%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : REL009-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:23:53 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 6.01s 3.30s
% Output : Refutation 6.01s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 18
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 37 ( 35 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 39 ( 38 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 362 ( 4 ~; 2 |; 0 &; 356 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 13 ( 11 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 68 ( 0 ^; 68 !; 0 ?; 68 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(join_decl,type,
join: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(sk1_decl,type,
sk1: $i ).
thf(sk2_decl,type,
sk2: $i ).
thf(composition_decl,type,
composition: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(sk3_decl,type,
sk3: $i ).
thf(zero_decl,type,
zero: $i ).
thf(meet_decl,type,
meet: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(complement_decl,type,
complement: $i > $i ).
thf(converse_decl,type,
converse: $i > $i ).
thf(one_decl,type,
one: $i ).
thf(top_decl,type,
top: $i ).
thf(17,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C @ ( B @ join ) @ ( A @ join ) )
= ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ join ) @ join ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',maddux2_join_associativity_2) ).
thf(52,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C @ ( B @ join ) @ ( A @ join ) )
= ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ join ) @ join ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).
thf(13,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C @ ( A @ converse @ composition ) @ ( B @ meet ) @ ( B @ converse @ ( C @ composition ) @ ( A @ meet ) @ composition ) @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ composition ) @ meet ) @ join ) )
= ( C @ ( A @ converse @ composition ) @ ( B @ meet ) @ ( B @ converse @ ( C @ composition ) @ ( A @ meet ) @ composition ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dedekind_law_14) ).
thf(44,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C @ ( A @ converse @ composition ) @ ( B @ meet ) @ ( B @ converse @ ( C @ composition ) @ ( A @ meet ) @ composition ) @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ composition ) @ meet ) @ join ) )
= ( C @ ( A @ converse @ composition ) @ ( B @ meet ) @ ( B @ converse @ ( C @ composition ) @ ( A @ meet ) @ composition ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
thf(18,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C @ ( B @ ( B @ converse @ ( C @ composition ) @ ( A @ meet ) @ composition ) @ meet ) @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ composition ) @ meet ) @ join ) )
= ( C @ ( B @ ( B @ converse @ ( C @ composition ) @ ( A @ meet ) @ composition ) @ meet ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',modular_law_2_16) ).
thf(54,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C @ ( B @ ( B @ converse @ ( C @ composition ) @ ( A @ meet ) @ composition ) @ meet ) @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ composition ) @ meet ) @ join ) )
= ( C @ ( B @ ( B @ converse @ ( C @ composition ) @ ( A @ meet ) @ composition ) @ meet ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).
thf(15,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( B @ complement @ ( B @ ( A @ composition ) @ complement @ ( A @ converse @ composition ) @ join ) )
= ( B @ complement ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',converse_cancellativity_11) ).
thf(48,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( B @ complement @ ( B @ ( A @ composition ) @ complement @ ( A @ converse @ composition ) @ join ) )
= ( B @ complement ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
thf(16,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C @ ( C @ ( A @ converse @ composition ) @ ( B @ meet ) @ ( A @ composition ) @ meet ) @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ composition ) @ meet ) @ join ) )
= ( C @ ( C @ ( A @ converse @ composition ) @ ( B @ meet ) @ ( A @ composition ) @ meet ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',modular_law_1_15) ).
thf(50,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C @ ( C @ ( A @ converse @ composition ) @ ( B @ meet ) @ ( A @ composition ) @ meet ) @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ composition ) @ meet ) @ join ) )
= ( C @ ( C @ ( A @ converse @ composition ) @ ( B @ meet ) @ ( A @ composition ) @ meet ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).
thf(12,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ join ) @ converse )
= ( B @ converse @ ( A @ converse @ join ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',converse_additivity_9) ).
thf(42,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ join ) @ converse )
= ( B @ converse @ ( A @ converse @ join ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( zero
= ( A @ complement @ ( A @ meet ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',def_zero_13) ).
thf(24,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( zero
= ( A @ complement @ ( A @ meet ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
( ( ( sk2 @ ( sk3 @ composition ) @ ( sk1 @ ( sk3 @ composition ) @ join ) )
!= ( sk2 @ ( sk3 @ composition ) ) )
| ( ( sk3 @ ( sk2 @ composition ) @ ( sk3 @ ( sk1 @ composition ) @ join ) )
!= ( sk3 @ ( sk2 @ composition ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals_18) ).
thf(20,plain,
( ( ( sk2 @ ( sk3 @ composition ) @ ( sk1 @ ( sk3 @ composition ) @ join ) )
!= ( sk2 @ ( sk3 @ composition ) ) )
| ( ( sk3 @ ( sk2 @ composition ) @ ( sk3 @ ( sk1 @ composition ) @ join ) )
!= ( sk3 @ ( sk2 @ composition ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(14,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( top
= ( A @ complement @ ( A @ join ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',def_top_12) ).
thf(46,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( top
= ( A @ complement @ ( A @ join ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ join ) @ composition ) )
= ( C @ ( B @ composition ) @ ( C @ ( A @ composition ) @ join ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',composition_distributivity_7) ).
thf(28,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ join ) @ composition ) )
= ( C @ ( B @ composition ) @ ( C @ ( A @ composition ) @ join ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C @ ( B @ composition ) @ ( A @ composition ) )
= ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ composition ) @ composition ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',composition_associativity_5) ).
thf(38,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( C @ ( B @ composition ) @ ( A @ composition ) )
= ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ composition ) @ composition ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( A
= ( B @ ( A @ complement @ join ) @ complement @ ( B @ complement @ ( A @ complement @ join ) @ complement @ join ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan_3) ).
thf(32,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( A
= ( B @ ( A @ complement @ join ) @ complement @ ( B @ complement @ ( A @ complement @ join ) @ complement @ join ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ composition ) @ converse )
= ( A @ converse @ ( B @ converse @ composition ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',converse_multiplicativity_10) ).
thf(34,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ composition ) @ converse )
= ( A @ converse @ ( B @ converse @ composition ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(11,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ meet ) )
= ( B @ complement @ ( A @ complement @ join ) @ complement ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',maddux4_definiton_of_meet_4) ).
thf(40,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ meet ) )
= ( B @ complement @ ( A @ complement @ join ) @ complement ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ converse @ converse )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',converse_idempotence_8) ).
thf(26,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ converse @ converse )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ join ) )
= ( A @ ( B @ join ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',maddux1_join_commutativity_1) ).
thf(36,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ join ) )
= ( A @ ( B @ join ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( one @ ( A @ composition ) )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',composition_identity_6) ).
thf(30,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( one @ ( A @ composition ) )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(1,negated_conjecture,
( ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ join ) )
= sk2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals_17) ).
thf(19,plain,
( ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ join ) )
= sk2 ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).
thf(83,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[52,44,54,48,50,42,24,20,46,28,38,32,34,40,26,36,30,19]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : REL009-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.13/0.42 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.42 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.42 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.42 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.42 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.42 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.42 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.42 % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 05:26:45 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.42 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.42 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.18/1.09 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.60/1.39 % [INFO] Parsing done (298ms).
% 1.84/1.42 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 2.67/2.04 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 2.96/2.06 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 3.20/2.20 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 16 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 3.20/2.29 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 16 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 3.39/2.34 % [INFO] Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF).
% 3.39/2.35 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 3.39/2.36 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 5.38/3.30 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 5.38/3.30 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 6.01/3.30 % Time passed: 2725ms (effective reasoning time: 1870ms)
% 6.01/3.30 % Axioms used in derivation (16): maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan_3, converse_idempotence_8, def_top_12, converse_cancellativity_11, composition_associativity_5, maddux2_join_associativity_2, composition_distributivity_7, maddux1_join_commutativity_1, modular_law_1_15, composition_identity_6, maddux4_definiton_of_meet_4, converse_additivity_9, dedekind_law_14, modular_law_2_16, def_zero_13, converse_multiplicativity_10
% 6.01/3.30 % No. of inferences in proof: 37
% 6.01/3.30 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2725 ms resp. 1870 ms w/o parsing
% 6.01/3.35 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 6.01/3.35 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------