↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : REL019-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:03:56 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 93.17s 14.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 93.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   23
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   84 (  84 unt;   0 nHn;  29 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   84 (  83 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   83 (   8 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(converse_multiplicativity_10,axiom,
    converse(composition(X1,X2)) = composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',converse_multiplicativity_10) ).

cnf(composition_identity_6,axiom,
    composition(X1,one) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',composition_identity_6) ).

cnf(converse_idempotence_8,axiom,
    converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',converse_idempotence_8) ).

cnf(def_zero_13,axiom,
    zero = meet(X1,complement(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',def_zero_13) ).

cnf(maddux4_definiton_of_meet_4,axiom,
    meet(X1,X2) = complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',maddux4_definiton_of_meet_4) ).

cnf(def_top_12,axiom,
    top = join(X1,complement(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',def_top_12) ).

cnf(converse_cancellativity_11,axiom,
    join(composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))),complement(X2)) = complement(X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',converse_cancellativity_11) ).

cnf(maddux1_join_commutativity_1,axiom,
    join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',maddux1_join_commutativity_1) ).

cnf(maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan_3,axiom,
    X1 = join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X1),X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan_3) ).

cnf(maddux2_join_associativity_2,axiom,
    join(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(join(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',maddux2_join_associativity_2) ).

cnf(composition_distributivity_7,axiom,
    composition(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(composition(X1,X3),composition(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',composition_distributivity_7) ).

cnf(converse_additivity_9,axiom,
    converse(join(X1,X2)) = join(converse(X1),converse(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',converse_additivity_9) ).

cnf(goals_15,negated_conjecture,
    composition(sk2,top) = sk2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals_15) ).

cnf(goals_14,negated_conjecture,
    composition(sk1,top) = sk1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals_14) ).

cnf(goals_16,negated_conjecture,
    composition(meet(sk1,sk2),top) != meet(sk1,sk2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals_16) ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    converse(composition(X1,X2)) = composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),
    converse_multiplicativity_10 ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    composition(X1,one) = X1,
    composition_identity_6 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    composition(converse(one),converse(X1)) = converse(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    converse_idempotence_8 ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    zero = meet(X1,complement(X1)),
    def_zero_13 ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    meet(X1,X2) = complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),
    maddux4_definiton_of_meet_4 ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    composition(converse(one),X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    zero = complement(join(complement(X1),complement(complement(X1)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
    top = join(X1,complement(X1)),
    def_top_12 ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    join(composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))),complement(X2)) = complement(X2),
    converse_cancellativity_11 ).

cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
    join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    maddux1_join_commutativity_1 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    converse(one) = one,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    complement(top) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
    X1 = join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X1),X2))),
    maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan_3 ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    join(complement(X1),composition(converse(X2),complement(composition(X2,X1)))) = complement(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    composition(one,X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,axiom,
    join(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(join(X1,X2),X3),
    maddux2_join_associativity_2 ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    join(top,zero) = top,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    join(complement(join(complement(X1),X2)),complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2)))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    join(complement(X1),complement(X1)) = complement(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_26]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    join(X1,join(complement(X1),X2)) = join(top,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,axiom,
    composition(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(composition(X1,X3),composition(X2,X3)),
    composition_distributivity_7 ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    join(top,join(zero,X1)) = join(top,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    join(zero,complement(complement(X1))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_23]),c_0_27]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    join(top,complement(X1)) = top,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_34]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    join(X1,composition(X2,X1)) = composition(join(X2,one),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_30]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    join(top,X1) = top,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,axiom,
    converse(join(X1,X2)) = join(converse(X1),converse(X2)),
    converse_additivity_9 ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    composition(join(X1,one),top) = top,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    join(converse(X1),converse(complement(X1))) = converse(top),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    composition(join(one,X1),top) = top,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    join(one,converse(complement(one))) = converse(top),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    composition(converse(top),top) = top,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    converse(top) = top,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_47]),c_0_18]),c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    join(zero,zero) = zero,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    join(converse(X1),converse(complement(X1))) = top,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    join(zero,join(zero,X1)) = join(zero,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    join(X1,converse(complement(converse(X1)))) = top,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    join(zero,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    join(X1,join(complement(X1),X2)) = top,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    converse(complement(converse(zero))) = top,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    join(complement(X1),join(X2,X1)) = top,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_33]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    composition(sk2,top) = sk2,
    goals_15 ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    complement(converse(zero)) = top,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_55]),c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    join(complement(X1),join(X1,X2)) = top,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
    composition(converse(sk2),complement(sk2)) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_57]),c_0_27]),c_0_27]),c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,plain,
    converse(zero) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_58]),c_0_41]),c_0_27]),c_0_41]),c_0_27]),c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,plain,
    join(complement(zero),X1) = top,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
    composition(sk1,top) = sk1,
    goals_14 ).

cnf(c_0_64,plain,
    join(converse(complement(X1)),composition(converse(complement(composition(X2,X1))),X2)) = converse(complement(X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_29]),c_0_15]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_65,negated_conjecture,
    composition(converse(complement(sk2)),sk2) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_60]),c_0_61]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,plain,
    complement(zero) = top,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_62]) ).

cnf(c_0_67,plain,
    join(X1,composition(top,X1)) = composition(top,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_68,negated_conjecture,
    composition(converse(sk1),complement(sk1)) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_63]),c_0_27]),c_0_27]),c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_69,negated_conjecture,
    composition(top,converse(complement(sk2))) = converse(complement(sk2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65]),c_0_66]),c_0_48]),c_0_67]) ).

cnf(c_0_70,negated_conjecture,
    composition(converse(complement(sk1)),sk1) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_68]),c_0_61]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_71,negated_conjecture,
    composition(complement(sk2),top) = complement(sk2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_69]),c_0_18]),c_0_18]),c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_72,negated_conjecture,
    composition(top,converse(complement(sk1))) = converse(complement(sk1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_70]),c_0_66]),c_0_48]),c_0_67]) ).

cnf(c_0_73,negated_conjecture,
    composition(meet(sk1,sk2),top) != meet(sk1,sk2),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[goals_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_74,plain,
    composition(converse(complement(composition(X1,top))),X1) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_27]),c_0_61]),c_0_53]),c_0_61]) ).

cnf(c_0_75,negated_conjecture,
    join(complement(sk2),composition(X1,top)) = composition(join(complement(sk2),X1),top),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_71]) ).

cnf(c_0_76,negated_conjecture,
    composition(complement(sk1),top) = complement(sk1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_72]),c_0_18]),c_0_18]),c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_77,plain,
    join(converse(X1),composition(converse(X1),top)) = composition(converse(X1),top),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_67]),c_0_15]),c_0_15]),c_0_48]),c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_78,negated_conjecture,
    composition(meet(sk1,sk2),top) != meet(sk1,sk2),
    c_0_73 ).

cnf(c_0_79,plain,
    join(complement(X1),composition(complement(composition(X1,top)),top)) = complement(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_74]),c_0_18]),c_0_66]) ).

cnf(c_0_80,negated_conjecture,
    composition(join(complement(sk1),complement(sk2)),top) = join(complement(sk1),complement(sk2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_75,c_0_76]),c_0_25]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_81,plain,
    join(X1,composition(X1,top)) = composition(X1,top),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_77,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_82,negated_conjecture,
    composition(complement(join(complement(sk1),complement(sk2))),top) != complement(join(complement(sk1),complement(sk2))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_78,c_0_20]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_83,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_79,c_0_80]),c_0_81]),c_0_82]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : REL019-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 04:02:30 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 93.17/14.38  % Version: 3.5.1
% 93.17/14.38  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 93.17/14.38  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 93.17/14.38  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 93.17/14.38  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 93.17/14.38  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 93.17/14.38  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 93.17/14.38  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3364854 completed with status 0
% 93.17/14.38  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 93.17/14.38  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 93.17/14.38  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 93.17/14.38  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 93.17/14.38  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 93.17/14.38  % No SInE strategy applied
% 93.17/14.38  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 93.17/14.38  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 93.17/14.38  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 93.17/14.38  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 93.17/14.38  % Starting H----_047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 93.17/14.38  % Starting G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_CO_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 93.17/14.38  % Starting U----_043_B31_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 93.17/14.38  % U----_043_B31_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_S2S with pid 3364864 completed with status 0
% 93.17/14.38  % Result found by U----_043_B31_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_S2S
% 93.17/14.38  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 93.17/14.38  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 93.17/14.38  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 93.17/14.38  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 93.17/14.38  % No SInE strategy applied
% 93.17/14.38  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 93.17/14.38  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 93.17/14.38  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 93.17/14.38  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 93.17/14.38  % Starting H----_047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 93.17/14.38  % Starting G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_CO_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 93.17/14.38  % Starting U----_043_B31_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 93.17/14.38  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 93.17/14.38  
% 93.17/14.38  % Proof found!
% 93.17/14.38  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 93.17/14.38  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 93.17/14.38  % Parsed axioms                        : 16
% 93.17/14.38  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 93.17/14.38  % Initial clauses                      : 16
% 93.17/14.38  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 93.17/14.38  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 15
% 93.17/14.38  % Processed clauses                    : 8827
% 93.17/14.38  % ...of these trivial                  : 5448
% 93.17/14.38  % ...subsumed                          : 1778
% 93.17/14.38  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1601
% 93.17/14.38  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 93.17/14.38  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 93.17/14.38  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 93.17/14.38  % Backward-rewritten                   : 317
% 93.17/14.38  % Generated clauses                    : 504747
% 93.17/14.38  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 272735
% 93.17/14.38  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 93.17/14.38  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 93.17/14.38  % Paramodulations                      : 504747
% 93.17/14.38  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 93.17/14.38  % NegExts                              : 0
% 93.17/14.38  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 93.17/14.38  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 93.17/14.38  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1126637
% 93.17/14.38  % ...of those cached                   : 969202
% 93.17/14.38  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 93.17/14.38  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 93.17/14.38  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 93.17/14.38  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 93.17/14.38  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 93.17/14.38  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 93.17/14.38  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 93.17/14.38  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 93.17/14.38  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 93.17/14.38  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 93.17/14.38  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 93.17/14.38  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 93.17/14.38  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1284
% 93.17/14.38  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1247
% 93.17/14.38  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 36
% 93.17/14.38  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 93.17/14.38  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 93.17/14.38  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 262701
% 93.17/14.38  % ...number of literals in the above   : 262701
% 93.17/14.38  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 93.17/14.38  % Current number of archived clauses   : 318
% 93.17/14.38  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 93.17/14.38  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 93.17/14.38  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 93.17/14.38  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 132
% 93.17/14.38  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 80
% 93.17/14.38  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 7852
% 93.17/14.38  % BW rewrite match successes           : 508
% 93.17/14.38  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 93.17/14.38  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 93.17/14.38  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 8151856
% 93.17/14.38  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 93.17/14.38  
% 93.17/14.38  % -------------------------------------------------
% 93.17/14.38  % User time                : 11.421 s
% 93.17/14.38  % System time              : 0.481 s
% 93.17/14.38  % Total time               : 11.902 s
% 93.17/14.38  % Maximum resident set size: 3388 pages
% 93.17/14.38  
% 93.17/14.38  % -------------------------------------------------
% 93.17/14.38  % User time                : 63.714 s
% 93.17/14.38  % System time              : 2.440 s
% 93.17/14.38  % Total time               : 66.154 s
% 93.17/14.38  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 93.17/14.38  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------