↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : REL031+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 19:19:45 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 1.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   45 (  42 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   51 (  50 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   10 (   4   ~;   0   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   70 (   0 sgn  38   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( join(composition(converse(X1),X1),one) = one
        & join(composition(converse(X2),X2),one) = one )
     => join(composition(converse(composition(X1,X2)),composition(X1,X2)),one) = one ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',goals) ).

fof(converse_multiplicativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : converse(composition(X1,X2)) = composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_multiplicativity) ).

fof(composition_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : composition(X1,one) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',composition_identity) ).

fof(maddux1_join_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux1_join_commutativity) ).

fof(converse_idempotence,axiom,
    ! [X1] : converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_idempotence) ).

fof(maddux2_join_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : join(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(join(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux2_join_associativity) ).

fof(composition_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : composition(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(composition(X1,X3),composition(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',composition_distributivity) ).

fof(composition_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : composition(X1,composition(X2,X3)) = composition(composition(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',composition_associativity) ).

fof(converse_additivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : converse(join(X1,X2)) = join(converse(X1),converse(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_additivity) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( ( join(composition(converse(X1),X1),one) = one
          & join(composition(converse(X2),X2),one) = one )
       => join(composition(converse(composition(X1,X2)),composition(X1,X2)),one) = one ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : converse(composition(X3,X4)) = composition(converse(X4),converse(X3)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_multiplicativity]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X2] : composition(X2,one) = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[composition_identity]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(composition(converse(esk1_0),esk1_0),one) = one
    & join(composition(converse(esk2_0),esk2_0),one) = one
    & join(composition(converse(composition(esk1_0,esk2_0)),composition(esk1_0,esk2_0)),one) != one ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : join(X3,X4) = join(X4,X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux1_join_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    converse(composition(X1,X2)) = composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    composition(X1,one) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X2] : converse(converse(X2)) = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_idempotence]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] : join(X4,join(X5,X6)) = join(join(X4,X5),X6),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux2_join_associativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    join(composition(converse(esk2_0),esk2_0),one) = one,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    composition(converse(one),converse(X1)) = converse(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(join(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    join(one,composition(converse(esk2_0),esk2_0)) = one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] : composition(join(X4,X5),X6) = join(composition(X4,X6),composition(X5,X6)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[composition_distributivity]) ).

fof(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] : composition(X4,composition(X5,X6)) = composition(composition(X4,X5),X6),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[composition_associativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    composition(converse(one),X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : converse(join(X3,X4)) = join(converse(X3),converse(X4)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_additivity]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    join(one,join(composition(converse(esk2_0),esk2_0),X1)) = join(one,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    composition(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(composition(X1,X3),composition(X2,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    composition(X1,composition(X2,X3)) = composition(composition(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    converse(one) = one,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    converse(join(X1,X2)) = join(converse(X1),converse(X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    join(one,composition(join(converse(esk2_0),X1),esk2_0)) = join(one,composition(X1,esk2_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    join(composition(X1,composition(X2,X3)),composition(X4,X3)) = composition(join(composition(X1,X2),X4),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    composition(one,X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    join(composition(converse(esk1_0),esk1_0),one) = one,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    join(one,composition(converse(esk2_0),join(esk2_0,converse(X1)))) = join(one,composition(converse(esk2_0),converse(X1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_32]),c_0_31]),c_0_14]),c_0_31]),c_0_14]),c_0_32]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    join(X1,composition(X2,composition(X3,X1))) = composition(join(one,composition(X2,X3)),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_19]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    join(one,composition(converse(esk1_0),esk1_0)) = one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    join(composition(converse(composition(esk1_0,esk2_0)),composition(esk1_0,esk2_0)),one) != one,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    join(one,composition(converse(esk2_0),join(esk2_0,X1))) = join(one,composition(converse(esk2_0),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    join(X1,composition(converse(esk1_0),composition(esk1_0,X1))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    join(one,composition(converse(esk2_0),composition(converse(esk1_0),composition(esk1_0,esk2_0)))) != one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_19]),c_0_14]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_23]),c_0_43]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : REL031+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jul  8 11:45:43 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/1.40  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.21/1.40  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.21/1.40  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 0.21/1.40  
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof found!
% 0.21/1.40  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/1.40  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object total steps             : 45
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object clause steps            : 26
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object formula steps           : 19
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object conjectures             : 15
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 12
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 11
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 9
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object generating inferences   : 11
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 18
% 0.21/1.40  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.21/1.40  # Parsed axioms                        : 14
% 0.21/1.40  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 3
% 0.21/1.40  # Initial clauses                      : 13
% 0.21/1.40  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 13
% 0.21/1.40  # Processed clauses                    : 163
% 0.21/1.40  # ...of these trivial                  : 42
% 0.21/1.40  # ...subsumed                          : 30
% 0.21/1.40  # ...remaining for further processing  : 91
% 0.21/1.40  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Backward-rewritten                   : 12
% 0.21/1.40  # Generated clauses                    : 1808
% 0.21/1.40  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 1556
% 0.21/1.40  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Paramodulations                      : 1808
% 0.21/1.40  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Current number of processed clauses  : 79
% 0.21/1.40  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 68
% 0.21/1.40  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 10
% 0.21/1.40  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.21/1.40  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1317
% 0.21/1.40  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1317
% 0.21/1.40  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Current number of archived clauses   : 12
% 0.21/1.40  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24
% 0.21/1.40  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 171
% 0.21/1.40  # BW rewrite match successes           : 50
% 0.21/1.40  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 30215
% 0.21/1.40  
% 0.21/1.40  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/1.40  # User time                : 0.050 s
% 0.21/1.40  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.21/1.40  # Total time               : 0.053 s
% 0.21/1.40  # Maximum resident set size: 4660 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------