↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : REL015+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:04:15 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.00s 1.93s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.00s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   42 (  42 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   42 (  41 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    2 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   63 (   3 sgn  30   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(converse_multiplicativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : converse(composition(X1,X2)) = composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_multiplicativity) ).

fof(converse_idempotence,axiom,
    ! [X1] : converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_idempotence) ).

fof(composition_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : composition(X1,one) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',composition_identity) ).

fof(maddux2_join_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : join(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(join(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux2_join_associativity) ).

fof(def_top,axiom,
    ! [X1] : top = join(X1,complement(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',def_top) ).

fof(converse_cancellativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : join(composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))),complement(X2)) = complement(X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_cancellativity) ).

fof(maddux1_join_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux1_join_commutativity) ).

fof(composition_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : composition(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(composition(X1,X3),composition(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',composition_distributivity) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    composition(top,top) = top,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X48,X49] : converse(composition(X48,X49)) = composition(converse(X49),converse(X48)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_multiplicativity]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X45] : converse(converse(X45)) = X45,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_idempotence]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    converse(composition(X1,X2)) = composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X41] : composition(X41,one) = X41,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[composition_identity]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    converse(composition(converse(X1),X2)) = composition(converse(X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    composition(X1,one) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X31,X32,X33] : join(X31,join(X32,X33)) = join(join(X31,X32),X33),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux2_join_associativity]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X52] : top = join(X52,complement(X52)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[def_top]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X50,X51] : join(composition(converse(X50),complement(composition(X50,X51))),complement(X51)) = complement(X51),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_cancellativity]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X29,X30] : join(X29,X30) = join(X30,X29),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux1_join_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    composition(converse(one),X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(join(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    top = join(X1,complement(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    join(composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))),complement(X2)) = complement(X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    converse(one) = one,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    join(X1,join(complement(X1),X2)) = join(top,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    join(complement(X1),composition(converse(X2),complement(composition(X2,X1)))) = complement(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    composition(one,X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,complement(X1))) = join(top,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    join(complement(X1),complement(X1)) = complement(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_25]),c_0_28]) ).

fof(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X42,X43,X44] : composition(join(X42,X43),X44) = join(composition(X42,X44),composition(X43,X44)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[composition_distributivity]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    join(top,complement(complement(X1))) = join(X1,top),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    join(top,complement(X1)) = top,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    composition(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(composition(X1,X3),composition(X2,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    join(X1,top) = top,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    join(X1,composition(X2,X1)) = composition(join(X2,one),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_28]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    join(top,X1) = top,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_35]) ).

fof(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    composition(top,top) != top,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    join(X1,composition(top,X1)) = composition(top,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    composition(top,top) != top,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_39]),c_0_40]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : REL015+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.32  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 01:39:59 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 2.00/1.93  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 2.00/1.93  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 2.00/1.93  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.00/1.93  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.00/1.94  % Total time : 1.368s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------