↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : QUA002^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:21:21 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 11.52s 3.91s
% Output   : Refutation 11.52s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (  15 unt;   0 typ;   5 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   85 (  79 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   92 (  28   ~;  36   |;   3   &;  25   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    2 (   2   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (  19   ^;   7   !;   0   ?;  28   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   2  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(union_decl,type,
    union: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(singleton_decl,type,
    singleton: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(sup_decl,type,
    sup: ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(addition_decl,type,
    addition: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: $i ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: $i ).

thf(sk3_decl,type,
    sk3: $i ).

thf(union_def,definition,
    ( union
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $o,B: $i > $o,C: $i] :
          ( ( A @ C )
          | ( B @ C ) ) ) ) ).

thf(singleton_def,definition,
    ( singleton
    = ( ^ [A: $i,B: $i] : ( B = A ) ) ) ).

thf(addition_def,definition,
    ( addition
    = ( ^ [A: $i,B: $i] : ( sup @ ( union @ ( singleton @ A ) @ ( singleton @ B ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ~ ! [B: $i] :
              ( ( sup
                @ ^ [C: $i] :
                    ( ( C = A )
                    | ( C = B ) ) )
              = ( sup
                @ ^ [C: $i] :
                    ( ( C = B )
                    | ( C = A ) ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ( ( sup
            @ ^ [B: $i] :
                ( ( B = sk1 )
                | ( B = A ) ) )
         != ( sup
            @ ^ [B: $i] :
                ( ( B = A )
                | ( B = sk1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( addition @ A @ B )
      = ( addition @ B @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',addition_comm) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( addition @ A @ B )
        = ( addition @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( sup
          @ ^ [C: $i] :
              ( ( C = A )
              | ( C = B ) ) )
        = ( sup
          @ ^ [C: $i] :
              ( ( C = B )
              | ( C = A ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ( ( sup
      @ ^ [A: $i] :
          ( ( A = sk1 )
          | ( A = sk2 ) ) )
   != ( sup
      @ ^ [A: $i] :
          ( ( A = sk2 )
          | ( A = sk1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[10]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ( ( sup
      @ ^ [A: $i] :
          ( ( A = sk1 )
          | ( A = sk2 ) ) )
   != ( sup
      @ ^ [A: $i] :
          ( ( A = sk2 )
          | ( A = sk1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(50,plain,
    ( ( ^ [A: $i] :
          ( ( A = sk1 )
          | ( A = sk2 ) ) )
   != ( ^ [A: $i] :
          ( ( A = sk2 )
          | ( A = sk1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(68,plain,
    ( ( ( sk3 = sk1 )
      | ( sk3 = sk2 ) )
   != ( ( sk3 = sk2 )
      | ( sk3 = sk1 ) ) ),
    inference(func_ext,[status(esa)],[50]) ).

thf(305,plain,
    ( ( sk3 = sk1 )
    | ( sk3 = sk2 )
    | ( sk3 = sk2 )
    | ( sk3 = sk1 ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[68]) ).

thf(347,plain,
    ( ( sk3 = sk1 )
    | ( sk3 = sk2 )
    | ( sk3 = sk2 )
    | ( sk3 = sk1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[305]) ).

thf(348,plain,
    ( ( sk3 = sk1 )
    | ( sk3 = sk2 )
    | ( sk3 = sk2 )
    | ( sk3 = sk1 ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[347]) ).

thf(349,plain,
    ( ( sk3 = sk1 )
    | ( sk3 = sk2 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[348]) ).

thf(304,plain,
    ( ~ ( ( sk3 = sk1 )
        | ( sk3 = sk2 ) )
    | ~ ( ( sk3 = sk2 )
        | ( sk3 = sk1 ) ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[68]) ).

thf(338,plain,
    ( ( ( sk3 != sk1 )
      | ( sk3 != sk2 ) )
    & ( ( sk3 != sk1 )
      | ( sk3 != sk1 ) )
    & ( ( sk3 != sk2 )
      | ( sk3 != sk2 ) )
    & ( ( sk3 != sk2 )
      | ( sk3 != sk1 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[304]) ).

thf(340,plain,
    ( ( sk3 != sk1 )
    | ( sk3 != sk1 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[338]) ).

thf(343,plain,
    ( ( sk3 != sk1 )
    | ( sk3 != sk1 ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[340]) ).

thf(344,plain,
    sk3 != sk1,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[343]) ).

thf(341,plain,
    ( ( sk3 != sk2 )
    | ( sk3 != sk2 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[338]) ).

thf(345,plain,
    ( ( sk3 != sk2 )
    | ( sk3 != sk2 ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[341]) ).

thf(346,plain,
    sk3 != sk2,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[345]) ).

thf(353,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simplifyReflect,[status(thm)],[349,344,346]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : QUA002^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.11/0.21  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.21  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.21  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.21  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.21  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.21  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.21  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.21  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:29:26 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.22  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.22  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.90/0.79  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.25/1.01  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (216ms). 
% 1.25/1.03  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.17/1.41  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.17/1.42  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.34/1.54  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 7 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.34/1.57  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 7 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.34/1.59  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.34/1.59  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.34/1.60  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 11.52/3.90  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 11.52/3.90  % Time passed: 3547ms (effective reasoning time: 2867ms)
% 11.52/3.90  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 11.52/3.90  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 11.52/3.91  % No. of inferences in proof: 20
% 11.52/3.91  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 3547 ms resp. 2867 ms w/o parsing
% 11.52/3.95  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 11.52/3.95  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------