↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : REL027+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:04:00 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.47s 1.15s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   81 (  74 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   91 (  90 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   21 (  11   ~;   5   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  108 (   4 sgn  46   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(converse_multiplicativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : converse(composition(X1,X2)) = composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_multiplicativity) ).

fof(converse_idempotence,axiom,
    ! [X1] : converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_idempotence) ).

fof(composition_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : composition(X1,one) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',composition_identity) ).

fof(def_zero,axiom,
    ! [X1] : zero = meet(X1,complement(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',def_zero) ).

fof(maddux4_definiton_of_meet,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : meet(X1,X2) = complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux4_definiton_of_meet) ).

fof(def_top,axiom,
    ! [X1] : top = join(X1,complement(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',def_top) ).

fof(converse_cancellativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : join(composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))),complement(X2)) = complement(X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_cancellativity) ).

fof(maddux1_join_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux1_join_commutativity) ).

fof(maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : X1 = join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X1),X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan) ).

fof(maddux2_join_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : join(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(join(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux2_join_associativity) ).

fof(converse_additivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : converse(join(X1,X2)) = join(converse(X1),converse(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_additivity) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( join(X1,one) = one
     => ( join(meet(complement(X1),one),meet(complement(composition(X1,top)),one)) = meet(complement(composition(X1,top)),one)
        & join(meet(complement(composition(X1,top)),one),meet(complement(X1),one)) = meet(complement(X1),one) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(composition_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : composition(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(composition(X1,X3),composition(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',composition_distributivity) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X23,X24] : converse(composition(X23,X24)) = composition(converse(X24),converse(X23)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_multiplicativity]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X20] : converse(converse(X20)) = X20,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_idempotence]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    converse(composition(X1,X2)) = composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X16] : composition(X16,one) = X16,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[composition_identity]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X28] : zero = meet(X28,complement(X28)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[def_zero]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X11,X12] : meet(X11,X12) = complement(join(complement(X11),complement(X12))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux4_definiton_of_meet]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    converse(composition(converse(X1),X2)) = composition(converse(X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    composition(X1,one) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    zero = meet(X1,complement(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    meet(X1,X2) = complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X27] : top = join(X27,complement(X27)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[def_top]) ).

fof(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X25,X26] : join(composition(converse(X25),complement(composition(X25,X26))),complement(X26)) = complement(X26),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_cancellativity]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X4,X5] : join(X4,X5) = join(X5,X4),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux1_join_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    composition(converse(one),X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    zero = complement(join(complement(X1),complement(complement(X1)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    top = join(X1,complement(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

fof(c_0_30,plain,
    ! [X9,X10] : X9 = join(complement(join(complement(X9),complement(X10))),complement(join(complement(X9),X10))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    join(composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))),complement(X2)) = complement(X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    converse(one) = one,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_27]) ).

fof(c_0_34,plain,
    ! [X6,X7,X8] : join(X6,join(X7,X8)) = join(join(X6,X7),X8),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux2_join_associativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    complement(top) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    X1 = join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X1),X2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    join(complement(X1),composition(converse(X2),complement(composition(X2,X1)))) = complement(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    composition(one,X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(join(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    join(top,zero) = top,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    join(complement(join(complement(X1),X2)),complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2)))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    join(complement(X1),complement(X1)) = complement(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_33]),c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    join(top,join(zero,X1)) = join(top,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    join(zero,complement(complement(X1))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_29]),c_0_35]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,complement(join(X1,X2)))) = top,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_39]) ).

fof(c_0_46,plain,
    ! [X21,X22] : converse(join(X21,X22)) = join(converse(X21),converse(X22)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_additivity]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    join(top,complement(complement(X1))) = join(top,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    join(top,complement(X1)) = top,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_42]),c_0_29]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    converse(join(X1,X2)) = join(converse(X1),converse(X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_46]) ).

fof(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( join(X1,one) = one
       => ( join(meet(complement(X1),one),meet(complement(composition(X1,top)),one)) = meet(complement(composition(X1,top)),one)
          & join(meet(complement(composition(X1,top)),one),meet(complement(X1),one)) = meet(complement(X1),one) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    join(top,X1) = top,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    converse(join(X1,converse(X2))) = join(converse(X1),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_53,plain,
    ! [X17,X18,X19] : composition(join(X17,X18),X19) = join(composition(X17,X19),composition(X18,X19)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[composition_distributivity]) ).

fof(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( join(meet(complement(esk1_0),one),meet(complement(composition(esk1_0,top)),one)) != meet(complement(composition(esk1_0,top)),one)
      | join(meet(complement(composition(esk1_0,top)),one),meet(complement(esk1_0),one)) != meet(complement(esk1_0),one) )
    & join(esk1_0,one) = one ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_50])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    join(X1,top) = top,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_51]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    join(converse(top),X1) = converse(top),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_51]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,plain,
    join(zero,zero) = zero,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    composition(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(composition(X1,X3),composition(X2,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
    join(esk1_0,one) = one,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_54]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,plain,
    converse(join(converse(X1),X2)) = join(X1,converse(X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,plain,
    converse(top) = top,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(meet(complement(esk1_0),one),meet(complement(composition(esk1_0,top)),one)) != meet(complement(composition(esk1_0,top)),one)
    | join(meet(complement(composition(esk1_0,top)),one),meet(complement(esk1_0),one)) != meet(complement(esk1_0),one) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_54]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,plain,
    join(zero,join(zero,X1)) = join(zero,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_57]) ).

cnf(c_0_64,plain,
    join(X1,composition(X2,X1)) = composition(join(one,X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_65,negated_conjecture,
    join(one,esk1_0) = one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,plain,
    join(X1,converse(complement(converse(X1)))) = top,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_29]),c_0_61]) ).

cnf(c_0_67,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(complement(join(complement(complement(esk1_0)),complement(one))),complement(join(complement(complement(composition(esk1_0,top))),complement(one)))) != complement(join(complement(complement(composition(esk1_0,top))),complement(one)))
    | join(complement(join(complement(complement(composition(esk1_0,top))),complement(one))),complement(join(complement(complement(esk1_0)),complement(one)))) != complement(join(complement(complement(esk1_0)),complement(one))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_62,c_0_23]),c_0_23]),c_0_23]),c_0_23]),c_0_23]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_68,plain,
    join(zero,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_69,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(X2,join(X1,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_32]),c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_70,negated_conjecture,
    join(X1,composition(esk1_0,X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65]),c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_71,plain,
    join(X1,composition(converse(complement(one)),X1)) = composition(top,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_66]),c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_72,plain,
    converse(composition(X1,converse(X2))) = composition(X2,converse(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_73,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(complement(join(complement(one),complement(complement(esk1_0)))),complement(join(complement(one),complement(complement(composition(esk1_0,top)))))) != complement(join(complement(one),complement(complement(esk1_0))))
    | join(complement(join(complement(one),complement(complement(esk1_0)))),complement(join(complement(one),complement(complement(composition(esk1_0,top)))))) != complement(join(complement(one),complement(complement(composition(esk1_0,top))))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_67,c_0_32]),c_0_32]),c_0_32]),c_0_32]),c_0_32]),c_0_32]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_74,plain,
    complement(complement(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_68]) ).

cnf(c_0_75,negated_conjecture,
    join(X1,join(X2,composition(esk1_0,X1))) = join(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_70]) ).

cnf(c_0_76,plain,
    join(X1,composition(X1,complement(one))) = composition(X1,top),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_71]),c_0_72]),c_0_61]),c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_77,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(complement(join(esk1_0,complement(one))),complement(join(complement(one),composition(esk1_0,top)))) != complement(join(esk1_0,complement(one)))
    | join(complement(join(esk1_0,complement(one))),complement(join(complement(one),composition(esk1_0,top)))) != complement(join(complement(one),composition(esk1_0,top))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_74]),c_0_74]),c_0_74]),c_0_74]),c_0_32]),c_0_32]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_78,negated_conjecture,
    join(complement(one),composition(esk1_0,top)) = join(esk1_0,complement(one)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_75,c_0_76]) ).

cnf(c_0_79,plain,
    join(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_74]) ).

cnf(c_0_80,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_77,c_0_78]),c_0_79]),c_0_78]),c_0_78]),c_0_79])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : REL027+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.46  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.46  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.46  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.46  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.46  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.46  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.46  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.19/0.46  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 04:05:36 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.46  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.46  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/0.53  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.53  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.47/1.15  % Version: 3.5.1
% 3.47/1.15  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 3.47/1.15  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.47/1.15  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.47/1.15  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.47/1.15  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.47/1.15  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 3.47/1.15  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 518977 completed with status 0
% 3.47/1.15  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 3.47/1.15  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 3.47/1.15  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.47/1.15  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.47/1.15  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 3.47/1.15  % No SInE strategy applied
% 3.47/1.15  % Search class: FUHPM-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 3.47/1.15  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.47/1.15  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 3.47/1.15  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 3.47/1.15  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 136s (1) cores
% 3.47/1.15  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 3.47/1.15  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 3.47/1.15  % SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 518983 completed with status 0
% 3.47/1.15  % Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 3.47/1.15  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 3.47/1.15  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.47/1.15  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.47/1.15  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 3.47/1.15  % No SInE strategy applied
% 3.47/1.15  % Search class: FUHPM-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 3.47/1.15  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.47/1.15  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 3.47/1.15  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 3.47/1.15  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 136s (1) cores
% 3.47/1.15  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 3.47/1.15  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 3.47/1.15  
% 3.47/1.15  % Proof found!
% 3.47/1.15  % SZS status Theorem
% 3.47/1.15  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 3.47/1.15  % Parsed axioms                        : 14
% 3.47/1.15  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 3.47/1.15  % Initial clauses                      : 15
% 3.47/1.15  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 3.47/1.15  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 14
% 3.47/1.15  % Processed clauses                    : 1775
% 3.47/1.15  % ...of these trivial                  : 1070
% 3.47/1.15  % ...subsumed                          : 188
% 3.47/1.15  % ...remaining for further processing  : 517
% 3.47/1.15  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 3.47/1.15  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 3.47/1.15  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 3.47/1.15  % Backward-rewritten                   : 87
% 3.47/1.15  % Generated clauses                    : 33393
% 3.47/1.15  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 15125
% 3.47/1.15  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 3.47/1.15  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 3.47/1.15  % Paramodulations                      : 33393
% 3.47/1.15  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 3.47/1.15  % NegExts                              : 0
% 3.47/1.15  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 3.47/1.15  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 3.47/1.15  % Total rewrite steps                  : 61139
% 3.47/1.15  % ...of those cached                   : 52433
% 3.47/1.15  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 3.47/1.15  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 3.47/1.15  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 3.47/1.15  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 3.47/1.15  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 3.47/1.15  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 3.47/1.15  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 3.47/1.15  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 3.47/1.15  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 3.47/1.15  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 3.47/1.15  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 3.47/1.15  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 3.47/1.15  % Current number of processed clauses  : 416
% 3.47/1.15  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 409
% 3.47/1.15  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 6
% 3.47/1.15  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 3.47/1.15  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
% 3.47/1.15  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13167
% 3.47/1.15  % ...number of literals in the above   : 13167
% 3.47/1.15  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 3.47/1.15  % Current number of archived clauses   : 102
% 3.47/1.15  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 3.47/1.15  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 3.47/1.15  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 3.47/1.15  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 35
% 3.47/1.15  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 3.47/1.15  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1880
% 3.47/1.15  % BW rewrite match successes           : 347
% 3.47/1.15  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 3.47/1.15  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 3.47/1.15  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 385338
% 3.47/1.15  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 38
% 3.47/1.15  
% 3.47/1.15  % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.47/1.15  % User time                : 0.506 s
% 3.47/1.15  % System time              : 0.038 s
% 3.47/1.15  % Total time               : 0.544 s
% 3.47/1.15  % Maximum resident set size: 3648 pages
% 3.47/1.15  
% 3.47/1.15  % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.47/1.15  % User time                : 1.967 s
% 3.47/1.15  % System time              : 0.146 s
% 3.47/1.15  % Total time               : 2.113 s
% 3.47/1.15  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 3.47/1.15  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------