%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : DCTP---1.31 % Problem : RNG001-3 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : oldtptp % Command : dctp-wrapper -negpref -complexity -fullrewrite -alternate -resisol %s % Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu % Model : i686 i686 % CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz % Memory : 2018MB % OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Sat Dec 4 15:33:40 EST 2010 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.00s % Output : Assurance 0.00s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % running dctp on problem file RNG001-3.oldtptp on host art07.cs.miami.edu % starting preprocessing loop for 8 clauses % starting preprocessing loop for 8 clauses % no conjecture type clause ... restricting relevance to all-negative clauses % input formula is Horn % problem statistics for file /tmp/SystemOnTPTP25304/RNG001-3.oldtptp % Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 0 non-Horn; 3 unit) % Number of literals : 25 ( 0 equality) % Maximal clause size : 5 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 propositional; 3-3 arity) % Number of functors : 4 ( 2 constant; 0-2 arity) % Number of variables : 34 ( 0 singleton) % Maximal term depth : 2 % Starting proof % **************** Exit status is success (PROOF found in 0.02 seconds) **************** % Proof search statistics: % ======================== % Length initial path: 8 % Linking steps (succ/fail): 300 / 249 % Twin-clause inferences: 0 % Eager eliminations: 0 % Rewrites (subgoal/path): 0 / 0 % GR-closures total/c-foldup: 198 / 0 % Links generated/deleted: 1640 / 1430 % Links sweeped vector/all: 0(0) / 0(0) % Clauses in tableau/pruned: 300 / 292 % Regularity/Tautology fails: 0 / 32 (0) % Renamings/Contractions: 0 / 3 % Variants deleted/subsumed: 1 / 125 % Clauses by splitting: 0 % Variant subsumption tests: 1438 % Fails ful/mat/sig/len: 43 / 956 / 146 / 168 % Pre subsumption tests: 64 % Subsumed unit/path/back: 523 / 0 / 11 % Coupled eliminations: 0 % Simplifications/lemmas: 300 / 45 (0) % Foldups root/context: 6 / 1 % Maximum term depth/compl: 6 / 10 % Relevance vectors: 502 % Unifications/failed: 0 / 0 % Maximum tableau depth: 201 % Killed 1 orphans % %------------------------------------------------------------------------------