↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : REL006+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:03:49 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 5.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   19
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   80 (  77 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   83 (  82 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    6 (   3   ~;   0   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  108 (   9 sgn  42   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(converse_multiplicativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : converse(composition(X1,X2)) = composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_multiplicativity) ).

fof(converse_idempotence,axiom,
    ! [X1] : converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_idempotence) ).

fof(composition_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : composition(X1,one) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',composition_identity) ).

fof(converse_cancellativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : join(composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))),complement(X2)) = complement(X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_cancellativity) ).

fof(maddux1_join_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux1_join_commutativity) ).

fof(maddux4_definiton_of_meet,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : meet(X1,X2) = complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux4_definiton_of_meet) ).

fof(def_top,axiom,
    ! [X1] : top = join(X1,complement(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',def_top) ).

fof(def_zero,axiom,
    ! [X1] : zero = meet(X1,complement(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',def_zero) ).

fof(maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : X1 = join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X1),X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan) ).

fof(maddux2_join_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : join(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(join(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux2_join_associativity) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( meet(converse(X1),X2) = zero
     => meet(X1,converse(X2)) = zero ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(converse_additivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : converse(join(X1,X2)) = join(converse(X1),converse(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_additivity) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X12,X13] : converse(composition(X12,X13)) = composition(converse(X13),converse(X12)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_multiplicativity]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X9] : converse(converse(X9)) = X9,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_idempotence]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    converse(composition(X1,X2)) = composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X30] : composition(X30,one) = X30,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[composition_identity]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    converse(composition(converse(X1),X2)) = composition(converse(X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    composition(X1,one) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X14,X15] : join(composition(converse(X14),complement(composition(X14,X15))),complement(X15)) = complement(X15),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_cancellativity]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X19,X20] : join(X19,X20) = join(X20,X19),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux1_join_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    composition(converse(one),X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    join(composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))),complement(X2)) = complement(X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    converse(one) = one,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_21]) ).

fof(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X7,X8] : meet(X7,X8) = complement(join(complement(X7),complement(X8))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux4_definiton_of_meet]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X18] : top = join(X18,complement(X18)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[def_top]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X6] : zero = meet(X6,complement(X6)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[def_zero]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    join(complement(X1),composition(converse(X2),complement(composition(X2,X1)))) = complement(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    composition(one,X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    meet(X1,X2) = complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    top = join(X1,complement(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    zero = meet(X1,complement(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

fof(c_0_33,plain,
    ! [X16,X17] : X16 = join(complement(join(complement(X16),complement(X17))),complement(join(complement(X16),X17))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan]) ).

fof(c_0_34,plain,
    ! [X21,X22,X23] : join(X21,join(X22,X23)) = join(join(X21,X22),X23),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux2_join_associativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    join(complement(X1),complement(X1)) = complement(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_24]),c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    complement(top) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    X1 = join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X1),X2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).

fof(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( meet(converse(X1),X2) = zero
       => meet(X1,converse(X2)) = zero ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(join(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    join(zero,zero) = zero,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    join(complement(join(complement(X1),X2)),meet(X1,X2)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_30]),c_0_23]) ).

fof(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ( meet(esk1_0,converse(esk2_0)) != zero
    & meet(converse(esk1_0),esk2_0) = zero ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_38])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    join(zero,join(zero,X1)) = join(zero,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    join(zero,complement(complement(X1))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_32]),c_0_35]),c_0_23]) ).

fof(c_0_45,plain,
    ! [X10,X11] : converse(join(X10,X11)) = join(converse(X10),converse(X11)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_additivity]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,complement(join(X1,X2)))) = top,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    meet(converse(esk1_0),esk2_0) = zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    meet(X1,X2) = meet(X2,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_23]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    join(zero,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    converse(join(X1,X2)) = join(converse(X1),converse(X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    join(top,complement(X1)) = top,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_35]),c_0_31]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    meet(esk2_0,converse(esk1_0)) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    join(X1,zero) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    complement(complement(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    join(converse(X1),join(converse(X2),X3)) = join(converse(join(X1,X2)),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_50]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    join(X1,top) = top,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_51]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    complement(join(complement(esk2_0),converse(esk1_0))) = esk2_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_52]),c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    converse(join(converse(X1),X2)) = join(X1,converse(X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(X3,join(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,plain,
    join(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_54]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,plain,
    join(complement(converse(X1)),converse(join(X2,X1))) = top,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_31]),c_0_56]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
    join(complement(esk2_0),converse(esk1_0)) = complement(esk2_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_57]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,plain,
    join(X1,converse(complement(converse(X1)))) = converse(top),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_64,plain,
    join(top,X1) = top,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_56]) ).

cnf(c_0_65,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,X1)) = join(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_60]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,plain,
    converse(join(X1,converse(X2))) = join(converse(X1),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_67,negated_conjecture,
    join(complement(esk1_0),converse(complement(esk2_0))) = top,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_62]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_68,plain,
    converse(top) = top,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_64]) ).

cnf(c_0_69,plain,
    join(X1,join(complement(X1),X2)) = top,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_31]),c_0_56]) ).

cnf(c_0_70,plain,
    join(X1,meet(X1,X2)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_65,c_0_41]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_71,negated_conjecture,
    join(complement(esk2_0),converse(complement(esk1_0))) = top,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_66,c_0_67]),c_0_68]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_72,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,complement(X1))) = top,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_54]),c_0_59]) ).

cnf(c_0_73,plain,
    join(X1,meet(X2,X1)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_70,c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_74,negated_conjecture,
    meet(esk2_0,converse(complement(esk1_0))) = esk2_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_71]),c_0_36]),c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_75,plain,
    join(complement(converse(X1)),converse(join(X1,X2))) = top,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_72,c_0_55]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_76,negated_conjecture,
    join(esk2_0,converse(complement(esk1_0))) = converse(complement(esk1_0)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_74]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_77,negated_conjecture,
    join(complement(esk1_0),complement(converse(esk2_0))) = top,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_75,c_0_76]),c_0_15]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_78,negated_conjecture,
    meet(esk1_0,converse(esk2_0)) != zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_79,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_77]),c_0_36]),c_0_78]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : REL006+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/5.43  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.16/5.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/5.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/5.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/5.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/5.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/5.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/5.43  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 03:57:47 UTC 2026
% 0.16/5.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/5.44  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.21/5.50  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/5.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/5.60  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.21/5.60  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/5.60  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/5.60  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/5.60  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.60  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.60  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.60  % sh5l with pid 1964427 completed with status 0
% 0.21/5.60  % Result found by sh5l
% 0.21/5.60  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/5.60  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/5.60  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/5.60  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.60  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.60  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.60  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.21/5.60  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/5.60  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/5.60  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/5.60  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.60  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1964435 completed with status 0
% 0.21/5.60  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.21/5.60  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/5.60  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/5.60  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/5.60  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.60  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.60  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.60  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.21/5.60  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/5.60  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/5.60  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/5.60  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.60  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.21/5.60  
% 0.21/5.60  % Proof found!
% 0.21/5.60  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/5.60  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/5.60  % Parsed axioms                        : 14
% 0.21/5.60  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.21/5.60  % Initial clauses                      : 15
% 0.21/5.60  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.21/5.60  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 15
% 0.21/5.60  % Processed clauses                    : 336
% 0.21/5.60  % ...of these trivial                  : 166
% 0.21/5.60  % ...subsumed                          : 26
% 0.21/5.60  % ...remaining for further processing  : 144
% 0.21/5.60  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/5.60  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/5.60  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/5.60  % Backward-rewritten                   : 28
% 0.21/5.60  % Generated clauses                    : 3733
% 0.21/5.60  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1793
% 0.21/5.60  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/5.60  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/5.60  % Paramodulations                      : 3733
% 0.21/5.60  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/5.60  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/5.60  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/5.60  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.21/5.60  % Total rewrite steps                  : 5423
% 0.21/5.60  % ...of those cached                   : 4114
% 0.21/5.60  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/5.60  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/5.60  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/5.60  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/5.60  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/5.60  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/5.60  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/5.60  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/5.60  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/5.60  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/5.60  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/5.60  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/5.60  % Current number of processed clauses  : 116
% 0.21/5.60  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 111
% 0.21/5.60  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 0.21/5.60  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.21/5.60  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.21/5.60  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1443
% 0.21/5.60  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1443
% 0.21/5.60  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/5.60  % Current number of archived clauses   : 28
% 0.21/5.60  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/5.60  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/5.60  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.21/5.60  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.21/5.60  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/5.60  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 163
% 0.21/5.60  % BW rewrite match successes           : 63
% 0.21/5.60  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/5.60  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/5.60  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 32453
% 0.21/5.60  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 28
% 0.21/5.60  
% 0.21/5.60  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/5.60  % User time                : 0.057 s
% 0.21/5.60  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.21/5.60  % Total time               : 0.061 s
% 0.21/5.60  % Maximum resident set size: 3648 pages
% 0.21/5.60  
% 0.21/5.60  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/5.60  % User time                : 0.059 s
% 0.21/5.60  % System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.21/5.60  % Total time               : 0.070 s
% 0.21/5.60  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.21/5.60  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------