↑ Up

FindProof---0.1.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : FindProof---0.1
% Problem  : REL014+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:34:43 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.45s 0.85s
% Output   : Proof 3.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   18
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (  35 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   45 (  44 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   16 (  11   ~;   3   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   43 (   2 sgn  14   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : converse(composition(X0,X1)) = composition(converse(X1),converse(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',converse_multiplicativity) ).

fof(f9_nnf,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : converse(composition(X0,X1)) = composition(converse(X1),converse(X0)),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

fof(f9_sk,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : converse(composition(X0,X1)) = composition(converse(X1),converse(X0)),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa)],[f9_nnf]) ).

cnf(c9,plain,
    converse(composition(X0,X1)) = composition(converse(X1),converse(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f9_sk]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    composition(converse(X1),converse(X2)) = converse(composition(X2,X1)),
    inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c9]) ).

cnf(t46,plain,
    composition(converse(X1),converse(X2)) = converse(composition(X2,X1)),
    inference(orient,[status(thm)],[t7]) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0] : converse(converse(X0)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',converse_idempotence) ).

fof(f7_nnf,plain,
    ! [X0] : converse(converse(X0)) = X0,
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

fof(f7_sk,plain,
    ! [X0] : converse(converse(X0)) = X0,
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa)],[f7_nnf]) ).

cnf(c7,plain,
    converse(converse(X0)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f7_sk]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c7]) ).

cnf(t19,plain,
    converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(orient,[status(thm)],[t1]) ).

cnf(t48,plain,
    converse(composition(converse(X1),X2)) = composition(converse(X2),X1),
    inference(cp,[status(thm)],[t46,t19]) ).

cnf(t131,plain,
    converse(composition(converse(X1),X2)) = composition(converse(X2),X1),
    inference(orient,[status(thm)],[t48]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0] : composition(X0,one) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',composition_identity) ).

fof(f5_nnf,plain,
    ! [X0] : composition(X0,one) = X0,
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

fof(f5_sk,plain,
    ! [X0] : composition(X0,one) = X0,
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa)],[f5_nnf]) ).

cnf(c5,plain,
    composition(X0,one) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f5_sk]) ).

cnf(t0,plain,
    composition(X1,one) = X1,
    inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c5]) ).

cnf(t18,plain,
    composition(X1,one) = X1,
    inference(orient,[status(thm)],[t0]) ).

cnf(t132,plain,
    composition(converse(one),X1) = converse(converse(X1)),
    inference(cp,[status(thm)],[t131,t18]) ).

cnf(t176,plain,
    composition(converse(one),X1) = X1,
    inference(step,[status(thm)],[t132,t19]) ).

cnf(t146,plain,
    composition(converse(one),X1) = X1,
    inference(orient,[status(thm)],[t176]) ).

cnf(t147,plain,
    one = converse(one),
    inference(cp,[status(thm)],[t146,t18]) ).

cnf(t153,plain,
    converse(one) = one,
    inference(orient,[status(thm)],[t147]) ).

cnf(t177,plain,
    composition(one,X1) = X1,
    inference(step,[status(thm)],[t146,t153]) ).

cnf(t163,plain,
    composition(one,X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[t177]) ).

cnf(t164,plain,
    composition(one,X1) = X1,
    inference(orient,[status(thm)],[t163]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
    introduced(definition) ).

cnf(t20,plain,
    ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
    inference(orient,[status(thm)],[t4]) ).

fof(f13,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( composition(one,X0) = X0
      & composition(X0,one) = X0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(f13_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( composition(one,X0) = X0
        & composition(X0,one) = X0 ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f13]) ).

fof(f13_nnf,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( composition(one,X0) != X0
      | composition(X0,one) != X0 ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f13_neg]) ).

fof(f13_sk,plain,
    ( composition(one,sk0) != sk0
    | composition(sk0,one) != sk0 ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sk0])],[f13_nnf]) ).

cnf(c13,plain,
    ( composition(one,sk0) != sk0
    | composition(sk0,one) != sk0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f13_sk]) ).

cnf(goal_0,negated_conjecture,
    true != false,
    inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c13]) ).

cnf(g0_0,plain,
    true != ifeq(composition(one,sk0),sk0,false,true),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[goal_0]) ).

cnf(g0_1,plain,
    true != ifeq(sk0,sk0,false,true),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[g0_0,t164]) ).

cnf(g0_2,plain,
    true != false,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[g0_1,t20]) ).

cnf(contradiction_0,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[g0_2]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : REL014+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 07:17:42 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.36  Running run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.45/0.85  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.45/0.85  % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------