%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : REL014+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.mYCH5QwKro true
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:49:58 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Theorem 0.55s 0.81s
% Output : Refutation 0.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 21 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 29 ( 28 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 102 ( 7 ~; 2 |; 2 &; 91 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 6 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 0 ^; 28 !; 0 ?; 28 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(converse_type,type,
converse: $i > $i ).
thf(sk__type,type,
sk_: $i ).
thf(composition_type,type,
composition: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(one_type,type,
one: $i ).
thf(goals,conjecture,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( ( composition @ one @ X0 )
= X0 )
& ( ( composition @ X0 @ one )
= X0 ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0: $i] :
( ( ( composition @ one @ X0 )
= X0 )
& ( ( composition @ X0 @ one )
= X0 ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[goals]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl13,plain,
( ( ( composition @ one @ sk_ )
!= sk_ )
| ( ( composition @ sk_ @ one )
!= sk_ ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(composition_identity,axiom,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( composition @ X0 @ one )
= X0 ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl5,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( composition @ X0 @ one )
= X0 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[composition_identity]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl16,plain,
( ( ( composition @ one @ sk_ )
!= sk_ )
| ( sk_ != sk_ ) ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl13,zip_derived_cl5]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl17,plain,
( ( composition @ one @ sk_ )
!= sk_ ),
inference(simplify,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl16]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl5_001,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( composition @ X0 @ one )
= X0 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[composition_identity]) ).
thf(converse_idempotence,axiom,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( converse @ ( converse @ X0 ) )
= X0 ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl7,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( converse @ ( converse @ X0 ) )
= X0 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[converse_idempotence]) ).
thf(converse_multiplicativity,axiom,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( converse @ ( composition @ X0 @ X1 ) )
= ( composition @ ( converse @ X1 ) @ ( converse @ X0 ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl9,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( converse @ ( composition @ X1 @ X0 ) )
= ( composition @ ( converse @ X0 ) @ ( converse @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[converse_multiplicativity]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl78,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( converse @ ( composition @ ( converse @ X0 ) @ X1 ) )
= ( composition @ ( converse @ X1 ) @ X0 ) ),
inference('s_sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl7,zip_derived_cl9]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl85,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( converse @ ( converse @ X0 ) )
= ( composition @ ( converse @ one ) @ X0 ) ),
inference('s_sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl5,zip_derived_cl78]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl7_002,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( converse @ ( converse @ X0 ) )
= X0 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[converse_idempotence]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl90,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( X0
= ( composition @ ( converse @ one ) @ X0 ) ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl85,zip_derived_cl7]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl5_003,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( composition @ X0 @ one )
= X0 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[composition_identity]) ).
thf(composition_associativity,axiom,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( composition @ X0 @ ( composition @ X1 @ X2 ) )
= ( composition @ ( composition @ X0 @ X1 ) @ X2 ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl4,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( composition @ X0 @ ( composition @ X1 @ X2 ) )
= ( composition @ ( composition @ X0 @ X1 ) @ X2 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[composition_associativity]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl20,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( composition @ X0 @ ( composition @ one @ X1 ) )
= ( composition @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
inference('s_sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl5,zip_derived_cl4]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl121,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( composition @ one @ X0 )
= ( composition @ ( converse @ one ) @ X0 ) ),
inference('s_sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl90,zip_derived_cl20]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl90_004,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( X0
= ( composition @ ( converse @ one ) @ X0 ) ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl85,zip_derived_cl7]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl125,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( composition @ one @ X0 )
= X0 ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl121,zip_derived_cl90]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl152,plain,
sk_ != sk_,
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl17,zip_derived_cl125]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl153,plain,
$false,
inference(simplify,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl152]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : REL014+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.mYCH5QwKro true
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 12:24:38 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.54/0.66 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.54/0.66 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.54/0.66 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.54/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.54/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.54/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.54/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.55/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.55/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.55/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.55/0.81 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.55/0.81 % BCE start: 14
% 0.55/0.81 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.55/0.81 % PE start: 14
% 0.55/0.81 logic: eq
% 0.55/0.81 % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.55/0.81 % done 23 iterations in 0.026s
% 0.55/0.81 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.55/0.81 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.55/0.81
% 0.55/0.81
% 0.55/0.81 % Terminating...
% 0.58/0.87 % Runner terminated.
% 0.58/0.88 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------