↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : PUZ137^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.jv0p5ourYV true

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:49:46 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 1.26s 2.44s
% Output   : Refutation 1.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.88  % Problem  : PUZ137^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v5.3.0.
% 0.10/0.96  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.jv0p5ourYV true
% 0.14/1.35  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.14/1.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/1.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/1.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/1.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/1.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/1.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/1.35  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 15:07:09 EDT 2025
% 0.16/1.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/1.36  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.16/1.36  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/1.38  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.16/1.40  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.16/1.42  % Running in HO mode
% 0.45/1.94  % Total configuration time : 828
% 0.45/1.94  % Estimated wc time : 1656
% 0.45/1.94  % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0
% 0.46/2.26  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s
% 1.22/2.32  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s
% 1.22/2.34  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s
% 1.25/2.36  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s
% 1.25/2.38  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s
% 1.25/2.40  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s
% 1.26/2.44  % Solved by lams/40_c.s.sh.
% 1.26/2.44  % done 7 iterations in 0.017s
% 1.26/2.44  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.26/2.44  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.26/2.44  thf(sk__type, type, sk_: $o).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(peter_type, type, peter: $i).
% 1.26/2.44  thf('#sk1_type', type, '#sk1': $o).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(says_type, type, says: $i > $o > $o).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(thm, conjecture, (![X:$o]: ( says @ peter @ X ))).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( ![X:$o]: ( says @ peter @ X ) )),
% 1.26/2.44    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [thm])).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain, (~ (says @ peter @ sk_)),
% 1.26/2.44      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain, (( (sk_) | ~ (says @ peter @ ($false)))),
% 1.26/2.44      inference('bool_hoist', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1])).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, ((~ (sk_) | ~ (says @ peter @ ($true)))),
% 1.26/2.44      inference('bool_hoist', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1])).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(ax1, axiom,
% 1.26/2.44    (says @ peter @ ( ![X:$o]: ( ( says @ peter @ X ) => ( ~( X ) ) ) ))).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 1.26/2.44      ( (says @ peter @ 
% 1.26/2.44         (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $o]: (((says @ peter @ Y0) => (((~) @ Y0))))))))),
% 1.26/2.44      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax1])).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 1.26/2.44      ( (says @ peter @ 
% 1.26/2.44         ((^[Y0 : $o]: (((says @ peter @ Y0) => (((~) @ Y0))))) @ '#sk1'))),
% 1.26/2.44      inference('quantifier_rw', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 1.26/2.44      ( (says @ peter @ (((says @ peter @ '#sk1') => (((~) @ '#sk1')))))),
% 1.26/2.44      inference('ho_norm', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5])).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 1.26/2.44      ((~ ('#sk1')
% 1.26/2.44        |  (says @ peter @ (((says @ peter @ ($true)) => (((~) @ ($true)))))))),
% 1.26/2.44      inference('bool_hoist', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6])).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 1.26/2.44      ((~ ('#sk1') |  (says @ peter @ (((~) @ (says @ peter @ ($true))))))),
% 1.26/2.44      inference('simplify boolean subterms', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8])).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(zip_derived_cl14, plain,
% 1.26/2.44      (( (says @ peter @ ($true))
% 1.26/2.44        | ~ ('#sk1')
% 1.26/2.44        |  (says @ peter @ (((~) @ ($false)))))),
% 1.26/2.44      inference('bool_hoist', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13])).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain,
% 1.26/2.44      (( (says @ peter @ ($true)) | ~ ('#sk1') |  (says @ peter @ ($true)))),
% 1.26/2.44      inference('simplify boolean subterms', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl14])).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(zip_derived_cl19, plain, ((~ ('#sk1') |  (says @ peter @ ($true)))),
% 1.26/2.44      inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl18])).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 1.26/2.44      (( ('#sk1')
% 1.26/2.44        |  (says @ peter @ (((says @ peter @ ($false)) => (((~) @ ($false)))))))),
% 1.26/2.44      inference('bool_hoist', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6])).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain, (( ('#sk1') |  (says @ peter @ ($true)))),
% 1.26/2.44      inference('simplify boolean subterms', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl7])).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(zip_derived_cl27, plain, ( (says @ peter @ ($true))),
% 1.26/2.44      inference('clc', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl19, zip_derived_cl16])).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(zip_derived_cl28, plain, (~ (sk_)),
% 1.26/2.44      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl27])).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(zip_derived_cl32, plain, (~ (says @ peter @ ($false))),
% 1.26/2.44      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl28])).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(zip_derived_cl27, plain, ( (says @ peter @ ($true))),
% 1.26/2.44      inference('clc', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl19, zip_derived_cl16])).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 1.26/2.44      ( (says @ peter @ 
% 1.26/2.44         (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $o]: (((says @ peter @ Y0) => (((~) @ Y0))))))))),
% 1.26/2.44      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax1])).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 1.26/2.44      (![X-81 : $o]:
% 1.26/2.44         ( ((^[Y0 : $o]: (((says @ peter @ Y0) => (((~) @ Y0))))) @ X-81)
% 1.26/2.44          |  (says @ peter @ ($false)))),
% 1.26/2.44      inference('forall_hoist', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 1.26/2.44      (![X-81 : $o]:
% 1.26/2.44         ( (((says @ peter @ X-81) => (((~) @ X-81))))
% 1.26/2.44          |  (says @ peter @ ($false)))),
% 1.26/2.44      inference('ho_norm', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4])).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 1.26/2.44      (![X0 : $o]:
% 1.26/2.44         ( (((says @ peter @ X0) => (((~) @ X0)))) |  (says @ peter @ ($false)))),
% 1.26/2.44      inference('cannonize vars', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl9])).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain,
% 1.26/2.44      (![X0 : $o]:
% 1.26/2.44         ( (says @ peter @ ($false)) | ~ (X0) | ~ (says @ peter @ X0))),
% 1.26/2.44      inference('cnf_otf', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl10])).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(zip_derived_cl30, plain, ( (says @ peter @ ($false))),
% 1.26/2.44      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl27, zip_derived_cl12])).
% 1.26/2.44  thf(zip_derived_cl34, plain, ($false),
% 1.26/2.44      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl32, zip_derived_cl30])).
% 1.26/2.44  
% 1.26/2.44  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.26/2.44  
% 1.26/2.44  
% 1.26/2.45  % Terminating...
% 1.57/2.89  % Runner terminated.
% 1.62/2.91  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------