↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.CSA-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : PUZ153+1 : TPTP v9.1.0. Released v9.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr  1 01:59:45 AM UTC 2025

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 0.12s 0.37s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : PUZ153+1 : TPTP v9.1.0. Released v9.1.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Mar 31 10:58:56 EDT 2025
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.37  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.37  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.12/0.37  #
% 0.12/0.37  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.37  # Number of axioms: 11 Number of unprocessed: 11
% 0.12/0.37  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.37  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.37  # Hello from C++
% 0.12/0.37  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.12/0.37  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.12/0.37  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.12/0.37  # 11 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.12/0.37  # Creating start rules for all 4 conjectures.
% 0.12/0.37  # There are 4 start rule candidates:
% 0.12/0.37  # Found 6 unit axioms.
% 0.12/0.37  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.12/0.37  # 4 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.12/0.37  # 5 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.12/0.37  # 6 unit axiom clauses
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.12/0.37  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 4
% 0.12/0.37  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.12/0.37  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.12/0.37  # Returning from population with 17 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.12/0.37  # We now have 17 tableaux to operate on
% 0.12/0.37  # 1860 Satisfiable branch
% 0.12/0.37  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS status CounterSatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (grade_of(john)=f)).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_2, plain, (human(john))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (human(esk1_0))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (grade_of(esk1_0)=a)).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_6, plain, (a!=f)).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (~human(grade_of(X1)))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_10, negated_conjecture, (esk2_0=esk3_0|human(esk2_0))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_9, negated_conjecture, (esk2_0=esk3_0|human(esk3_0))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_8, negated_conjecture, (esk2_0=esk3_0|created_equal(esk2_0,esk3_0))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_11, negated_conjecture, (esk2_0!=esk3_0|~created_equal(esk2_0,esk3_0)|~human(esk2_0)|~human(esk3_0))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_1, plain, (created_equal(X1,X2)|~human(X2)|~human(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_204, plain, (X11=X11)).
% 0.12/0.37  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.37  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37  # Found 4 steps
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (grade_of(john)=f), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_211, plain, (grade_of(john)=f), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_208])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_251, plain, (human(f)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_1])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(i_0_262, plain, (~human(john)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_2])).
% 0.12/0.37  # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.37  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.37  # 1858 Satisfiable branch
% 0.12/0.37  # 1859 Satisfiable branch
% 0.12/0.37  # Child (1860) has found a proof.
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  # Proof search is over...
% 0.12/0.37  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------