%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : PUZ131_10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:01:57 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.07s 0.34s
% Output : Saturation 0.07s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_9ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_22ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tcf(c_0_12,plain,
! [X2: course] : teaches(coordinatorof(X2),X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_13,plain,
coordinatorof(csc410) = victor,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[victor_coordinator_csc410_axiom]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_14,plain,
! [X1: student,X3: professor,X2: course] :
( ~ teaches(X3,X2)
| ~ enrolled(X1,X2)
| taughtby(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_15,plain,
! [X3: professor] : teaches(X3,esk2_1(X3)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_17,plain,
! [X2: course] : teaches(esk4_1(X2),X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_18,plain,
teaches(victor,csc410),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_19,plain,
! [X1: student,X3: professor] :
( ~ enrolled(X1,esk2_1(X3))
| taughtby(X1,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_20,plain,
! [X2: course] : enrolled(esk3_1(X2),X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_22,plain,
! [X1: student,X2: course] :
( ~ enrolled(X1,X2)
| taughtby(X1,coordinatorof(X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_12]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_23,plain,
! [X1: student,X2: course] :
( ~ enrolled(X1,X2)
| taughtby(X1,esk4_1(X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_17]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_24,plain,
! [X1: student] :
( ~ enrolled(X1,csc410)
| taughtby(X1,victor) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_18]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_25,plain,
! [X3: professor] : taughtby(esk3_1(esk2_1(X3)),X3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_26,plain,
! [X1: student] : enrolled(X1,esk1_1(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_27,plain,
enrolled(michael,csc410),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[michael_enrolled_csc410_axiom]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01 % Problem : PUZ131_10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.2.0.
% 0.00/0.02 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.04/0.30 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.04/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.04/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.04/0.30 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.04/0.30 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.04/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.04/0.30 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 03:52:10 UTC 2026
% 0.04/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.04/0.31 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.33 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.07/0.33 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.34 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.07/0.34 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.34 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1503280 completed with status 1
% 0.07/0.34 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.07/0.34 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.34 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.07/0.34 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.07/0.34 % Search class: FHUSM-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.07/0.34 % partial match(1): FHUSM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.07/0.34 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 136s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1503287 completed with status 1
% 0.07/0.34 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.07/0.34 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.34 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.07/0.34 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.07/0.34 % Search class: FHUSM-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.07/0.34 % partial match(1): FHUSM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.07/0.34 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.07/0.34 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.34 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.07/0.34
% 0.07/0.34 % No proof found!
% 0.07/0.34 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.07/0.34 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.07/0.34 % Parsed axioms : 18
% 0.07/0.34 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Initial clauses : 18
% 0.07/0.34 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 10
% 0.07/0.34 % Initial clauses in saturation : 8
% 0.07/0.34 % Processed clauses : 15
% 0.07/0.34 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % ...subsumed : 1
% 0.07/0.34 % ...remaining for further processing : 14
% 0.07/0.34 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Generated clauses : 7
% 0.07/0.34 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7
% 0.07/0.34 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Paramodulations : 7
% 0.07/0.34 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % NegExts : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.34 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.34 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.34 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.34 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.34 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.34 % Current number of processed clauses : 14
% 0.07/0.34 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 9
% 0.07/0.34 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Non-unit-clauses : 5
% 0.07/0.34 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.07/0.34 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5
% 0.07/0.34 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.07/0.34 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.07/0.34 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.07/0.34 % Termbank termtop insertions : 512
% 0.07/0.34 % Search garbage collected termcells : 40
% 0.07/0.34
% 0.07/0.34 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.07/0.34 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.07/0.34 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.07/0.34 % Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.07/0.34 % Maximum resident set size: 3588 pages
% 0.07/0.34
% 0.07/0.34 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.07/0.34 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.07/0.34 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.07/0.34 % Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.07/0.34 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.07/0.34 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------