↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : REL023-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:36:52 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 8.34s 1.73s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.34s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   23
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   67 (  67 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   95 (  66 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    7 (   7   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   96 (   0 sgn  96   !;   0   ?;  71   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',maddux1_join_commutativity_1) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : join(X0,join(X1,X2)) = join(join(X0,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',maddux2_join_associativity_2) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : X0 = join(complement(join(complement(X0),complement(X1))),complement(join(complement(X0),X1))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan_3) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : join(complement(join(complement(X0),complement(X1))),complement(join(complement(X0),X1))) = X0,
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : meet(X0,X1) = complement(join(complement(X0),complement(X1))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',maddux4_definiton_of_meet_4) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : complement(join(complement(X0),complement(X1))) = meet(X0,X1),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0] : composition(X0,one) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',composition_identity_6) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : composition(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(composition(X0,X2),composition(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',composition_distributivity_7) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X0] : converse(converse(X0)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',converse_idempotence_8) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : converse(composition(X0,X1)) = composition(converse(X1),converse(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',converse_multiplicativity_10) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : join(composition(converse(X0),complement(composition(X0,X1))),complement(X1)) = complement(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',converse_cancellativity_11) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : complement(X1) = join(composition(converse(X0),complement(composition(X0,X1))),complement(X1)),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0] : top = join(X0,complement(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',def_top_12) ).

fof(f23,negated_conjecture,
    join(composition(meet(sk1,converse(sk2)),meet(sk2,sk3)),composition(sk1,meet(sk2,sk3))) != composition(sk1,meet(sk2,sk3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals_17) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    composition(sk1,meet(sk2,sk3)) != join(composition(meet(sk1,converse(sk2)),meet(sk2,sk3)),composition(sk1,meet(sk2,sk3))),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    composition(sk1,complement(join(complement(sk2),complement(sk3)))) != join(composition(complement(join(complement(sk1),complement(converse(sk2)))),complement(join(complement(sk2),complement(sk3)))),composition(sk1,complement(join(complement(sk2),complement(sk3))))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f24,f6,f6,f6,f6]) ).

tcf(c_66,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_67,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(join(X0,X1),X2) = join(X0,join(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_68,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(complement(join(complement(X0),complement(X1))),complement(join(complement(X0),X1))) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_70,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : composition(X0,one) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_71,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(composition(X0,X1),composition(X2,X1)) = composition(join(X0,X2),X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tcf(c_72,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : converse(converse(X0)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

tcf(c_74,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : composition(converse(X0),converse(X1)) = converse(composition(X1,X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tcf(c_75,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(composition(converse(X0),complement(composition(X0,X1))),complement(X1)) = complement(X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

tcf(c_76,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(X0,complement(X0)) = top,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tcf(c_81,negated_conjecture,
    join(composition(complement(join(complement(sk1),complement(converse(sk2)))),complement(join(complement(sk2),complement(sk3)))),composition(sk1,complement(join(complement(sk2),complement(sk3))))) != composition(sk1,complement(join(complement(sk2),complement(sk3)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

tcf(c_97,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(complement(join(complement(X0),X1)),complement(join(complement(X0),complement(X1)))) = X0,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_68,c_67,c_66]) ).

tcf(c_98,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(complement(X0),composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X0)))) = complement(X0),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_75,c_67,c_66]) ).

tcf(c_101,negated_conjecture,
    join(composition(sk1,complement(join(complement(sk2),complement(sk3)))),composition(complement(join(complement(converse(sk2)),complement(sk1))),complement(join(complement(sk2),complement(sk3))))) != composition(sk1,complement(join(complement(sk2),complement(sk3)))),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_81,c_67,c_66]) ).

tcf(c_138,plain,
    composition(join(sk1,complement(join(complement(converse(sk2)),complement(sk1)))),complement(join(complement(sk2),complement(sk3)))) != composition(sk1,complement(join(complement(sk2),complement(sk3)))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_101,c_71]) ).

tcf(c_215,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(X0,join(X1,X2)) = join(X1,join(X0,X2)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_67,c_66]) ).

tcf(c_218,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,complement(X0)) = join(X1,complement(X1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_76,c_76]) ).

tcf(c_220,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(X0,complement(X0)) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[c_218]) ).

tcf(c_289,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : composition(converse(one),converse(X0)) = converse(X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_70,c_74]) ).

tcf(c_298,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : composition(converse(one),X0) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_72,c_289]) ).

tcf(c_307,plain,
    converse(one) = one,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_70,c_298]) ).

tcf(c_310,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : composition(one,X0) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_298,c_307]) ).

tcf(c_2998,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,join(complement(X0),X1)) = join(iPr_def_10,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_220,c_67]) ).

tcf(c_3025,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,join(complement(X0),X1)) = join(iPr_def_10,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_220,c_67]) ).

tcf(c_3031,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,join(X1,complement(join(X0,X1)))) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_67,c_220]) ).

tcf(c_3046,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,join(X1,complement(X0))) = join(iPr_def_10,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_66,c_2998]) ).

tcf(c_3081,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,join(X1,complement(X0))) = join(iPr_def_10,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_66,c_3025]) ).

tcf(c_3400,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : join(X0,join(X1,complement(X0))) = join(X2,join(X1,complement(X2))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3046,c_3046]) ).

tcf(c_3405,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,join(X1,complement(X0))) = iPr_def_11(X1),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[c_3400]) ).

tcf(c_3478,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(iPr_def_10,X0) = iPr_def_11(X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_3081,c_3405]) ).

tcf(c_3530,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(X0,iPr_def_10) = iPr_def_11(X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3478,c_66]) ).

tcf(c_3570,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(X0,join(iPr_def_10,complement(iPr_def_11(X0)))) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3530,c_3031]) ).

tcf(c_3582,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(X0,iPr_def_11(complement(iPr_def_11(X0)))) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_3570,c_3478]) ).

tcf(c_5532,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(complement(X0),composition(converse(one),complement(X0))) = complement(X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_310,c_98]) ).

tcf(c_5539,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(complement(X0),complement(X0)) = complement(X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_5532,c_307,c_310]) ).

tcf(c_6329,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(complement(join(complement(X0),X0)),complement(complement(X0))) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5539,c_97]) ).

tcf(c_6339,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(X0,complement(X0)) = iPr_def_11(complement(X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5539,c_3405]) ).

tcf(c_6342,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : iPr_def_11(complement(X0)) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_6339,c_220]) ).

tcf(c_6344,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(complement(iPr_def_10),complement(complement(X0))) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_6329,c_66,c_220]) ).

tcf(c_6355,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(X0,iPr_def_10) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_3582,c_6342]) ).

tcf(c_9021,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(complement(iPr_def_10),complement(join(complement(X0),complement(iPr_def_10)))) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6355,c_97]) ).

tcf(c_13814,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(complement(iPr_def_10),complement(join(complement(iPr_def_10),complement(X0)))) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_66,c_9021]) ).

tcf(c_15174,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(complement(iPr_def_10),complement(X0)) = complement(X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6344,c_13814]) ).

tcf(c_15650,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : complement(complement(X0)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_15174,c_6344]) ).

tcf(c_15820,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : join(X0,X0) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_15650,c_5539]) ).

tcf(c_15929,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,join(X0,X1)) = join(X0,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_15820,c_67]) ).

tcf(c_15940,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,join(X1,X0)) = join(X1,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_15820,c_215]) ).

tcf(c_17839,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(complement(join(complement(X0),X1)),X0) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_97,c_15929]) ).

tcf(c_17930,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,complement(join(complement(X0),X1))) = X0,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_17839,c_67,c_66]) ).

tcf(c_18267,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : join(X0,complement(join(X1,complement(X0)))) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_15940,c_17930]) ).

tcf(c_18339,plain,
    composition(sk1,complement(join(complement(sk2),complement(sk3)))) != composition(sk1,complement(join(complement(sk2),complement(sk3)))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_138,c_18267]) ).

tcf(c_18340,plain,
    $false,
    inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_18339]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : REL023-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.36  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 07:19:09 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.39  Running UEQ theorem proving
% 0.11/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s ueq_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.40  
% 0.11/0.40  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.11/0.40  
% 0.11/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.11/0.42  % Proving...
% 8.34/1.73  WARNING - Clausifier option not provided in the heuristic config "heur/vip2_118404", setting default options.
% 8.34/1.73  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 8.34/1.73  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 8.34/1.73  
% 8.34/1.73  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 8.34/1.73  
% 8.34/1.73  % ------  iProver source info
% 8.34/1.73  
% 8.34/1.73  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 8.34/1.73  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 8.34/1.73  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 8.34/1.73  
% 8.34/1.73  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 8.34/1.73  
% 8.34/1.73  
% 8.34/1.73  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 8.34/1.73  
% 8.34/1.73  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 8.34/1.73  
% 8.34/1.73  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 8.34/1.73  
% 8.34/1.73  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 8.34/1.73  % ------ Proving...
% 8.34/1.73  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 8.34/1.73  
% 8.34/1.73  % 
% 8.34/1.73  % clauses                               16
% 8.34/1.73  % conjectures                           0
% 8.34/1.73  % EPR                                   0
% 8.34/1.73  % Horn                                  16
% 8.34/1.73  % unary                                 16
% 8.34/1.73  % binary                                0
% 8.34/1.74  % lits                                  16
% 8.34/1.74  % lits eq                               16
% 8.34/1.74  % fd_pure                               0
% 8.34/1.74  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 8.34/1.74  % fd_cond                               0
% 8.34/1.74  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 8.34/1.74  % AC symbols                            1
% 8.34/1.74  
% 8.34/1.74  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 8.34/1.74  
% 8.34/1.74  
% 8.34/1.74  % ------ 
% 8.34/1.74  % Current options:
% 8.34/1.74  % ------ 
% 8.34/1.74  
% 8.34/1.74  
% 8.34/1.74  % 
% 8.34/1.74  
% 8.34/1.74  % ------ Proving...
% 8.34/1.74  % 
% 8.34/1.74  
% 8.34/1.74  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 8.34/1.74  
% 8.34/1.74  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 8.34/1.74  
% 8.34/1.74  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------