↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : PUZ140^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:20:49 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.45s 0.99s
% Output   : Refutation 1.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   7 unt;   0 typ;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   19 (   7 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   44 (   8   ~;   2   |;   4   &;  30   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   14 (  14   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   1   ^;  11   !;   7   ?;  20   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   1  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(syrup_type,type,
    syrup: $tType ).

thf(beverage_type,type,
    beverage: $tType ).

thf(coffee_decl,type,
    coffee: beverage ).

thf(heat_decl,type,
    heat: beverage > beverage ).

thf(hot_decl,type,
    hot: beverage > $o ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: ( beverage > syrup > beverage ) > syrup ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( ^ [A: beverage > syrup > beverage] :
        @+[B: syrup] :
          ~ ? [C: beverage] :
              ( ( ( A @ coffee @ B )
                = C )
              & ( hot @ C ) ) ) ) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: beverage] : ( hot @ ( heat @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',its_hot) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ! [A: beverage] : ( hot @ ( heat @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ! [A: beverage] : ( hot @ ( heat @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[8]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ? [A: beverage > syrup > beverage] :
    ! [B: syrup] :
    ? [C: beverage] :
      ( ( ( A @ coffee @ B )
        = C )
      & ( hot @ C ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hot_coffee) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [A: beverage > syrup > beverage] :
      ! [B: syrup] :
      ? [C: beverage] :
        ( ( ( A @ coffee @ B )
          = C )
        & ( hot @ C ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ~ ? [A: beverage > syrup > beverage] :
      ! [B: syrup] :
      ? [C: beverage] :
        ( ( ( A @ coffee @ B )
          = C )
        & ( hot @ C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ! [B: beverage,A: beverage > syrup > beverage] :
      ( ( ( A @ coffee @ ( sk1 @ A ) )
       != B )
      | ~ ( hot @ B ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[4]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ! [B: beverage,A: beverage > syrup > beverage] :
      ( ( ( A @ coffee @ ( sk1 @ A ) )
       != B )
      | ~ ( hot @ B ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ! [A: beverage > syrup > beverage] :
      ~ ( hot @ ( A @ coffee @ ( sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[9,7]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : PUZ140^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.07/0.12  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.12  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.12  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.12  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.12  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.12  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.12  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.12  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:26:48 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.12  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.12  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.40/0.39  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 0.56/0.48  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (87ms). 
% 0.56/0.48  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 0.88/0.67  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 0.88/0.67  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.04/0.71  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 1 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.04/0.73  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 1 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.04/0.73  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 1.04/0.73  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.04/0.74  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 1.45/0.99  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 1.45/0.99  % Time passed: 798ms (effective reasoning time: 501ms)
% 1.45/0.99  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 1.45/0.99  % Axioms used in derivation (1): its_hot
% 1.45/0.99  % No. of inferences in proof: 11
% 1.45/0.99  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 798 ms resp. 501 ms w/o parsing
% 1.73/1.02  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.73/1.02  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------