↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : REL001+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:03:47 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   47 (  47 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   47 (  46 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   65 (   0 sgn  36   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(converse_multiplicativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : converse(composition(X1,X2)) = composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_multiplicativity) ).

fof(converse_idempotence,axiom,
    ! [X1] : converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_idempotence) ).

fof(composition_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : composition(X1,one) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',composition_identity) ).

fof(converse_cancellativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : join(composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))),complement(X2)) = complement(X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_cancellativity) ).

fof(maddux1_join_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux1_join_commutativity) ).

fof(maddux4_definiton_of_meet,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : meet(X1,X2) = complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux4_definiton_of_meet) ).

fof(def_top,axiom,
    ! [X1] : top = join(X1,complement(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',def_top) ).

fof(def_zero,axiom,
    ! [X1] : zero = meet(X1,complement(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',def_zero) ).

fof(maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : X1 = join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X1),X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan) ).

fof(maddux2_join_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : join(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(join(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux2_join_associativity) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X1] : join(zero,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X27,X28] : converse(composition(X27,X28)) = composition(converse(X28),converse(X27)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_multiplicativity]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X29] : converse(converse(X29)) = X29,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_idempotence]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    converse(composition(X1,X2)) = composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X26] : composition(X26,one) = X26,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[composition_identity]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    converse(composition(converse(X1),X2)) = composition(converse(X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    composition(X1,one) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X19,X20] : join(composition(converse(X19),complement(composition(X19,X20))),complement(X20)) = complement(X20),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_cancellativity]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X5,X6] : join(X5,X6) = join(X6,X5),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux1_join_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    composition(converse(one),X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    join(composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))),complement(X2)) = complement(X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    converse(one) = one,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_20]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X12,X13] : meet(X12,X13) = complement(join(complement(X12),complement(X13))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux4_definiton_of_meet]) ).

fof(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X22] : top = join(X22,complement(X22)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[def_top]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X21] : zero = meet(X21,complement(X21)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[def_zero]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    join(complement(X1),composition(converse(X2),complement(composition(X2,X1)))) = complement(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    composition(one,X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    meet(X1,X2) = complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    top = join(X1,complement(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    zero = meet(X1,complement(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

fof(c_0_32,plain,
    ! [X10,X11] : X10 = join(complement(join(complement(X10),complement(X11))),complement(join(complement(X10),X11))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan]) ).

fof(c_0_33,plain,
    ! [X7,X8,X9] : join(X7,join(X8,X9)) = join(join(X7,X8),X9),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux2_join_associativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    join(complement(X1),complement(X1)) = complement(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_23]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    complement(top) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    X1 = join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X1),X2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

fof(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] : join(zero,X1) = X1,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(join(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    join(zero,zero) = zero,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    join(complement(join(complement(X1),X2)),meet(X1,X2)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_29]),c_0_22]) ).

fof(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    join(zero,esk1_0) != esk1_0,
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_37])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    join(zero,join(zero,X1)) = join(zero,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    join(zero,complement(complement(X1))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_31]),c_0_34]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    join(zero,esk1_0) != esk1_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    join(zero,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : REL001+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.34  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 03:57:40 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.35  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.41  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.41  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.41  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.41  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41  % sh5l with pid 4174952 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.41  % Result found by sh5l
% 0.12/0.41  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.41  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.41  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.12/0.41  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.12/0.41  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.41  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.41  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41  % SubtermCWHack with pid 4174953 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.41  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.12/0.41  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.41  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.41  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.12/0.41  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.12/0.41  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.41  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.41  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.41  
% 0.12/0.41  % Proof found!
% 0.12/0.41  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.41  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.41  % Parsed axioms                        : 14
% 0.12/0.41  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.12/0.41  % Initial clauses                      : 14
% 0.12/0.41  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.12/0.41  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 14
% 0.12/0.41  % Processed clauses                    : 81
% 0.12/0.41  % ...of these trivial                  : 20
% 0.12/0.41  % ...subsumed                          : 7
% 0.12/0.41  % ...remaining for further processing  : 54
% 0.12/0.41  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.12/0.41  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.12/0.41  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.12/0.41  % Backward-rewritten                   : 21
% 0.12/0.41  % Generated clauses                    : 364
% 0.12/0.41  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 248
% 0.12/0.41  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.12/0.41  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.12/0.41  % Paramodulations                      : 364
% 0.12/0.41  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.12/0.41  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.12/0.41  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.12/0.41  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.12/0.41  % Total rewrite steps                  : 409
% 0.12/0.41  % ...of those cached                   : 250
% 0.12/0.41  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.12/0.41  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.12/0.41  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.41  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.12/0.41  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.41  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.12/0.41  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.12/0.41  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.12/0.41  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.12/0.41  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.12/0.41  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.12/0.41  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.12/0.41  % Current number of processed clauses  : 33
% 0.12/0.42  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 31
% 0.12/0.42  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.12/0.42  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.12/0.42  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 174
% 0.12/0.42  % ...number of literals in the above   : 174
% 0.12/0.42  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Current number of archived clauses   : 21
% 0.12/0.42  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 34
% 0.12/0.42  % BW rewrite match successes           : 27
% 0.12/0.42  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 3760
% 0.12/0.42  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 9
% 0.12/0.42  
% 0.12/0.42  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.42  % User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.12/0.42  % System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.42  % Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.12/0.42  % Maximum resident set size: 3648 pages
% 0.12/0.42  
% 0.12/0.42  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.42  % User time                : 0.012 s
% 0.12/0.42  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.12/0.42  % Total time               : 0.015 s
% 0.12/0.42  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.12/0.42  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------