↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : REL050-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:04:36 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.77s 0.90s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   27
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   88 (  83 unt;   0 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   93 (  92 equ;  11 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  122 (   8 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(converse_multiplicativity_10,axiom,
    converse(composition(X1,X2)) = composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',converse_multiplicativity_10) ).

cnf(converse_idempotence_8,axiom,
    converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',converse_idempotence_8) ).

cnf(composition_identity_6,axiom,
    composition(X1,one) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',composition_identity_6) ).

cnf(converse_cancellativity_11,axiom,
    join(composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))),complement(X2)) = complement(X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',converse_cancellativity_11) ).

cnf(maddux1_join_commutativity_1,axiom,
    join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',maddux1_join_commutativity_1) ).

cnf(def_zero_13,axiom,
    zero = meet(X1,complement(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',def_zero_13) ).

cnf(maddux4_definiton_of_meet_4,axiom,
    meet(X1,X2) = complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',maddux4_definiton_of_meet_4) ).

cnf(def_top_12,axiom,
    top = join(X1,complement(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',def_top_12) ).

cnf(maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan_3,axiom,
    X1 = join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X1),X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan_3) ).

cnf(maddux2_join_associativity_2,axiom,
    join(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(join(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',maddux2_join_associativity_2) ).

cnf(converse_additivity_9,axiom,
    converse(join(X1,X2)) = join(converse(X1),converse(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',converse_additivity_9) ).

cnf(composition_distributivity_7,axiom,
    composition(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(composition(X1,X3),composition(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',composition_distributivity_7) ).

cnf(goals_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(composition(complement(composition(sk1,top)),top),complement(composition(sk1,top))) != complement(composition(sk1,top))
    | join(complement(composition(sk1,top)),composition(complement(composition(sk1,top)),top)) != composition(complement(composition(sk1,top)),top) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals_17) ).

cnf(composition_associativity_5,axiom,
    composition(X1,composition(X2,X3)) = composition(composition(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/REL001-0.ax',composition_associativity_5) ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    converse(composition(X1,X2)) = composition(converse(X2),converse(X1)),
    converse_multiplicativity_10 ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    converse(converse(X1)) = X1,
    converse_idempotence_8 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    converse(composition(converse(X1),X2)) = composition(converse(X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    composition(X1,one) = X1,
    composition_identity_6 ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    composition(converse(one),X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    join(composition(converse(X1),complement(composition(X1,X2))),complement(X2)) = complement(X2),
    converse_cancellativity_11 ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    maddux1_join_commutativity_1 ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    converse(one) = one,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
    zero = meet(X1,complement(X1)),
    def_zero_13 ).

cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
    meet(X1,X2) = complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),
    maddux4_definiton_of_meet_4 ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    join(complement(X1),composition(converse(X2),complement(composition(X2,X1)))) = complement(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    composition(one,X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    zero = complement(join(complement(X1),complement(complement(X1)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
    top = join(X1,complement(X1)),
    def_top_12 ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    join(complement(X1),complement(X1)) = complement(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_21]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    complement(top) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,axiom,
    X1 = join(complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2))),complement(join(complement(X1),X2))),
    maddux3_a_kind_of_de_Morgan_3 ).

cnf(c_0_31,axiom,
    join(X1,join(X2,X3)) = join(join(X1,X2),X3),
    maddux2_join_associativity_2 ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    join(zero,zero) = zero,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    join(complement(join(complement(X1),X2)),complement(join(complement(X1),complement(X2)))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    join(zero,join(zero,X1)) = join(zero,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    join(zero,complement(complement(X1))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_27]),c_0_28]),c_0_29]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    join(zero,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    complement(complement(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    join(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    join(X1,join(X1,X2)) = join(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    join(X1,join(complement(X1),X2)) = join(top,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    join(X1,complement(join(complement(X1),X2))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_33]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,X1)) = join(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,complement(X1))) = join(top,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    join(X1,complement(join(X2,complement(X1)))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,axiom,
    converse(join(X1,X2)) = join(converse(X1),converse(X2)),
    converse_additivity_9 ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    join(top,complement(complement(X1))) = join(X1,top),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    join(top,complement(X1)) = top,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_28]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    join(X1,join(complement(join(X2,complement(X1))),X3)) = join(X1,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    converse(join(converse(X1),X2)) = join(X1,converse(X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    join(X1,top) = top,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    join(X1,complement(join(complement(X2),X1))) = join(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_33]),c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,complement(join(X1,X2)))) = top,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    join(X1,converse(complement(converse(X1)))) = converse(top),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    join(top,X1) = top,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_50]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,axiom,
    composition(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(composition(X1,X3),composition(X2,X3)),
    composition_distributivity_7 ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    join(X1,complement(join(X2,X1))) = join(X1,complement(X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,complement(join(X2,X1)))) = top,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    join(X1,zero) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    join(complement(X1),complement(join(X2,X1))) = complement(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,plain,
    converse(top) = top,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,plain,
    join(X1,composition(X2,X1)) = composition(join(X2,one),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_25]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,plain,
    converse(composition(X1,converse(X2))) = composition(X2,converse(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,plain,
    join(X1,complement(join(X1,X2))) = join(X1,complement(X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_57]),c_0_29]),c_0_58]),c_0_31]),c_0_20]),c_0_59]) ).

cnf(c_0_64,plain,
    join(X1,converse(complement(converse(X1)))) = top,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_60]) ).

cnf(c_0_65,plain,
    join(X1,composition(X1,converse(X2))) = composition(X1,converse(join(X2,one))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_61]),c_0_62]),c_0_62]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,plain,
    join(X1,complement(converse(complement(converse(X1))))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_64]),c_0_29]),c_0_58]) ).

cnf(c_0_67,plain,
    join(X1,composition(X1,X2)) = composition(X1,join(X2,one)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_65,c_0_15]),c_0_49]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_68,plain,
    join(X1,converse(complement(converse(complement(X1))))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_66]),c_0_15]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_69,plain,
    composition(join(X1,one),X1) = composition(X1,join(X1,one)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_67]) ).

cnf(c_0_70,plain,
    composition(join(X1,one),top) = top,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_54]) ).

cnf(c_0_71,plain,
    join(complement(X1),converse(complement(converse(X1)))) = complement(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_72,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(composition(complement(composition(sk1,top)),top),complement(composition(sk1,top))) != complement(composition(sk1,top))
    | join(complement(composition(sk1,top)),composition(complement(composition(sk1,top)),top)) != composition(complement(composition(sk1,top)),top) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[goals_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_73,axiom,
    composition(X1,composition(X2,X3)) = composition(composition(X1,X2),X3),
    composition_associativity_5 ).

cnf(c_0_74,plain,
    composition(top,top) = top,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_70]),c_0_20]),c_0_50]) ).

cnf(c_0_75,plain,
    complement(converse(complement(converse(X1)))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_71]),c_0_37]),c_0_20]),c_0_66]) ).

cnf(c_0_76,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(composition(complement(composition(sk1,top)),top),complement(composition(sk1,top))) != complement(composition(sk1,top))
    | join(complement(composition(sk1,top)),composition(complement(composition(sk1,top)),top)) != composition(complement(composition(sk1,top)),top) ),
    c_0_72 ).

cnf(c_0_77,plain,
    composition(top,composition(top,X1)) = composition(top,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_74]) ).

cnf(c_0_78,plain,
    converse(complement(converse(X1))) = complement(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_75]) ).

cnf(c_0_79,negated_conjecture,
    ( join(complement(composition(sk1,top)),composition(complement(composition(sk1,top)),top)) != complement(composition(sk1,top))
    | join(complement(composition(sk1,top)),composition(complement(composition(sk1,top)),top)) != composition(complement(composition(sk1,top)),top) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_80,plain,
    composition(top,complement(composition(top,X1))) = complement(composition(top,X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_77]),c_0_60]),c_0_61]),c_0_20]),c_0_50]) ).

cnf(c_0_81,plain,
    composition(top,converse(X1)) = converse(composition(X1,top)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_60]) ).

cnf(c_0_82,plain,
    complement(converse(X1)) = converse(complement(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_78]) ).

cnf(c_0_83,negated_conjecture,
    ( composition(complement(composition(sk1,top)),join(one,top)) != complement(composition(sk1,top))
    | composition(complement(composition(sk1,top)),join(one,top)) != composition(complement(composition(sk1,top)),top) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_79,c_0_67]),c_0_20]),c_0_67]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_84,plain,
    converse(composition(complement(composition(X1,top)),top)) = converse(complement(composition(X1,top))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_80,c_0_81]),c_0_82]),c_0_81]),c_0_82]) ).

cnf(c_0_85,negated_conjecture,
    composition(complement(composition(sk1,top)),top) != complement(composition(sk1,top)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_83,c_0_50]),c_0_50])]) ).

cnf(c_0_86,plain,
    composition(complement(composition(X1,top)),top) = complement(composition(X1,top)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_84]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_87,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_85,c_0_86])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : REL050-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 04:09:05 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.77/0.90  % Version: 3.5.1
% 3.77/0.90  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 3.77/0.90  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.77/0.90  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.77/0.90  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.77/0.90  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.77/0.90  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 3.77/0.90  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2212004 completed with status 0
% 3.77/0.90  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 3.77/0.90  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 3.77/0.90  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.77/0.90  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.77/0.90  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 3.77/0.90  % No SInE strategy applied
% 3.77/0.90  % Search class: FUHPM-FFMF21-DFFFFFNN
% 3.77/0.90  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.77/0.90  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 3.77/0.90  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 3.77/0.90  % Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 3.77/0.90  % Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_RG_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 3.77/0.90  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 3.77/0.90  % H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_RG_S2S with pid 2212013 completed with status 0
% 3.77/0.90  % Result found by H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_RG_S2S
% 3.77/0.90  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 3.77/0.90  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.77/0.90  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.77/0.90  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 3.77/0.90  % No SInE strategy applied
% 3.77/0.90  % Search class: FUHPM-FFMF21-DFFFFFNN
% 3.77/0.90  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.77/0.90  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 3.77/0.90  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 3.77/0.90  % Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 3.77/0.90  % Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_RG_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 3.77/0.90  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 3.77/0.90  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 3.77/0.90  
% 3.77/0.90  % Proof found!
% 3.77/0.90  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.77/0.90  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 3.77/0.90  % Parsed axioms                        : 17
% 3.77/0.90  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 3.77/0.90  % Initial clauses                      : 17
% 3.77/0.90  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 3.77/0.90  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 16
% 3.77/0.90  % Processed clauses                    : 1316
% 3.77/0.90  % ...of these trivial                  : 735
% 3.77/0.90  % ...subsumed                          : 222
% 3.77/0.90  % ...remaining for further processing  : 359
% 3.77/0.90  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 3.77/0.90  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 3.77/0.90  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 3.77/0.90  % Backward-rewritten                   : 78
% 3.77/0.90  % Generated clauses                    : 31016
% 3.77/0.90  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 15078
% 3.77/0.90  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 3.77/0.90  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 3.77/0.90  % Paramodulations                      : 31016
% 3.77/0.90  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 3.77/0.90  % NegExts                              : 0
% 3.77/0.90  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 3.77/0.90  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 3.77/0.90  % Total rewrite steps                  : 64866
% 3.77/0.90  % ...of those cached                   : 54312
% 3.77/0.90  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 3.77/0.90  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 3.77/0.90  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 3.77/0.90  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 3.77/0.90  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 3.77/0.90  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 3.77/0.90  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 3.77/0.90  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 3.77/0.90  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 3.77/0.90  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 3.77/0.90  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 3.77/0.90  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 3.77/0.90  % Current number of processed clauses  : 265
% 3.77/0.90  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 258
% 3.77/0.90  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 7
% 3.77/0.90  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 3.77/0.90  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 3.77/0.90  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13531
% 3.77/0.90  % ...number of literals in the above   : 13531
% 3.77/0.90  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 3.77/0.90  % Current number of archived clauses   : 95
% 3.77/0.90  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 3.77/0.90  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 3.77/0.90  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 3.77/0.90  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 43
% 3.77/0.90  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 3.77/0.90  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 877
% 3.77/0.90  % BW rewrite match successes           : 238
% 3.77/0.90  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 3.77/0.90  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 3.77/0.90  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 391052
% 3.77/0.90  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 5
% 3.77/0.90  
% 3.77/0.90  % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.77/0.90  % User time                : 0.434 s
% 3.77/0.90  % System time              : 0.026 s
% 3.77/0.90  % Total time               : 0.460 s
% 3.77/0.90  % Maximum resident set size: 3648 pages
% 3.77/0.90  
% 3.77/0.90  % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.77/0.90  % User time                : 2.057 s
% 3.77/0.90  % System time              : 0.138 s
% 3.77/0.90  % Total time               : 2.195 s
% 3.77/0.90  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 3.77/0.90  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------