↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : PUZ131+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 13:42:26 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 30.84s 30.94s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 30.84s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.07  % Problem    : PUZ131+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.07/0.25  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.25  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.25  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.25  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.25  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.25  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.07/0.25  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.07/0.25  % DateTime   : Tue Jun 18 10:45:39 EDT 2024
% 0.07/0.25  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.12/0.47  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 30.84/30.93  %-------------------------------------------
% 30.84/30.93  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 30.84/30.93  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 30.84/30.93  % Transform   :cnf
% 30.84/30.93  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 30.84/30.93  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 30.84/30.93  
% 30.84/30.93  % Result      :Theorem 30.430000s
% 30.84/30.93  % Output      :CNFRefutation 30.430000s
% 30.84/30.93  %-------------------------------------------
% 30.84/30.94  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 30.84/30.94  % File     : PUZ131+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 30.84/30.94  % Domain   : Puzzles
% 30.84/30.94  % Problem  : Victor teaches Michael
% 30.84/30.94  % Version  : Especial.
% 30.84/30.94  % English  : Every student is enrolled in at least one course. Every professor
% 30.84/30.94  %            teaches at least one course. Every course has at least one student
% 30.84/30.94  %            enrolled. Every course has at least one professor teaching. The
% 30.84/30.94  %            coordinator of a course teaches the course. If a student is
% 30.84/30.94  %            enroled in a course then the student is taught by every professor
% 30.84/30.94  %            who teaches the course. Michael is enrolled in CSC410. Victor is
% 30.84/30.94  %            the coordinator of CSC410. Therefore, Michael is taught by Victor.
% 30.84/30.94  
% 30.84/30.94  % Refs     :
% 30.84/30.94  % Source   : [TPTP]
% 30.84/30.94  % Names    :
% 30.84/30.94  
% 30.84/30.94  % Status   : Theorem
% 30.84/30.94  % Rating   : 0.06 v7.4.0, 0.07 v7.1.0, 0.13 v7.0.0, 0.07 v6.4.0, 0.12 v6.3.0, 0.04 v6.2.0, 0.08 v6.1.0, 0.10 v6.0.0, 0.04 v5.3.0, 0.11 v5.2.0, 0.05 v5.0.0, 0.04 v4.1.0
% 30.84/30.94  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   9 unt;   0 def)
% 30.84/30.94  %            Number of atoms       :   31 (   1 equ)
% 30.84/30.94  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   1 avg)
% 30.84/30.94  %            Number of connectives :   15 (   0   ~;   0   |;   5   &)
% 30.84/30.94  %                                         (   0 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 30.84/30.94  %            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
% 30.84/30.94  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 30.84/30.94  %            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 30.84/30.94  %            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
% 30.84/30.94  %            Number of variables   :   16 (   9   !;   7   ?)
% 30.84/30.94  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 30.84/30.94  
% 30.84/30.94  % Comments :
% 30.84/30.94  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 30.84/30.94  fof(student_type,axiom,
% 30.84/30.94      ? [A] : student(A) ).
% 30.84/30.94  
% 30.84/30.94  fof(professor_type,axiom,
% 30.84/30.94      ? [A] : professor(A) ).
% 30.84/30.94  
% 30.84/30.94  fof(course_type,axiom,
% 30.84/30.94      ? [A] : course(A) ).
% 30.84/30.94  
% 30.84/30.94  fof(michael_type,axiom,
% 30.84/30.94      student(michael) ).
% 30.84/30.94  
% 30.84/30.94  fof(victor_type,axiom,
% 30.84/30.94      professor(victor) ).
% 30.84/30.94  
% 30.84/30.94  fof(csc410_type,axiom,
% 30.84/30.94      course(csc410) ).
% 30.84/30.94  
% 30.84/30.94  fof(coordinator_of_type,axiom,
% 30.84/30.94      ! [A] :
% 30.84/30.94        ( course(A)
% 30.84/30.94       => professor(coordinatorof(A)) ) ).
% 30.84/30.94  
% 30.84/30.94  fof(student_enrolled_axiom,axiom,
% 30.84/30.94      ! [X] :
% 30.84/30.94        ( student(X)
% 30.84/30.94       => ? [Y] :
% 30.84/30.94            ( course(Y)
% 30.84/30.94            & enrolled(X,Y) ) ) ).
% 30.84/30.94  
% 30.84/30.94  fof(professor_teaches,axiom,
% 30.84/30.94      ! [X] :
% 30.84/30.94        ( professor(X)
% 30.84/30.94       => ? [Y] :
% 30.84/30.94            ( course(Y)
% 30.84/30.94            & teaches(X,Y) ) ) ).
% 30.84/30.94  
% 30.84/30.94  fof(course_enrolled,axiom,
% 30.84/30.94      ! [X] :
% 30.84/30.94        ( course(X)
% 30.84/30.94       => ? [Y] :
% 30.84/30.94            ( student(Y)
% 30.84/30.94            & enrolled(Y,X) ) ) ).
% 30.84/30.94  
% 30.84/30.94  fof(course_teaches,axiom,
% 30.84/30.94      ! [X] :
% 30.84/30.94        ( course(X)
% 30.84/30.94       => ? [Y] :
% 30.84/30.94            ( professor(Y)
% 30.84/30.94            & teaches(Y,X) ) ) ).
% 30.84/30.94  
% 30.84/30.94  fof(coordinator_teaches,axiom,
% 30.84/30.94      ! [X] :
% 30.84/30.94        ( course(X)
% 30.84/30.94       => teaches(coordinatorof(X),X) ) ).
% 30.84/30.94  
% 30.84/30.94  fof(student_enrolled_taught,axiom,
% 30.84/30.94      ! [X,Y] :
% 30.84/30.94        ( ( student(X)
% 30.84/30.94          & course(Y) )
% 30.84/30.94       => ( enrolled(X,Y)
% 30.84/30.94         => ! [Z] :
% 30.84/30.94              ( professor(Z)
% 30.84/30.94             => ( teaches(Z,Y)
% 30.84/30.94               => taughtby(X,Z) ) ) ) ) ).
% 30.84/30.94  
% 30.84/30.94  fof(michael_enrolled_csc410_axiom,axiom,
% 30.84/30.94      enrolled(michael,csc410) ).
% 30.84/30.94  
% 30.84/30.94  fof(victor_coordinator_csc410_axiom,axiom,
% 30.84/30.94      coordinatorof(csc410) = victor ).
% 30.84/30.94  
% 30.84/30.94  fof(teaching_conjecture,conjecture,
% 30.84/30.94      taughtby(michael,victor) ).
% 30.84/30.94  
% 30.84/30.94  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 30.84/30.94  %-------------------------------------------
% 30.84/30.94  % Proof found
% 30.84/30.94  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 30.84/30.94  % SZS output start Proof
% 30.84/30.94  %ClaNum:37(EqnAxiom:17)
% 30.84/30.94  %VarNum:34(SingletonVarNum:13)
% 30.84/30.94  %MaxLitNum:6
% 30.84/30.94  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 30.84/30.94  %SharedTerms:16
% 30.84/30.94  %goalClause: 26
% 30.84/30.94  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 30.84/30.94  [19]P1(a4)
% 30.84/30.94  [20]P1(a5)
% 30.84/30.94  [21]P2(a3)
% 30.84/30.94  [22]P2(a6)
% 30.84/30.94  [23]P3(a1)
% 30.84/30.94  [24]P3(a7)
% 30.84/30.94  [25]P4(a4,a1)
% 30.84/30.94  [26]~P5(a4,a3)
% 30.84/30.94  [18]E(f2(a1),a3)
% 30.84/30.94  [27]~P3(x271)+P1(f8(x271))
% 30.84/30.94  [28]~P3(x281)+P2(f2(x281))
% 30.84/30.94  [29]~P3(x291)+P2(f11(x291))
% 30.84/30.94  [30]~P1(x301)+P3(f9(x301))
% 30.84/30.94  [31]~P2(x311)+P3(f10(x311))
% 30.84/30.94  [32]~P1(x321)+P4(x321,f9(x321))
% 30.84/30.94  [33]~P2(x331)+P6(x331,f10(x331))
% 30.84/30.94  [34]~P3(x341)+P4(f8(x341),x341)
% 30.84/30.94  [35]~P3(x351)+P6(f2(x351),x351)
% 30.84/30.94  [36]~P3(x361)+P6(f11(x361),x361)
% 30.84/30.94  [37]~P1(x371)+~P2(x372)+~P4(x371,x373)+~P6(x372,x373)+P5(x371,x372)+~P3(x373)
% 30.84/30.94  %EqnAxiom
% 30.84/30.94  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 30.84/30.94  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 30.84/30.94  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 30.84/30.94  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f2(x41),f2(x42))
% 30.84/30.94  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f8(x51),f8(x52))
% 30.84/30.94  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f11(x61),f11(x62))
% 30.84/30.94  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f10(x71),f10(x72))
% 30.84/30.94  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f9(x81),f9(x82))
% 30.84/30.94  [9]~P1(x91)+P1(x92)+~E(x91,x92)
% 30.84/30.94  [10]P6(x102,x103)+~E(x101,x102)+~P6(x101,x103)
% 30.84/30.94  [11]P6(x113,x112)+~E(x111,x112)+~P6(x113,x111)
% 30.84/30.94  [12]~P2(x121)+P2(x122)+~E(x121,x122)
% 30.84/30.94  [13]~P3(x131)+P3(x132)+~E(x131,x132)
% 30.84/30.94  [14]P5(x142,x143)+~E(x141,x142)+~P5(x141,x143)
% 30.84/30.94  [15]P5(x153,x152)+~E(x151,x152)+~P5(x153,x151)
% 30.84/30.94  [16]P4(x162,x163)+~E(x161,x162)+~P4(x161,x163)
% 30.84/30.94  [17]P4(x173,x172)+~E(x171,x172)+~P4(x173,x171)
% 30.84/30.94  
% 30.84/30.94  %-------------------------------------------
% 30.84/30.95  cnf(39,plain,
% 30.84/30.95     (P2(f2(a1))),
% 30.84/30.95     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,18,2,12])).
% 30.84/30.95  cnf(792,plain,
% 30.84/30.95     (~P5(x7921,f2(a1))+P5(a4,a3)+~E(x7921,a4)),
% 30.84/30.95     inference(scs_inference,[],[26,18,14,15])).
% 30.84/30.95  cnf(793,plain,
% 30.84/30.95     (~P5(a4,f2(a1))+P5(a4,a3)),
% 30.84/30.95     inference(equality_inference,[],[792])).
% 30.84/30.95  cnf(794,plain,
% 30.84/30.95     (~P5(a4,f2(a1))),
% 30.84/30.95     inference(scs_inference,[],[26,793])).
% 30.84/30.95  cnf(7204,plain,
% 30.84/30.95     (~E(a1,x72041)+P3(x72041)),
% 30.84/30.95     inference(scs_inference,[],[23,13])).
% 30.84/30.95  cnf(7935,plain,
% 30.84/30.95     (P6(f2(x79351),x79351)+~E(a1,x79351)),
% 30.84/30.95     inference(scs_inference,[],[7204,35])).
% 30.84/30.95  cnf(7936,plain,
% 30.84/30.95     (P6(f2(a1),a1)),
% 30.84/30.95     inference(equality_inference,[],[7935])).
% 30.84/30.95  cnf(7984,plain,
% 30.84/30.95     ($false),
% 30.84/30.95     inference(scs_inference,[],[19,25,23,7936,794,39,37]),
% 30.84/30.95     ['proof']).
% 30.84/30.95  % SZS output end Proof
% 30.84/30.95  % Total time :30.430000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------