↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : REL008-3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:04:12 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 9.55s 6.16s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 9.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   18 (  18 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   18 (  17 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(converse_multiplicativity_10,axiom,
    converse(composition(X1,X2)) = composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',converse_multiplicativity_10) ).

cnf(converse_idempotence_8,axiom,
    converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',converse_idempotence_8) ).

cnf(converse_additivity_9,axiom,
    converse(join(X1,X2)) = join(converse(X1),converse(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',converse_additivity_9) ).

cnf(composition_distributivity_7,axiom,
    composition(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(composition(X1,X3),composition(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',composition_distributivity_7) ).

cnf(goals_17,negated_conjecture,
    composition(sk1,join(sk2,sk3)) != join(composition(sk1,sk2),composition(sk1,sk3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals_17) ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    converse(composition(X1,X2)) = composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),
    converse_multiplicativity_10 ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    converse_idempotence_8 ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    converse(join(X1,X2)) = join(converse(X1),converse(X2)),
    converse_additivity_9 ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    converse(composition(X1,converse(X2))) = composition(X2,converse(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    converse(join(converse(X1),X2)) = join(X1,converse(X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    composition(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(composition(X1,X3),composition(X2,X3)),
    composition_distributivity_7 ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    join(composition(X1,converse(X2)),converse(X3)) = converse(join(composition(X2,converse(X1)),X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    composition(join(X1,converse(X2)),converse(X3)) = converse(composition(X3,join(converse(X1),X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    converse(join(composition(X1,converse(X2)),composition(X1,X3))) = converse(composition(X1,join(converse(X2),X3))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_5]),c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    join(composition(X1,converse(X2)),composition(X1,X3)) = composition(X1,join(converse(X2),X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_13]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    composition(sk1,join(sk2,sk3)) != join(composition(sk1,sk2),composition(sk1,sk3)),
    goals_17 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    join(composition(X1,X2),composition(X1,X3)) = composition(X1,join(X2,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : REL008-3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 01:40:06 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 9.55/6.16  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 9.55/6.16  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 9.55/6.16  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 9.55/6.16  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.62/6.20  % Total time : 4.369s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------