%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : PUZ162_1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n014.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Tue May 5 06:49:41 PM UTC 2026 % Result : Theorem 8.57s 1.88s % Output : Proof 12.07s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.11 % Problem : PUZ162_1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0. % 0.00/0.12 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.16/0.33 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu % 0.16/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.16/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.16/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.16/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.16/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.16/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.16/0.33 % DateTime : Tue May 5 05:02:51 EDT 2026 % 0.16/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.57/0.55 ________ _____ % 0.57/0.55 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.57/0.55 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.57/0.55 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.57/0.55 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.57/0.55 % 0.57/0.55 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.57/0.55 (2023-06-19) % 0.57/0.55 % 0.57/0.55 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.57/0.55 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.57/0.55 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.57/0.55 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.57/0.55 % 0.57/0.55 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.57/0.55 % 0.57/0.56 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.57/0.57 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.57/0.58 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.57/0.58 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.57/0.58 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.57/0.58 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.57/0.58 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.57/0.58 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 0.57/0.58 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 2.92/1.07 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 2.92/1.07 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 2.92/1.11 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 2.92/1.11 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 2.92/1.11 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 2.92/1.11 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 2.92/1.11 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 4.84/1.30 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.84/1.31 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.57/1.43 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.57/1.44 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 6.35/1.52 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 7.09/1.61 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 7.85/1.70 Prover 3: gave up % 7.85/1.71 Prover 6: gave up % 7.85/1.72 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 7.85/1.72 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 7.85/1.79 Prover 0: Proving ... % 7.85/1.80 Prover 1: gave up % 8.57/1.80 Prover 9: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1423531889 % 8.57/1.80 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 8.57/1.82 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 8.57/1.85 Prover 9: Preprocessing ... % 8.57/1.86 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ... % 8.57/1.88 Prover 2: proved (1302ms) % 8.57/1.88 % 8.57/1.88 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 8.57/1.88 % 8.57/1.88 Prover 5: stopped % 8.57/1.88 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984 % 8.57/1.89 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 8.57/1.89 Prover 0: stopped % 8.57/1.89 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443 % 9.33/1.93 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 9.33/1.94 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 9.33/1.94 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 9.33/1.95 Prover 11: Preprocessing ... % 9.33/1.97 Prover 13: Preprocessing ... % 9.33/2.01 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ... % 10.21/2.03 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ... % 10.21/2.10 Prover 9: Constructing countermodel ... % 10.21/2.10 Prover 8: gave up % 10.21/2.10 Prover 16: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=completeFrugal -randomSeed=-2043353683 % 10.21/2.10 Prover 9: stopped % 11.01/2.13 Prover 19: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=-1780594085 % 11.01/2.15 Prover 16: Preprocessing ... % 11.01/2.16 Prover 10: Found proof (size 25) % 11.01/2.16 Prover 10: proved (274ms) % 11.01/2.16 Prover 7: stopped % 11.01/2.16 Prover 13: stopped % 11.01/2.16 Prover 4: stopped % 11.01/2.16 Prover 19: Preprocessing ... % 11.01/2.17 Prover 16: stopped % 11.01/2.18 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ... % 11.01/2.19 Prover 11: stopped % 11.58/2.24 Prover 19: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 11.58/2.25 Prover 19: Constructing countermodel ... % 11.58/2.26 Prover 19: stopped % 11.58/2.26 % 11.58/2.26 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 11.58/2.26 % 11.58/2.26 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 11.58/2.27 Assumptions after simplification: % 11.58/2.27 --------------------------------- % 11.58/2.27 % 11.58/2.27 (armistice1918_GS_ax3) % 11.58/2.27 table_side(cwlTableSideC) & event(armistice1918GermanSeating) & % 11.58/2.27 seatedAtSide(armistice1918GermanSeating, cwlTableSideC) % 11.58/2.27 % 11.58/2.27 (armistice1940_FS_ax0) % 11.58/2.27 event(armistice1940FrenchSeating) & seatingEvent(armistice1940FrenchSeating) % 11.58/2.27 % 11.58/2.27 (armistice1940_FS_ax1) % 11.58/2.27 event(armistice1940FrenchSeating) & event(armistice1940) & % 11.58/2.27 subEvents(armistice1940, armistice1940FrenchSeating) % 11.58/2.27 % 11.58/2.27 (armistice1940_FS_ax2) % 11.58/2.28 person(hutzinger) & event(armistice1940FrenchSeating) & % 11.58/2.28 performedBy(armistice1940FrenchSeating, hutzinger) % 11.58/2.28 % 11.58/2.28 (armistice1940_FS_ax3) % 11.58/2.28 table_side(cwlTableSideC) & event(armistice1940FrenchSeating) & % 11.58/2.28 seatedAtSide(armistice1940FrenchSeating, cwlTableSideC) % 11.58/2.28 % 11.58/2.28 (armistice1940_hutzinger) % 11.58/2.28 person(hutzinger) & govt(thirdRepublicFrench) & event(armistice1940) & % 11.58/2.28 govtRepresentedBy(armistice1940, thirdRepublicFrench, hutzinger) % 11.58/2.28 % 11.58/2.28 (armistice1940_typing) % 11.58/2.28 event(armistice1940) & armistice(armistice1940) % 11.58/2.28 % 11.58/2.28 (armistice1940_where) % 11.58/2.28 event(armistice1940) & geographicalRegion(rethondesCompiegne) & % 11.58/2.28 eventOccursAt(armistice1940, rethondesCompiegne) % 11.58/2.28 % 11.58/2.28 (armistice2018_past1940) % 11.58/2.28 event(compiegneVisit2018) & event(armistice1940) & % 11.58/2.28 endsBeforeStartOf(armistice1940, compiegneVisit2018) % 11.58/2.28 % 11.58/2.28 (armisticesAreContentious) % 11.58/2.28 ! [v0: event] : ( ~ event(v0) | ~ armistice(v0) | contentiousEvent(v0)) % 11.58/2.28 % 11.58/2.28 (armisticesAreDiplomatic) % 11.58/2.28 ! [v0: event] : ( ~ event(v0) | ~ armistice(v0) | diplomaticEvent(v0)) % 11.58/2.28 % 11.58/2.28 (compiegneVisit2018_friendly) % 11.58/2.28 event(compiegneVisit2018) & friendlyEvent(compiegneVisit2018) % 11.58/2.28 % 11.58/2.28 (compiegneVisit2018_macron) % 11.58/2.28 person(macron) & govt(fifthRepublicFrench) & event(compiegneVisit2018) & % 11.58/2.28 govtRepresentedBy(compiegneVisit2018, fifthRepublicFrench, macron) % 11.58/2.28 % 11.58/2.28 (compiegneVisit2018_where) % 11.58/2.28 event(compiegneVisit2018) & geographicalRegion(rethondesCompiegne) & % 11.58/2.28 eventOccursAt(compiegneVisit2018, rethondesCompiegne) % 11.58/2.28 % 11.58/2.28 (dontSitWherePastConflictSat) % 11.58/2.28 ! [v0: person] : ! [v1: person] : ! [v2: govt] : ! [v3: govt] : ! [v4: % 11.58/2.28 constrCont] : ! [v5: event] : ! [v6: event] : ! [v7: event] : ! [v8: % 11.58/2.29 table_side] : ( ~ table_side(v8) | ~ person(v1) | ~ person(v0) | ~ % 11.58/2.29 govt(v3) | ~ govt(v2) | ~ constrCont(v4) | ~ event(v7) | ~ event(v6) | % 11.58/2.29 ~ event(v5) | ~ pastColocatedDiplomaticEvent(v5, v6) | ~ seatedAtSide(v7, % 11.58/2.29 v8) | ~ govtRepresentedBy(v6, v2, v1) | ~ govtRepresentedBy(v5, v3, v0) % 11.58/2.29 | ~ performedBy(v7, v1) | ~ narrativeSuccessor(v4, v2, v3) | ~ % 11.58/2.29 friendlyEvent(v5) | ~ contentiousEvent(v6) | ~ subEvents(v6, v7) | ~ % 11.58/2.29 seatingEvent(v7) | avoidTableSide(v0, v5, v8)) % 11.58/2.29 % 11.58/2.29 (eventOccursAt_trans) % 11.58/2.29 ! [v0: geographicalRegion] : ! [v1: geographicalRegion] : ! [v2: event] : ( % 11.58/2.29 ~ event(v2) | ~ geographicalRegion(v1) | ~ geographicalRegion(v0) | ~ % 11.58/2.29 subRegions(v1, v0) | ~ eventOccursAt(v2, v0) | eventOccursAt(v2, v1)) % 11.58/2.29 % 11.58/2.29 (marianne_01) % 11.58/2.29 govt(thirdRepublicFrench) & govt(empireOfNapoleonIII) & constrCont(marianne) & % 11.58/2.29 narrativeSuccessor(marianne, empireOfNapoleonIII, thirdRepublicFrench) % 11.58/2.29 % 11.58/2.29 (marianne_02) % 11.58/2.29 govt(fourthRepublicFrench) & govt(thirdRepublicFrench) & constrCont(marianne) % 11.58/2.29 & narrativeSuccessor(marianne, thirdRepublicFrench, fourthRepublicFrench) % 11.58/2.29 % 11.58/2.29 (marianne_03) % 11.58/2.29 govt(fifthRepublicFrench) & govt(fourthRepublicFrench) & constrCont(marianne) % 11.58/2.29 & narrativeSuccessor(marianne, fourthRepublicFrench, fifthRepublicFrench) % 11.58/2.29 % 11.58/2.29 (narrativeSuccessor_ax) % 11.58/2.29 ! [v0: constrCont] : ! [v1: govt] : ! [v2: govt] : ! [v3: govt] : ( ~ % 11.58/2.29 govt(v3) | ~ govt(v2) | ~ govt(v1) | ~ constrCont(v0) | ~ % 11.58/2.29 narrativeSuccessor(v0, v3, v2) | ~ narrativeSuccessor(v0, v1, v3) | % 11.58/2.29 narrativeSuccessor(v0, v1, v2)) % 11.58/2.29 % 11.58/2.29 (pastColocatedDiplomaticEvent_rule) % 11.58/2.29 ! [v0: event] : ! [v1: event] : ! [v2: geographicalRegion] : ( ~ event(v1) % 11.58/2.29 | ~ event(v0) | ~ geographicalRegion(v2) | ~ eventOccursAt(v1, v2) | ~ % 11.58/2.29 eventOccursAt(v0, v2) | ~ endsBeforeStartOf(v0, v1) | ~ % 11.58/2.29 diplomaticEvent(v0) | pastColocatedDiplomaticEvent(v1, v0)) % 11.58/2.29 % 11.58/2.29 (rethondes_in_picardy) % 11.58/2.29 geographicalRegion(picardy) & geographicalRegion(rethondesCompiegne) & % 11.58/2.29 subRegions(picardy, rethondesCompiegne) % 11.58/2.29 % 11.58/2.29 (whereShouldMacronSit) % 11.58/2.29 table_side(cwlTableSideC) & person(macron) & event(compiegneVisit2018) & ~ % 11.58/2.29 avoidTableSide(macron, compiegneVisit2018, cwlTableSideC) % 11.58/2.29 % 11.58/2.29 Further assumptions not needed in the proof: % 11.58/2.29 -------------------------------------------- % 11.58/2.29 armistice1918_AS_ax0, armistice1918_AS_ax1, armistice1918_AS_ax2, % 11.58/2.29 armistice1918_AS_ax3, armistice1918_AS_ax4, armistice1918_GS_ax0, % 11.58/2.29 armistice1918_GS_ax1, armistice1918_GS_ax2, armistice1918_GS_ax4, % 11.58/2.29 armistice1918_french, armistice1918_german, armistice1918_typing, % 11.58/2.29 armistice1918_where, armistice1940_FS_ax4, armistice1940_GS_ax0, % 11.58/2.29 armistice1940_GS_ax1, armistice1940_GS_ax2, armistice1940_GS_ax3, % 11.58/2.29 armistice1940_GS_ax4, armistice1940_hitler, armistice1940_past1918, % 11.58/2.29 compiegneVisit2018_diplomatic, compiegneVisit2018_merkel, % 11.58/2.29 contentiousIsNotFriendly_ax, endsBeforeStartOf_trans, % 11.58/2.29 friendlyIsNotContentious_ax, germania_01, germania_02, germania_03, germania_04, % 11.58/2.29 hautsDeFranceInFrance, picardyInHautsDeFrance, subRegions_trans % 11.58/2.29 % 11.58/2.29 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 11.58/2.29 --------------------------------- % 11.58/2.29 % 11.58/2.29 Begin of proof % 11.58/2.29 | % 11.58/2.29 | ALPHA: (whereShouldMacronSit) implies: % 11.58/2.29 | (1) ~ avoidTableSide(macron, compiegneVisit2018, cwlTableSideC) % 11.58/2.29 | % 11.58/2.29 | ALPHA: (armistice2018_past1940) implies: % 11.58/2.29 | (2) endsBeforeStartOf(armistice1940, compiegneVisit2018) % 11.58/2.29 | % 11.58/2.29 | ALPHA: (compiegneVisit2018_macron) implies: % 11.58/2.30 | (3) govtRepresentedBy(compiegneVisit2018, fifthRepublicFrench, macron) % 11.58/2.30 | (4) person(macron) % 11.58/2.30 | % 11.58/2.30 | ALPHA: (compiegneVisit2018_friendly) implies: % 11.58/2.30 | (5) friendlyEvent(compiegneVisit2018) % 11.58/2.30 | % 11.58/2.30 | ALPHA: (compiegneVisit2018_where) implies: % 11.58/2.30 | (6) eventOccursAt(compiegneVisit2018, rethondesCompiegne) % 11.58/2.30 | (7) event(compiegneVisit2018) % 11.58/2.30 | % 11.58/2.30 | ALPHA: (armistice1940_FS_ax3) implies: % 12.07/2.30 | (8) seatedAtSide(armistice1940FrenchSeating, cwlTableSideC) % 12.07/2.30 | % 12.07/2.30 | ALPHA: (armistice1940_FS_ax2) implies: % 12.07/2.30 | (9) performedBy(armistice1940FrenchSeating, hutzinger) % 12.07/2.30 | % 12.07/2.30 | ALPHA: (armistice1940_FS_ax1) implies: % 12.07/2.30 | (10) subEvents(armistice1940, armistice1940FrenchSeating) % 12.07/2.30 | % 12.07/2.30 | ALPHA: (armistice1940_FS_ax0) implies: % 12.07/2.30 | (11) seatingEvent(armistice1940FrenchSeating) % 12.07/2.30 | (12) event(armistice1940FrenchSeating) % 12.07/2.30 | % 12.07/2.30 | ALPHA: (armistice1940_hutzinger) implies: % 12.07/2.30 | (13) govtRepresentedBy(armistice1940, thirdRepublicFrench, hutzinger) % 12.07/2.30 | (14) person(hutzinger) % 12.07/2.30 | % 12.07/2.30 | ALPHA: (armistice1940_where) implies: % 12.07/2.30 | (15) eventOccursAt(armistice1940, rethondesCompiegne) % 12.07/2.30 | % 12.07/2.30 | ALPHA: (armistice1940_typing) implies: % 12.07/2.30 | (16) armistice(armistice1940) % 12.07/2.30 | (17) event(armistice1940) % 12.07/2.30 | % 12.07/2.30 | ALPHA: (armistice1918_GS_ax3) implies: % 12.07/2.30 | (18) table_side(cwlTableSideC) % 12.07/2.30 | % 12.07/2.30 | ALPHA: (marianne_03) implies: % 12.07/2.30 | (19) narrativeSuccessor(marianne, fourthRepublicFrench, % 12.07/2.30 | fifthRepublicFrench) % 12.07/2.30 | (20) govt(fifthRepublicFrench) % 12.07/2.30 | % 12.07/2.30 | ALPHA: (marianne_02) implies: % 12.07/2.30 | (21) narrativeSuccessor(marianne, thirdRepublicFrench, % 12.07/2.30 | fourthRepublicFrench) % 12.07/2.30 | (22) govt(fourthRepublicFrench) % 12.07/2.30 | % 12.07/2.30 | ALPHA: (marianne_01) implies: % 12.07/2.30 | (23) constrCont(marianne) % 12.07/2.30 | (24) govt(thirdRepublicFrench) % 12.07/2.30 | % 12.07/2.30 | ALPHA: (rethondes_in_picardy) implies: % 12.07/2.30 | (25) subRegions(picardy, rethondesCompiegne) % 12.07/2.30 | (26) geographicalRegion(rethondesCompiegne) % 12.07/2.30 | (27) geographicalRegion(picardy) % 12.07/2.30 | % 12.07/2.30 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (armisticesAreContentious) with armistice1940, % 12.07/2.30 | simplifying with (16), (17) gives: % 12.07/2.30 | (28) contentiousEvent(armistice1940) % 12.07/2.30 | % 12.07/2.30 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (armisticesAreDiplomatic) with armistice1940, % 12.07/2.30 | simplifying with (16), (17) gives: % 12.07/2.30 | (29) diplomaticEvent(armistice1940) % 12.07/2.30 | % 12.07/2.30 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (eventOccursAt_trans) with rethondesCompiegne, % 12.07/2.30 | picardy, compiegneVisit2018, simplifying with (6), (7), (25), % 12.07/2.30 | (26), (27) gives: % 12.07/2.30 | (30) eventOccursAt(compiegneVisit2018, picardy) % 12.07/2.30 | % 12.07/2.30 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (eventOccursAt_trans) with rethondesCompiegne, % 12.07/2.30 | picardy, armistice1940, simplifying with (15), (17), (25), (26), % 12.07/2.30 | (27) gives: % 12.07/2.31 | (31) eventOccursAt(armistice1940, picardy) % 12.07/2.31 | % 12.07/2.31 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (narrativeSuccessor_ax) with marianne, % 12.07/2.31 | thirdRepublicFrench, fifthRepublicFrench, fourthRepublicFrench, % 12.07/2.31 | simplifying with (19), (20), (21), (22), (23), (24) gives: % 12.07/2.31 | (32) narrativeSuccessor(marianne, thirdRepublicFrench, fifthRepublicFrench) % 12.07/2.31 | % 12.07/2.31 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (pastColocatedDiplomaticEvent_rule) with % 12.07/2.31 | armistice1940, compiegneVisit2018, picardy, simplifying with (2), % 12.07/2.31 | (7), (17), (27), (29), (30), (31) gives: % 12.07/2.31 | (33) pastColocatedDiplomaticEvent(compiegneVisit2018, armistice1940) % 12.07/2.31 | % 12.07/2.31 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (dontSitWherePastConflictSat) with macron, % 12.07/2.31 | hutzinger, thirdRepublicFrench, fifthRepublicFrench, marianne, % 12.07/2.31 | compiegneVisit2018, armistice1940, armistice1940FrenchSeating, % 12.07/2.31 | cwlTableSideC, simplifying with (1), (3), (4), (5), (7), (8), % 12.07/2.31 | (9), (10), (11), (12), (13), (14), (17), (18), (20), (23), (24), % 12.07/2.31 | (28), (32), (33) gives: % 12.07/2.31 | (34) $false % 12.07/2.31 | % 12.07/2.31 | CLOSE: (34) is inconsistent. % 12.07/2.31 | % 12.07/2.31 End of proof % 12.07/2.31 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 12.07/2.31 % 12.07/2.31 1756ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------