↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : REL049+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:25:07 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   27 (  26 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   16 (   8   ~;   0   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   0 sgn  11   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(maddux1_join_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : join(X0,X1) = join(X1,X0),
    file('theBenchmark.p',maddux1_join_commutativity) ).

fof(maddux2_join_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : join(X0,join(X1,X2)) = join(join(X0,X1),X2),
    file('theBenchmark.p',maddux2_join_associativity) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( join(X2,X1) = X1
        & join(X0,X1) = X1 )
     => join(join(X0,X2),X1) = X1 ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(goals_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( join(X2,X1) = X1
          & join(X0,X1) = X1 )
       => join(join(X0,X2),X1) = X1 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

cnf(c_15,plain,
    join(A,B) = join(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[maddux1_join_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_16,plain,
    join(join(A,B),C) = join(A,join(B,C)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[maddux2_join_associativity]) ).

fof(nnf_14,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( join(join(X0,X2),X1) != X1
      & join(X2,X1) = X1
      & join(X0,X1) = X1 ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[goals_neg]) ).

fof(sk_goals_neg,plain,
    ( join(join(sK0,sK2),sK1) != sK1
    & join(sK2,sK1) = sK1
    & join(sK0,sK1) = sK1 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2)],[nnf_14]) ).

cnf(c_31,negated_conjecture,
    join(sK0,sK1) = sK1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_goals_neg]) ).

cnf(c_32,negated_conjecture,
    join(sK2,sK1) = sK1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_goals_neg]) ).

cnf(c_33,negated_conjecture,
    join(sK1,sK2) = sK1,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_15,c_32]) ).

cnf(c_34,negated_conjecture,
    join(join(sK0,sK2),sK1) != sK1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_goals_neg]) ).

cnf(c_35,negated_conjecture,
    join(sK1,join(sK0,sK2)) != sK1,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_15,c_34]) ).

cnf(c_39,plain,
    join(join(A,B),C) = join(B,join(A,C)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_15,c_16]) ).

cnf(c_37,plain,
    join(A,join(B,C)) = join(B,join(A,C)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_16,c_39]) ).

cnf(c_40,negated_conjecture,
    join(sK0,join(sK1,sK2)) != sK1,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_37,c_35]) ).

cnf(c_41,negated_conjecture,
    join(sK0,sK1) != sK1,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_33,c_40]) ).

cnf(c_42,negated_conjecture,
    sK1 != sK1,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_31,c_41]) ).

cnf(c_38,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_42]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : REL049+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.41  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.41  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.41  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.41  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.41  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.41  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.41  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.41  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 05:42:16 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.42  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.16/0.42  % Process 1336076 was started by sandbox on n005,
% 0.16/0.42  % Sat Sep 26 05:42:16 2026
% 0.16/0.42  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.16/0.43  
% 0.16/0.43  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.16/0.44  
% 0.16/0.44  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.44  
% 0.16/0.44  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.16/0.44  % Length of proof is 12.
% 0.16/0.44  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.16/0.44  % Maximum clause weight is 11.000.
% 0.16/0.44  % Given clauses 2.
% 0.16/0.44  
% 0.16/0.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------