↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : REL048+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:04:31 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.24s 1.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   56 (  52 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   63 (  62 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   12 (   5   ~;   2   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   75 (   0 sgn  40   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(converse_multiplicativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : converse(composition(X1,X2)) = composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_multiplicativity) ).

fof(composition_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : composition(X1,one) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',composition_identity) ).

fof(converse_idempotence,axiom,
    ! [X1] : converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_idempotence) ).

fof(converse_cancellativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : join(composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))),complement(X2)) = complement(X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',converse_cancellativity) ).

fof(maddux1_join_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux1_join_commutativity) ).

fof(def_zero,axiom,
    ! [X1] : zero = meet(X1,complement(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',def_zero) ).

fof(maddux4_definiton_of_meet,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : meet(X1,X2) = complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux4_definiton_of_meet) ).

fof(def_top,axiom,
    ! [X1] : top = join(X1,complement(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',def_top) ).

fof(maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : X1 = join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X1),X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan) ).

fof(maddux2_join_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : join(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(join(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/REL001+0.ax',maddux2_join_associativity) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( join(join(X1,X2),X3) = X3
     => ( join(X1,X3) = X3
        & join(X2,X3) = X3 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X51,X52] : converse(composition(X51,X52)) = composition(converse(X52),converse(X51)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_multiplicativity]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X44] : composition(X44,one) = X44,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[composition_identity]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    converse(composition(X1,X2)) = composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    composition(X1,one) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X48] : converse(converse(X48)) = X48,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_idempotence]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    composition(converse(one),converse(X1)) = converse(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X53,X54] : join(composition(converse(X53),complement(composition(X53,X54))),complement(X54)) = complement(X54),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[converse_cancellativity]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X32,X33] : join(X32,X33) = join(X33,X32),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux1_join_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    composition(converse(one),X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X56] : zero = meet(X56,complement(X56)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[def_zero]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X39,X40] : meet(X39,X40) = complement(join(complement(X39),complement(X40))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux4_definiton_of_meet]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    join(composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))),complement(X2)) = complement(X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    converse(one) = one,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    zero = meet(X1,complement(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    meet(X1,X2) = complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

fof(c_0_28,plain,
    ! [X55] : top = join(X55,complement(X55)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[def_top]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    join(complement(X1),composition(converse(X2),complement(composition(X2,X1)))) = complement(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    composition(one,X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    zero = complement(join(complement(X1),complement(complement(X1)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    top = join(X1,complement(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

fof(c_0_33,plain,
    ! [X37,X38] : X37 = join(complement(join(complement(X37),complement(X38))),complement(join(complement(X37),X38))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan]) ).

fof(c_0_34,plain,
    ! [X34,X35,X36] : join(X34,join(X35,X36)) = join(join(X34,X35),X36),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[maddux2_join_associativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    join(complement(X1),complement(X1)) = complement(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_25]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    complement(top) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    X1 = join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X1),X2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(join(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    join(zero,zero) = zero,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    join(complement(join(complement(X1),X2)),complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2)))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    join(zero,join(zero,X1)) = join(zero,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    join(zero,complement(complement(X1))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_35]),c_0_32]),c_0_36]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    join(zero,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).

fof(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( join(join(X1,X2),X3) = X3
       => ( join(X1,X3) = X3
          & join(X2,X3) = X3 ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    complement(complement(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]) ).

fof(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(join(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0) = esk3_0
    & ( join(esk1_0,esk3_0) != esk3_0
      | join(esk2_0,esk3_0) != esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_44])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    join(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    join(join(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0) = esk3_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    join(X1,join(X1,X2)) = join(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    join(esk1_0,join(esk2_0,esk3_0)) = esk3_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,X1)) = join(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(esk1_0,esk3_0) != esk3_0
    | join(esk2_0,esk3_0) != esk3_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    join(esk1_0,esk3_0) = esk3_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    join(esk2_0,esk3_0) = esk3_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_50]),c_0_38]),c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53])]),c_0_54])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : REL048+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.32  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 01:44:15 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.33  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.24/1.71  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.24/1.71  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.24/1.71  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.24/1.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.24/1.71  % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------