↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : REL003+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:04:09 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.25s 1.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   39 (  38 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   30 (  11   ~;  10   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (   0 sgn  14   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( join(X1,X2) = X2
       => join(converse(X1),converse(X2)) = converse(X2) )
      & ( join(converse(X1),converse(X2)) = converse(X2)
       => join(X1,X2) = X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(maddux1_join_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux1_join_commutativity) ).

fof(converse_additivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : converse(join(X1,X2)) = join(converse(X1),converse(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_additivity) ).

fof(converse_idempotence,axiom,
    ! [X1] : converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_idempotence) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( ( join(X1,X2) = X2
         => join(converse(X1),converse(X2)) = converse(X2) )
        & ( join(converse(X1),converse(X2)) = converse(X2)
         => join(X1,X2) = X2 ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( join(converse(esk1_0),converse(esk2_0)) = converse(esk2_0)
      | join(esk1_0,esk2_0) = esk2_0 )
    & ( join(esk1_0,esk2_0) != esk2_0
      | join(esk1_0,esk2_0) = esk2_0 )
    & ( join(converse(esk1_0),converse(esk2_0)) = converse(esk2_0)
      | join(converse(esk1_0),converse(esk2_0)) != converse(esk2_0) )
    & ( join(esk1_0,esk2_0) != esk2_0
      | join(converse(esk1_0),converse(esk2_0)) != converse(esk2_0) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X31,X32] : join(X31,X32) = join(X32,X31),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux1_join_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(converse(esk1_0),converse(esk2_0)) = converse(esk2_0)
    | join(esk1_0,esk2_0) = esk2_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X48,X49] : converse(join(X48,X49)) = join(converse(X48),converse(X49)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_additivity]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(esk1_0,esk2_0) != esk2_0
    | join(converse(esk1_0),converse(esk2_0)) != converse(esk2_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X47] : converse(converse(X47)) = X47,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_idempotence]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(converse(esk2_0),converse(esk1_0)) = converse(esk2_0)
    | join(esk2_0,esk1_0) = esk2_0 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    converse(join(X1,X2)) = join(converse(X1),converse(X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(converse(esk2_0),converse(esk1_0)) != converse(esk2_0)
    | join(esk2_0,esk1_0) != esk2_0 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( converse(join(esk2_0,esk1_0)) = converse(esk2_0)
    | join(esk2_0,esk1_0) = esk2_0 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( converse(join(esk2_0,esk1_0)) != converse(esk2_0)
    | join(esk2_0,esk1_0) != esk2_0 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    join(esk2_0,esk1_0) = esk2_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_18])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : REL003+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 01:42:33 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.25/1.71  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.25/1.71  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.71  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.25/1.71  % Total time : 1.372s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------