↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : REL014+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:24:49 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   27 (  26 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   16 (  10   ~;   4   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0 sgn   6   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(composition_identity,axiom,
    ! [X0] : composition(X0,one) = X0,
    file('theBenchmark.p',composition_identity) ).

fof(converse_idempotence,axiom,
    ! [X0] : converse(converse(X0)) = X0,
    file('theBenchmark.p',converse_idempotence) ).

fof(converse_multiplicativity,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : converse(composition(X0,X1)) = composition(converse(X1),converse(X0)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',converse_multiplicativity) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( composition(one,X0) = X0
      & composition(X0,one) = X0 ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(goals_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( composition(one,X0) = X0
        & composition(X0,one) = X0 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

cnf(c_21,plain,
    composition(A,one) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[composition_identity]) ).

cnf(c_23,plain,
    converse(converse(A)) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[converse_idempotence]) ).

cnf(c_25,plain,
    converse(composition(A,B)) = composition(converse(B),converse(A)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[converse_multiplicativity]) ).

fof(nnf_14,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( composition(one,X0) != X0
      | composition(X0,one) != X0 ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[goals_neg]) ).

fof(sk_goals_neg,plain,
    ( composition(one,sK0) != sK0
    | composition(sK0,one) != sK0 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X0,sK0)],[nnf_14]) ).

cnf(c_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( composition(one,sK0) != sK0
    | composition(sK0,one) != sK0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_goals_neg]) ).

cnf(c_110,negated_conjecture,
    ( composition(one,sK0) != sK0
    | sK0 != sK0 ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_21,c_31]) ).

cnf(c_32,negated_conjecture,
    composition(one,sK0) != sK0,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_110]) ).

cnf(c_111,plain,
    converse(A) = composition(converse(one),converse(A)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_21,c_25]) ).

cnf(c_43,plain,
    composition(converse(one),converse(A)) = converse(A),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_111]) ).

cnf(c_112,plain,
    composition(converse(one),A) = converse(converse(A)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_23,c_43]) ).

cnf(c_101,plain,
    composition(converse(one),A) = A,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_23,c_112]) ).

cnf(c_113,plain,
    one = converse(one),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_101,c_21]) ).

cnf(c_103,plain,
    converse(one) = one,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_113]) ).

cnf(c_108,plain,
    composition(one,A) = A,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_103,c_101]) ).

cnf(c_109,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_108,c_32]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : REL014+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 05:30:25 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.08/0.36  % Process 181568 was started by sandbox on n026,
% 0.08/0.36  % Sat Sep 26 05:30:25 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.08/0.37  
% 0.08/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.14/0.38  % Length of proof is 14.
% 0.14/0.38  % Level of proof is 6.
% 0.14/0.38  % Maximum clause weight is 25.000.
% 0.14/0.38  % Given clauses 20.
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------