%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : PUZ152_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:02:01 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.15s 0.42s
% Output : Saturation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_6ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_10ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
( ~ says(b,$false)
| says(c,$true) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( says(X1,$false)
| says(X1,$true) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
( ~ says(a,$false)
| says(b,$true)
| exactly_one_truthteller ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ says(X1,$false)
| ~ says(X1,$true) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
( says(b,$false)
| says(a,$false)
| exactly_one_truthteller ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
( says(c,$false)
| says(b,$false) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
( exactly_one_truthteller
| says(esk3_0,$true) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_9]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
( exactly_one_truthteller
| says(esk2_0,$true) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_16]),c_0_12]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
( exactly_one_truthteller
| says(b,$true)
| says(a,$true) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
( ~ says(a,$true)
| exactly_one_truthteller
| says(b,$false) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
( ~ says(c,$true)
| says(b,$false) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_21]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_28,hypothesis,
( esk3_0 != esk2_0
| exactly_one_truthteller ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_16]),c_0_14]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_29,hypothesis,
( ~ exactly_one_truthteller
| says(b,$false)
| says(a,$true) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
( ~ says(a,$true)
| ~ exactly_one_truthteller
| says(b,$true) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( ~ exactly_one_truthteller
| says(esk1_0,$true) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ exactly_one_truthteller
| ~ says(X2,$true)
| ~ says(X1,$true)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : PUZ152_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 03:56:51 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.42 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1310882 completed with status 1
% 0.15/0.42 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.15/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.42 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.42 % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1310888 completed with status 1
% 0.15/0.42 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.15/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.42 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.42 % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 % No proof found!
% 0.15/0.42 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.15/0.42 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.42 % Parsed axioms : 9
% 0.15/0.42 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Initial clauses : 18
% 0.15/0.42 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.15/0.42 % Initial clauses in saturation : 13
% 0.15/0.42 % Processed clauses : 24
% 0.15/0.42 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % ...subsumed : 2
% 0.15/0.42 % ...remaining for further processing : 22
% 0.15/0.42 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Backward-subsumed : 6
% 0.15/0.42 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Generated clauses : 20
% 0.15/0.42 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 14
% 0.15/0.42 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 3
% 0.15/0.42 % Paramodulations : 20
% 0.15/0.42 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 % Current number of processed clauses : 16
% 0.15/0.42 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Non-unit-clauses : 16
% 0.15/0.42 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.42 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 0.15/0.42 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 44
% 0.15/0.42 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 43
% 0.15/0.42 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 11
% 0.15/0.42 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.42 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1029
% 0.15/0.42 % Search garbage collected termcells : 150
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.42 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.42 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 % User time : 0.015 s
% 0.15/0.42 % System time : 0.013 s
% 0.15/0.42 % Total time : 0.028 s
% 0.15/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.15/0.42 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------