0 = sK1
& cyclist(sK1) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4,sK5,sK6,sK7]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X3,sK2(X2)),skolemize(X7,sK3(X6)),skolemize(X9,sK4(X8)),skolemize(X11,sK5(X10)),skolemize(X17,sK6(X16)),skolemize(X19,sK7(X18))],[f5]) ).
fof(f7,plain,
! [X18] :
( ~ cyclist(X18)
| sK7(X18) = X18 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f8,plain,
! [X18] :
( ~ cyclist(X18)
| person(sK7(X18)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f15,plain,
! [X8] :
( ~ cyclist(X8)
| sK4(X8) = X8 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f16,plain,
! [X8] :
( ~ cyclist(X8)
| property1(sK4(X8),industrious,pos) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f17,plain,
! [X6] :
( ~ property1(X6,industrious,pos)
| ~ grocer(X6)
| sK3(X6) = X6 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f18,plain,
! [X6] :
( ~ property1(X6,industrious,pos)
| ~ grocer(X6)
| property1(sK3(X6),honest,pos) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f19,plain,
! [X4,X5] :
( ~ grocer(X4)
| X4 != X5
| ~ property1(X5,healthy,pos) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f20,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ property1(X2,industrious,pos)
| ~ property1(X2,honest,pos)
| ~ person(X2)
| sK2(X2) = X2 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f21,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ property1(X2,industrious,pos)
| ~ property1(X2,honest,pos)
| ~ person(X2)
| property1(sK2(X2),healthy,pos) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f22,plain,
grocer(sK0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f23,plain,
sK0 = sK1,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f24,plain,
cyclist(sK1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f25,plain,
grocer(sK1),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f22,f23]) ).
fof(f26,plain,
! [X5] :
( ~ grocer(X5)
| ~ property1(X5,healthy,pos) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f19]) ).
tcf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
cyclist(sK1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).
tcf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
grocer(sK1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).
tcf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
! [X0: $i] :
( property1(sK2(X0),healthy,pos)
| ~ person(X0)
| ~ property1(X0,industrious,pos)
| ~ property1(X0,honest,pos) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).
tcf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( sK2(X0) = X0 )
| ~ person(X0)
| ~ property1(X0,industrious,pos)
| ~ property1(X0,honest,pos) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).
tcf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ grocer(X0)
| ~ property1(X0,healthy,pos) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).
tcf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
! [X0: $i] :
( property1(sK3(X0),honest,pos)
| ~ grocer(X0)
| ~ property1(X0,industrious,pos) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).
tcf(c_55,negated_conjecture,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( sK3(X0) = X0 )
| ~ grocer(X0)
| ~ property1(X0,industrious,pos) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).
tcf(c_56,negated_conjecture,
! [X0: $i] :
( property1(sK4(X0),industrious,pos)
| ~ cyclist(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).
tcf(c_57,negated_conjecture,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( sK4(X0) = X0 )
| ~ cyclist(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).
tcf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
! [X0: $i] :
( person(sK7(X0))
| ~ cyclist(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
tcf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( sK7(X0) = X0 )
| ~ cyclist(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
tcf(c_260,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( sK3(X0) = X0 )
| ~ property1(X0,industrious,pos)
| ( X0 != sK1 ) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_55]) ).
tcf(c_261,plain,
( ( sK3(sK1) = sK1 )
| ~ property1(sK1,industrious,pos) ),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_260]) ).
tcf(c_268,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( property1(sK3(X0),honest,pos)
| ~ property1(X0,industrious,pos)
| ( X0 != sK1 ) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_269,plain,
( property1(sK3(sK1),honest,pos)
| ~ property1(sK1,industrious,pos) ),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_268]) ).
tcf(c_276,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ property1(X0,healthy,pos)
| ( X0 != sK1 ) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_53]) ).
tcf(c_277,plain,
~ property1(sK1,healthy,pos),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_276]) ).
tcf(c_288,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( sK7(X0) = X0 )
| ( X0 != sK1 ) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_65]) ).
tcf(c_289,plain,
sK7(sK1) = sK1,
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_288]) ).
tcf(c_293,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( person(sK7(X0))
| ( X0 != sK1 ) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_64]) ).
tcf(c_294,plain,
person(sK7(sK1)),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_293]) ).
tcf(c_314,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( sK4(X0) = X0 )
| ( X0 != sK1 ) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_57]) ).
tcf(c_315,plain,
sK4(sK1) = sK1,
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_314]) ).
tcf(c_319,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( property1(sK4(X0),industrious,pos)
| ( X0 != sK1 ) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_56]) ).
tcf(c_320,plain,
property1(sK4(sK1),industrious,pos),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_319]) ).
tcf(c_386,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( sK2(X0) = X0 )
| ~ property1(X0,industrious,pos)
| ~ property1(X0,honest,pos)
| ( sK7(sK1) != X0 ) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_294]) ).
tcf(c_387,plain,
( ( sK2(sK7(sK1)) = sK7(sK1) )
| ~ property1(sK7(sK1),industrious,pos)
| ~ property1(sK7(sK1),honest,pos) ),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_386]) ).
tcf(c_397,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( property1(sK2(X0),healthy,pos)
| ~ property1(X0,industrious,pos)
| ~ property1(X0,honest,pos)
| ( sK7(sK1) != X0 ) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_294]) ).
tcf(c_398,plain,
( property1(sK2(sK7(sK1)),healthy,pos)
| ~ property1(sK7(sK1),industrious,pos)
| ~ property1(sK7(sK1),honest,pos) ),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_397]) ).
tcf(c_428,definition,
iPr_def_10 = sK7(sK1),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).
tcf(c_429,definition,
iPr_def_11 = sK2(iPr_def_10),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).
tcf(c_432,definition,
iPr_def_14 = sK4(sK1),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).
tcf(c_434,definition,
iPr_def_16 = sK3(sK1),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_16])],[]) ).
tcf(c_435,plain,
( property1(iPr_def_11,healthy,pos)
| ~ property1(iPr_def_10,industrious,pos)
| ~ property1(iPr_def_10,honest,pos) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_398,c_429,c_428]) ).
tcf(c_436,plain,
( ( iPr_def_11 = iPr_def_10 )
| ~ property1(iPr_def_10,industrious,pos)
| ~ property1(iPr_def_10,honest,pos) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_387]) ).
tcf(c_443,plain,
property1(iPr_def_14,industrious,pos),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_320,c_432]) ).
tcf(c_444,plain,
iPr_def_14 = sK1,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_315]) ).
tcf(c_447,plain,
iPr_def_10 = sK1,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_289]) ).
tcf(c_448,plain,
~ property1(sK1,healthy,pos),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_277]) ).
tcf(c_449,plain,
( property1(iPr_def_16,honest,pos)
| ~ property1(sK1,industrious,pos) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_269,c_434]) ).
tcf(c_450,plain,
( ( iPr_def_16 = sK1 )
| ~ property1(sK1,industrious,pos) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_261]) ).
tcf(c_716,plain,
iPr_def_10 = iPr_def_14,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_444,c_447]) ).
tcf(c_717,plain,
property1(iPr_def_10,industrious,pos),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_443,c_716]) ).
tcf(c_719,plain,
~ property1(iPr_def_10,healthy,pos),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_448,c_447]) ).
tcf(c_730,plain,
( property1(iPr_def_16,honest,pos)
| ~ property1(iPr_def_10,industrious,pos) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_449,c_447]) ).
tcf(c_743,plain,
property1(iPr_def_16,honest,pos),
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_730,c_717]) ).
tcf(c_746,plain,
( ( iPr_def_10 = iPr_def_16 )
| ~ property1(iPr_def_10,industrious,pos) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_450,c_447]) ).
tcf(c_747,plain,
iPr_def_10 = iPr_def_16,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_746,c_717]) ).
tcf(c_749,plain,
property1(iPr_def_10,honest,pos),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_743,c_747]) ).
tcf(c_754,plain,
property1(iPr_def_11,healthy,pos),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_435,c_435,c_717,c_749]) ).
tcf(c_756,plain,
iPr_def_11 = iPr_def_10,
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_436,c_436,c_717,c_749]) ).
tcf(c_758,plain,
property1(iPr_def_10,healthy,pos),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_754,c_756]) ).
tcf(c_761,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_758,c_719]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : PUZ129+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 07:05:06 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.41
% 0.13/0.41 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.41
% 0.13/0.41 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.42 % Proving...
% 1.33/1.27 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.33/1.27 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.33/1.27
% 1.33/1.27 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.33/1.27
% 1.33/1.27 % ------ iProver source info
% 1.33/1.27
% 1.33/1.27 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.33/1.27 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.33/1.27 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.33/1.27
% 1.33/1.27 % ------ Parsing...
% 1.33/1.27 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 1.33/1.27
% 1.33/1.27 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e %
% 1.33/1.27
% 1.33/1.27 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 1.33/1.27
% 1.33/1.27 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 1.33/1.27 % ------ Proving...
% 1.33/1.27 % ------ Problem Properties
% 1.33/1.27
% 1.33/1.27 %
% 1.33/1.27 % clauses 24
% 1.33/1.27 % conjectures 0
% 1.33/1.27 % EPR 17
% 1.33/1.27 % Horn 24
% 1.33/1.27 % unary 12
% 1.33/1.27 % binary 8
% 1.33/1.27 % lits 40
% 1.33/1.27 % lits eq 14
% 1.33/1.27 % fd_pure 0
% 1.33/1.27 % fd_pseudo 0
% 1.33/1.27 % fd_cond 0
% 1.33/1.27 % fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 1.33/1.27 % AC symbols 0
% 1.33/1.27
% 1.33/1.27 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 1.33/1.27
% 1.33/1.27 % ------ no conjectures: strip conj schedule
% 1.33/1.27
% 1.33/1.27 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" stripped conjectures Time Limit: 10.
% 1.33/1.27
% 1.33/1.27
% 1.33/1.27 % ------
% 1.33/1.27 % Current options:
% 1.33/1.27 % ------
% 1.33/1.27
% 1.33/1.27
% 1.33/1.27 %
% 1.33/1.27
% 1.33/1.27 % ------ Proving...
% 1.33/1.27 %
% 1.33/1.27
% 1.33/1.27 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.33/1.27
% 1.33/1.27 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.33/1.27
% 1.33/1.27
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------